You're good at working on the edge of realism and decorative arts. Some tend to work with stained glass. I understand NATA NOVA, why she liked the portrait , but to me it is not particularly - rude. Like some still life :

• 2 from the first post , but did not have as much "pattern " drapery.
• 4 and 5 of the second post . In the fourth it would be better to remove uzorchik a blue vase - it prevents really crushes . At 5 again draping, first - not understandable by color ( put it just like that ?) And the loop wraps around the bank , but the bottle was successful.
• The flowers are not successful, you can see no good way to translate them into a decorative background, and not very realistic , and know how to get corny.
• Tulip - awful.
• The last still life is not bad, but really is smaller and again reduces the contours of the leaves , the decanter , and the leaves not a shadow , and the mud .

I'm sorry if you do not like the analysis , I hope not hurt . :)>
P.S. Yes, there is no post-impressionism style . It is the symbol of the group did stylistically unrelated artists , the more " post- post-post " :)>

There are a few, but they are absolutely terrible

Added after 6 minutes
zarajara, thank you for your criticism, it is necessary :)>

All my works are not complying with the law, or canon, I think this is something there :)>

I only asked about the other works in this style (Issues in force :)>

Correct: "interested", because there is a personal interpretation

NATA NOVA, since there is an interest, then why not?
Do not be alarmed, it is your desire:


1.
Magic flight

2.Nerealizovannye dreams


It is very difficult to draw such things, as it turns out (with a tool that is) :(>

Добавлено через 14 секунд
NATA NOVA, since there is an interest, then why not?
Do not be alarmed, it is your desire:


1.
Magic flight

2.Nerealizovannye dreams


It is very difficult to draw such things, as it turns out (with a tool that is) :(>

NATA NOVA, since there is an interest, then why not?
Do not be alarmed, it is your desire:


1.
Magic flight

2.Nerealizovannye dreams


It is very difficult to draw such things, as it turns out (with a tool that is) :(>

Today at auction "Kabinet" will be sold here such a self-portrait of Konstantin Chebotarev 1918 (paper, watercolor, pencil, 28.7x23.5) with an estimate of 75 - 90 thousand rubles.:

Pablo, these samples as a few in the other direction ...

That is not (yet) a search for his formula and portrait (in my opinion) the most successful,,

NATA NOVA, to be honest, it's weird stuff :)> All opinions are subjective and can not be helped :(>

Added after 1 minutes
Cyril Syzran, is very expensive.
My IMHO - look blank :(>

Pablo, where you want to be (in the arts) years, say, five?
(In other words: What are your goals and what is your goal?)

zarajara, that's how it looks on the wall, I would not say that the tulip is terrible :)> This is one of my best works

Brrr ...
very scary to watch herself :(>