Without discussion, any topic nothing.
With this approach, it (the issue) will be of interest only to the author.

I said about the consumer exclusively in your context, because sounded about sale-purchase. Do not you understand what I said, theoretically, with a 2-position, which can be user-
 -As a spectator,
-As an investor.
  You jumped at the last, thinking that you can talk to pervesti advantageous for you on track.
Meaning I do not see what you say. My position is announced, nothing new to add to what has already been said, I was broke, because no avail. Sobsno, to each his :)

Added after 8 minutes
You are absolutely right. Look at the two galleries, where discussions more than posts with pictures :)))) mainly criticized, with good artists, of whom comrade. K. Mahler wrote, which I am clumsy turns out, saying that I put up for their forum where their wool than nothing :).

Still interesting for people to watch, so all ... different :)))))

Pecheneg, obuzhdenie WHAT?
(Or do you call a discussion of a variety of snort?)

It would be nice if clearly explained and civilized "investment criteria developed taste" why "tears" (etc.) - and that way, "throwing stones" was one ...

I see everything.
If I do not leave your comments, it does not mean that I do not check my topic and who can not read and writes .
Gandhi's teaching consists of four sections :

 - First they ignore you

 - Then they laugh at thee

 - Then they're going to fight with you

 - Then you will win.

Of course, it would be nice ..

. Personally, my opinion , if someone from respected gurus like put work like that, and what is not , I think, would be snorting at least the same cones to get enough.

Laura's experience and so valuable, that expresses the unprepared consumer tastes (and is a hundred times already mentioned , it is an art lover from the beginning of the summer of 2012 ) has just found out her interest , and in the end decided to leave the topic .
And I became interested observer of the subject :)

Laura, thank you, that caught my idea to display images that you do not like.
Art in the subject has grown many times over. If still show that, from what you just sick, then we will pick up a great art-truth.

Similarly.

Technically, such a lock exists.

If the artist " does not want to copy the photo of the pictures from the site ," it should online is simply specify :
Use of this site only with the agreement ( in writing ) of the owner (author ).

Maybe not, I'm no expert.

But.

On some sites, for example, I can not copy photos.

Maybe I do not know how to circumvent these issues, but these sites are.

This protection is easy to bypass.

More or less protected from copying sites Sotheby's and Christie. But this protection is only from those who do not want to bother .

So if you really put it to the network - then all went for a walk.

In fact it is not so bad. It is clear that the most popular flavor - it's a massive taste, but eats like citation index of scholarly articles, it is commonly determined by the significance of any research. Perhaps this method to the PI is not entirely applicable, but nevertheless.
Here, for example , the most viewed works from my base :
The most viewed usually sold , if the price is not insane.