sportsmen, you excuse the participants talk, just your work is really very weak, not so much on art as the architecture of the bridge.

People about whom you so " flattering "withdraw showed enough tact and patience, explaining the nuances of you ... Not only that you are " mixing up the pedal "on the Rothko , you are still trying to defend their opinion with respect to this savagery and daub ( excuse me , that named all their names )
We in Odessa say : Come on Privoz , buy it cock ... Then , hopefully , in the course ...

Imagine, I'm the fifth generation and is not aware of :)>

This is a very peculiar sense of humor ...)) Let's like going home on leave to their relatives, will you give your phone ... and somewhere in a decent place for a glass of tea, I will reveal to you the terrible secret :) "All right?

Thanks for the aesthetic evaluation of this picture and compared it with the original photograph. When I buy Desktop, I will advise you on the subject of the similarity of these wallpaper images to present a live picture outside the window.

Only let us not fantasies. I am nobody here has done a detailed study, no "nuances" I have not explained, except for stupid advice. Is the maximum assistance for which I am infinitely grateful, it's only writing a single line on the basis of visual sight. And even more so should not you ascribe others' achievements.

I like anything without you and these "experts" will deal about the "daub" and the aesthetic component of this picture. Understand what to do extremely difficult without a "gifted" art from Lugansk, Stavropol, and yet I somehow try to rely on himself. Although a great pleasure listening to these "experts" (with beer and chips), about the indescribable beauty of the masterpieces of Rothko, the relevant million price on these pictures.

And, you know, you with your replica reminded me very issue of the Armenian radio: "Can I have sex on the Red Square?".


Dear Vivienne! Firstly, it's not my job. This is just my picture. Secondly, yes let it be a million times weaker and worse job of any teacher of drawing in a rural school. My simple question was merely a request for people to decipher the signature and name the approximate cost. Again I repeat my question:

After all, it seems, all written in Russian, even a schoolboy would understand. Do not necessarily appear shovels spirited unique with his expertise and his views on the aesthetic component.

So how to explain it easier on the fingers, that I seem to be who decides whether there is a difference to me or not. Casting pearls before Pechenegov, explaining to him, for what I need or not need to know, of course, I will not. Too much honor for him. Just as I remember, like I did not ask about the similarity with the original photograph and the question "Find three differences." It turns out that, instead of generally keep silent or to answer "do not know, begin to imitate various nitwits with some photohosting:" Hide this ugliness, no shame! "

And even though I'm in two foreign languages, participated in numerous discussions on the policy to antiques, but our Vysk-spiritual people have a habit of metanatsii puddles.