Quote:
Originally Posted by Seriy
(Post 686404)
what your zeal? What these comparisons with Malevich?
I just told him that feeling. Since I was there in person (already mentioned) and could buy without any problems, just do not like it, no regrets. There are knowledgeable people, they are treated well, although the money they had pockets full.
decorative - a very important element, looking at the great Nepriznannogoprizhiznigeniya Van Gogh's see how much effort he spends on that? to achieve a decorative effect. Yellow and blue is the mask of Tutankhamen, T e is the eternal problem-showy color solution.
Like-buy ...
And if you all so you can see such an obvious genius of the author, where were you in 2002? that, 200 dollars (I think even cheaper than it was) was not in your pocket? Do not believe it!
So why then is the heat sink? if it is obvious, go and buy, come from Paris, London and buy ... 200 dollars a pair of decent shoes you can not buy ... But no, do not want to buy, but want to talk ... :-)
|
My "enthusiasm" to the fact that you do not know how to debate - the problem with logic. I repeat: decorative - not the principal and, moreover, is not the only criterion for evaluating the work.
Strange question: where I was in 2002? Then I have not dealt with collecting. This is the first. Second: auction Inkombank, more precisely, the sale of his collection - is an exception to the rule. And the article in "Kommersant" excellent confirms.
And about DECORATIVE ... Look, do the work is not purely decorative? In my opinion, how!
http://community.livejournal.com/ruguru/716126.html |
