For people interested in modern developed visual art is ridiculous to compare the author's portrait of Catherine poradnyh era with the author of brilliant works of the twentieth century.

You , vg_edger, I'm sorry, but this forum is not to be compared to his stripes tank top or on the fence with the works of Rothko, you seem to be wrong forum - a forum Investing in art , and works of Rothko's just such investments are.

About " like - not like " in other places. :)

Color and line two main ways of creative expression for hudozhnika.Rotko also speak this language .. Its colorful stripes and lines seen people have an emotional impact , .. on some pretty strong .. It is difficult to compare the incomparable .. For me , for example , Caravaggio than Borovikovsky acts .

And about peteushnikov when they write online about art - not that strange?

Half of these posts - is trolling personally "great scientist" Syzran, intentional or not.

Rothko - American artist, I do not really understand what is the interest to discuss it in the context of this forum. As Cayce? As the study of the demand for investment in his work?

Here Comrade. Guriev says that modernism can not be a traditional grading scale (and postmodernism - the more so). Apparently the scale here is different. "Free Pap?" Expression of color? Exemption from the form? But it was already. So what scale? Can Syzran "Real Money" knows?

That's interesting to consider the scale, and the work itself ...

Furthermore, it is very important in my opinion. As a person with "computer education" I used to work with abstractions and reduced entities, which later software can sculpt anything by combining. Rothko and other "abstract" artists completely fit into this paradigm, the picture is not only calculated the computer, and the human brain. But one method - reduction and combinatorics. Hence the simple forms. However komputer is capable of more than the brain Rothko, so why not invest in a computer work? Why not discuss it? And while there are no sales, no cock crowed, all asleep. But Rothko, yes, very important in Syzran.

About strange art can be confusing because the write nespa?

On the ability to make some T-shirts and stripes have much stronger emotional impact than the same Rothko, so it's no surprise that someone finds something in bands Rothko.

And someone else and this will almost orgasm:

Duchamp, readymade, urinal.

Rothko would fluff about him and the words would not say no . And as the number of copies so mangled and still mangled around his "simple ?" strips , then .... Mean?
And as for the devil vg_edger Indians try to tell , or Buddhists, much surprised by the response .

I'm not sure what the point.
Here Lenin like a pacifier too was not.
But I wish it was not.

Personally, I'm Comrade. Rothko did not hurt at all. Unlike, say, Kandinsky, which I suppose is not actively love.

Well, someone likes, someone pays.
God help you ...

Added after 5 hours 12 minutes
So I woke this your tekstik.
A good idea, in my vzglyal, wrote.
(I dropped all other obsuzhdalova quoting you. Quite correct, however, but it is better to discuss the topic, and not others, is not it?).

 You ten times already stated , the scale - composition, color, line, stroke , has not changed for hundreds of years , if not thousands , and is called art. Just great majority of people, including many users on the forum these concepts available to understand , here and there for the umpteenth time , what scale? old !
And also the same modernism scale assessed.

Another thing is that for trade in painting, is the subject prochuvstvovanie , IMHO, is not necessarily enough to know what the public wants , what trends, refinement of the artist in the cultural landscape . Relatively speaking, if the buyer was in the house , minimalist design, Makovsky, he does not need , and Rothko - yes!