Well, I do .
Personally, I am :
sophisticated texts of the two donov , sincere caucasian with wisdom Samvel , intelligent DSF - all I read with pleasure .
In particular, in your journalistic provocative speech , comrade .

" Senka " do not put so as not to interfere
but in the latter case , ie, in your , I can not , because , really , absolutely do not share ,
exact - I do not understand
exact - do not understand how anyone can not understand
 more accurately - I do not understand how you can not feel .

However ,
A similar situation I had with surrealism . No matter how to deploy, or expand, or deepen - no .
At Daly did not want to watch . No Chirico , Tanguy no , no , Magritte , let alone an imitator - it is not saved.
And I'm not very worried about this :)
But that's another story .

Interesting story.

I love these mystical.
Allowed himself a little touch up the photo.

To paraphrase : a theoretical physicist simplifies the reality , that is, operates more or less simple concepts and notions. This allows us to concentrate on your core. Well , etc. But the engineer must consider many things of the physical world : friction , material properties , etc. But the progress of a move first .

A long pause, but I want to say that the theme of one of the best.
Best.

I like a phrase that may be irrelevant, but somewhere, perhaps, is not alien to him.

Between the two extreme views is not the truth; between them lies the problem.
Abstract - really a problem.

I do not want to convince the unconvinced. I just think that to balance the views of abstraction-Filov should add, say, mine.
And what is it unclear?

Dali - just a very average artist with a memorized techniques (oplyvalovo, vydvigalovo, land-desert, an empty sky ...). It is much more interesting to write lyrics than a brush.

De Chirico - no not surrealist, that he would have no say about yourself. And just in general great, consider the artist.
Magritte - just weak in the painting, but it, unlike Dali, there is some sincerity that much swimming.
And, say, painting by Kandinsky on the quality even more slabzhe magrittovskoy ...

I fully support this opinion . Theme - one of the best on the forum for intellectual and cultural urological importance . I read with great delight and pleasure , and express my deep appreciation and respect for people that have filed it professionally and competently .

And what does this mean ?
Here you often write : " weak draftsman , " " no colorist , " " weak painter . "
And with what /whom do you compare ?
With students of art institutions ? There are well painted plaster antique head , yes . Do you have the " ability " before the eyes see when you write , for instance, this :
Huh? ?

Beautifully said. Only in the language of poetry and we can talk about painting.
Or - when there is no gift of versification - on surzhik metaphors.

Senka you for PLURALIZM
A large Glasha Senka for suralizm: :)
Do not look at Dali - take a look around:
And near and far - surreal terms. ))

On my system, the definitions of this scheme is not abstract, but abstraktoidnoy painting.
Abstract paintings arise by virtue of an inner necessity - when the need arises from the artist ("reason" in the terminology Gurieva) to express the complex image, for which the figurative is neorganichnym. What is already here, "simplify" the artist's life - the ultimate sophistication.
All this applies to the "associative abstraction": a measure of success in this area is not at all have been holding a line production for profit "abstraktikov" with a hint of the subject.

Interesting image, but I would elaborate. "Real" abstractionist "is a theoretical physicist and engineer, experimenter rolled into one. Two words - Nikola Tesla.

Be sure to tell you.

Also interesting, especially about the

Arkady Raikin remembered makes it possible for this: "I personally sew buttons. To toggle the claim is?"


________________

And yet it is.