Interestingly perception forumchan. Share what picture more like it. Not entirely correct from a photo, but it is certainly. I "mockery of Christ" and "Mr. Z".

Konstantin,
I liked these so:
Thank you!

Magnificent Nolde, in particular, 2 of the landscape, given grandpa another you on the first page.

I most:
Thanks

Yesterday I was at this show. I am very, very fond of expressionism, probably in my perception they follow right behind Surrealists, but on this show I was expecting much more. All the same, in my opinion, "Bridge" weaker "Blue vsadnego. Good things are a little pieces of 5.6 maximum. Without Kandinsky, Yavlensky, Mark, Campendonk, watercolors Nolde, Pechstein Expressionists good scenery for me fade. In the works at this exhibition is very much the influence of Impressionism and Fauvism ... There is little of the independence of color and beauty, which appears in the works of the expressionists after 1910. In humans, the first time looking expressionism, as such, may arise after watching this show a false sense of the nature and essence of Expressionism ...

The man, in my opinion, goes to the exhibition to get an aesthetic pleasure, and not to go into the essence of the "... isms"

to the exhibition went to people, it is not sophisticated in the arts ... they did not like and they had the wrong impression about the direction ... what's this good? "and I think, sometimes going into the essence of the" ... isms "You can lose a lot of aesthetic pleasure ...

Well, in general, the better you know, the more you love. I think Maitre rights:)

"Proper" impression does not mean "correct." (cf. "... all-powerful, because it is true!")
Or lion?

If the viewer is not prepared, besides the type of realism "Shishkin-forest" he did not like it. Because everything else does not. Recall Nikita Sergeyevich. There is a natural reaction - embarrassment, provoking rejection. My opinion - before the show Expressionists need certain educational training. Otherwise you will not like it. It is no accident that so easy for them stuck in their time labeled "degenerate art", the townsfolk converges not vrubilsya, and they can understand.

We should not "pre-show", and general education training, schematically speaking like Noah: "every creature on the pair, or as Pushkin:" no compulsion in conversation to refer to just a little ... "
By the way, the basis of the Tretyakov Gallery - just "Shishkin-forest", and only then people realize, "Which of the forest came."

but these all can boast of very few people ... unless you're referring to a smattering, but better than nothing at all to know how satisfied wild guesses ...

I this naprvaleniem knew little, and despite this I liked.
Meister if not difficult proilyustriruyte your comment. Put a picture to Geneva of course, you feel better.

I heard from someone intelligent, I do not remember: "We must not sink to the level of the crowd, and raise the crowd to their level."

Go on, that the rapid on comp found. If it will be interesting, add more. Left to right: G. Campendonk, F. Mark, E. Nolde, G. Munter

Note Kandinsky with Jawlensky I did not even touch.