Try, never probyval -
In general, I think a big mistake to assume-designed art. Art is the artistry is not bound by any conventions, whether it is realism or abstraction. Must feel the talent, but it's always something new.
And, always a talented few, even in China.

Pavel, I have all the floats. no dog in sight. so it should be?

Yes, you simply go to the U-tubes can there be luchshe, I tazhe so. There, a whole collection of China 3-story-they are short. Another try and wait flare

[color="# 666686"]Posted 1 hour 7 minutes[/color]
Veronica Let the Chinese, all that is.

I was in Hong Kong for the exhibition of souvenirs (!). They sell more paintings. The taste, the color - but very busy and highly professional. At an average price of 15 am.dol.

I think you will agree. But, we do not know the whole picture of what is happening in China.
Once, on a sample, we ordered a picture from a Chinese website. Came the picture, which only vaguely resembled the photograph of the site. The quality was very low, however, as the price.

But as soon as the Chinese artist comes to the West, its price compared with European artists, sometimes even become considerably higher. In fact, the principle of Chinese - scatter market goods is not always justified. Specifically, in the case painting better, if there is a deficit.

Yes. Well, exactly. Respect.

As well as "quality" and "-designed" is not always identical concepts ...

We have always. Or, then what is the difference?

Pavel, Always ... philological yes. And in the prism of art, namely, "In general I think a big mistake to assume-designed art." I think not.
Here, for example Korovin ... Cafe in Yalta "(if you like of course (I do)) is not as well? Like-"boot anointed" (quoted critics) - but always hit the target! The result was a painting. And art shabashniks with "boulevard" every twig of fir trees slaver-what? Is it quality? No-stiff.

That's exactly what I mean. Korovin is the first of whom was influenced by French Impressionism, but he was a theater artist, impr.-professional easel. They just did not give orders to the theater. In contrast Korovin, he was earning in the private theater and the rest later. I Korovin I like Gurzuf things. Korovin worked in Paris and did not impress. CHA, Quay is commerce, the art has no relevance. A y Liss.

[color="# 666686"]Posted 10 hours 25 minutes[/color]
Two more links to Hockney.
Even the four

Yes, I mulberries. Little time to the network in connection with the exhibition ...
Quay, yes. CHA perverted by commerce. But there is a chorus of the exhibition.
Gurzuf Korovin .... Yes of course super ...
And why is he the theater? He landscape. And on education. However Levitan on "luteus" all went ... Constantine ... In the theater, who themselves have not tried ... By Sergei keep reminding me ... if he was the theater? ...
(I am in touch, but rarely)

Come on let's strike while still being forged.
Ai-yai-yai, Korovin mostly theater and became famous because Mamontov under tusks with Serov was. Chaliapin was friendly and portraits of some pevichek-Simonovic, etc. But the work had not enough.
Have you ever been there?

Pavel, That's me in the woods ... Greetings.

lucky, breathe deeply. Do you pine there?: Rolleyes:
I envy you.

Pavel, No, birch. Here I write them sometimes.
Prikrolno that the Chinese art of dissolved ....

Great! Birches! Air! But here in the studio was dark and cold. Enjoy. The hostess forgot about the Chinese. There is such a book "Art of the garden with a grain of mustard seed" on the basics of Chinese painting. Once seen, but there was no money.