Matisse is not opposed,
and Clement Greenberg - contrasted
so in New York is no "illusion"
among the "serious artists"
at the time and was :rolleyes:

but no local artists Greenberg was not terrible,
New York is far and as artist-teachers
they are not so dependent on the mood of critics and dealers

Once плосковато and boring, the second Comrade Greenberg wrote ...

What is the phrase "nature finds a justification in itself" - which immediately after the words of God.

this I do not agree with you,
just my opinion, Comrade Greenberg wrote
internally persuasive
believing in what he says

and most of his ideas, I fully agree with him
(although as a model of kitsch
I would not give Repin for example)

the problem was just in some of his extremism
he's so all there in New York intimidated
attacks on any even chance of something like
or occasionally three-dimensional image,
that the tyranny of his could not cause
response revolution :cool:

and alas, so they despised kitsch
back in new guises conceptualized
winning and renowned art fair
as more avant-garde :(

Se in contrast
neither Park nor any Dibenkorn Bischof with Greenberg did not fight
and were soon on his side
just their abstract included the
conventionally representational art as a certain part

but their realism is not quite the same realism
that Repin

For 39-year? :D

Of course, you're right. But I talked about the work of these artists in the years 1940-60. Where, in my opinion, can and should speak about the rejection of abstraction. Returning to her Diberkorna (Series Ocean Park Paintings), and Bischoff goes beyond the reporting period. Nevertheless, I admit my guilt - I have not specified the time frame rassmatrizhvaemogo direction.

Sure.

Because by this time had long been over, and he just woke up.

Ortega y Gasset in any years better than writing.

And much.

But whether he knew Repin? :D

Do not quite understand.

Repin (in the best years) the same realism that, for instance, Millet, Chardin, Guardi, Velazquez and others

Do not see any differences.

You can say that C-F school "realism" of another type?

This is what is-best?

I think yes.

He was generally very well educated man.

And you did Rebelión de las Masas read in Spanish?

Well, "Pirogov", sleeping in a chair from the Saratov Museum, and the early "Preparing for the exam."
But you never know ...

Repin many wonderful works.

And what do you do not like Ilya Efimovich?

I'm not saying what he was draftsman ...

Added after 37 seconds
No, only in Russian.

I'm in Spanish I do not read.

In Soviet translation?

Yes that's right - abstracted realism
that was not Repinsky realism
Repin, although I really respect and kitsch have nicknamed it did not,

for artists' posleabstraktsionistov "
so to speak

depicted object is only cause
for painting as an organization of color and form in the plane of the canvas
and how to write books:
story concocted for any resemblance to real people and events
artist is not responsible :rolleyes:

therefore such categories as
"and I got the color," rather than a crooked vase ":cool:
such an artist simply can not think

Added after 5 minutes
thanks

the only thing that I
"rejection of abstraction" does not seem
return to the old realism
as some opportunistic step back
or floating with the party line

such as the pampered and that's enough --
need to do business again

on the contrary - I think it is a movement
perfectly reasonable and natural
is an honest study of borders in both directions
and finding its place among

Hmm. Translated Geleskula for the History of Aesthetics in monuments and documents. "

He had been reduced as necessary.

Wholly he published in Problems of Philosophy "in 1989, but I have not seen.

However, with Ortega, I was never going to read.