![]() |
I was just on those trades.
And I remember how to get Tiesenhausen off work from the wall, people who have it inspected before the sale. For some reason he did not really want to do it. In his even raised his voice, which plunged him into the paint. I'm with Christy for false Burliuk returned the money last year without problems. Of course it was not as much money as for Kustodiev. |
Цитата:
Diletanstvo amatorstvo and can take many different forms .. As in painting (imitations), and investment ... |
|
Christie's auction is ready to sue Vekselberg
Christie's today announced his intention to sue the Russian businessman Vladimir Vekselberg, who accused the auction sale of fake paintings by Kustodieva "Odalisque in the interior.
As stated in the press service of the auction, painting was returned to the seller only in November last year. On the assurances of representatives of Christie's, analysis of the painting, held since confirmed the fidelity of the original attribution . "Since the fund Aurora has decided to refer the matter to court, without waiting for the re-examination on our part, we have no other choice but to defend its position", - reported in the press-service. (RBC) It turns out that Christie's got the pose and decided to prove the authenticity of the painting? :eek: |
That's fine.
|
Цитата:
The fact that a person, in the jurisprudence of these moments are taken into account. The cause punctures - a low level of knowledge and competence for today's department employees. It would be nice if my information helped Vekselberg. For a refund Burliuk I earned a virtual bottle. It may be, and from the Vekselberg would be different. CW at least ... :) |
|
|
Цитата:
|
|
Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 00:40. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.