Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Art Kaleidoscope (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=236)
-   -   Vekselberg has accused Christie's in counterfeit trade (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=83372)

uriart 19.07.2010 07:13

I was just on those trades.
And I remember how to get Tiesenhausen off work from the wall, people who have it inspected before the sale.
For some reason he did not really want to do it.
In his even raised his voice, which plunged him into the paint.

I'm with Christy for false Burliuk returned the money last year without problems.
Of course it was not as much money as for Kustodiev.

NATA NOVA 19.07.2010 09:53

Цитата:

Сообщение от Guriev, Igor (Сообщение 1198982)
The only problem that I see in this picture - is that she write a better Kustodieva ...

Where did he go, this ingenious imitator?

Technically-possible (but should be "ponyuxat"-t. E. consider "a distance of scent), but mentally, psychologically, a complete compilation. (Here the seven spans do not have to be, it is itself as much yelling) ..

Diletanstvo amatorstvo and can take many different forms ..

As in painting (imitations), and investment ...

Евгений 19.07.2010 13:47


SergeiSK 19.07.2010 19:28

Christie's auction is ready to sue Vekselberg
 
Christie's today announced his intention to sue the Russian businessman Vladimir Vekselberg, who accused the auction sale of fake paintings by Kustodieva "Odalisque in the interior.
As stated in the press service of the auction, painting was returned to the seller only in November last year. On the assurances of representatives of Christie's, analysis of the painting, held since confirmed the fidelity of the original attribution .
"Since the fund Aurora has decided to refer the matter to court, without waiting for the re-examination on our part, we have no other choice but to defend its position", - reported in the press-service.
(RBC)
It turns out that Christie's got the pose and decided to prove the authenticity of the painting? :eek:

Wladzislaw 19.07.2010 21:35

That's fine.

19.07.2010 22:32

Цитата:

Сообщение от Wladzislaw (Сообщение 1200092)
the Court - it is right.

For Lawyers Vekselberg I have described 2 interesting real facts about the recent forgeries, which were on display at Christie's Russian auction. In the subject Fakes ... Fakes ... described 2 cases with false work Popova L. "Birsk Landscape" and the work for Burliuk "Lighthouse". The first was withdrawn on the eve of bidding for a second have been refunded to the buyer.
The fact that a person, in the jurisprudence of these moments are taken into account. The cause punctures - a low level of knowledge and competence for today's department employees. It would be nice if my information helped Vekselberg.
For a refund Burliuk I earned a virtual bottle. It may be, and from the Vekselberg would be different. CW at least ... :)

Кирилл Сызранский 19.07.2010 22:40


19.07.2010 22:48


Wladzislaw 20.07.2010 01:21

Цитата:

Сообщение от OlegTsi (Сообщение 1200142)
For Lawyers Vekselberg I have described 2 interesting real facts about the recent forgeries, which were on display at Christie's Russian auction.

In Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence that has no value. No fake put up for auction will not even be mentioned in court, as they have no relation to the picture Kustodieva /neKustodieva.

20.07.2010 01:32



Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 00:40.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot