This is where you learn about this?
_________________

Do you thanks-666.

Anyone who understands that art - a kind of revelation of God.

Added after 2 minutes
At Alexander Abramovich Kamensky, for example.

It was a good critic.

Where are you from Kamensky deducted such a distinction between critics and art historians?
Himself Alexander Abramovich, Doctor of Fine Arts and Honored Artist of Russia-positioned as an art critic and art historian.

Collection of Articles "Opening day" - is not art history and critical studies.

How to say ... :) "Etude both studies ...

There have been critics who are blamed say Cezanne, then there were others who said that Cezanne fellow, he opened a new view on zhivopis.Kto of them better understand the revelation of God? "That is such an opinion, criticism of fog, for In order to better express those or other group interests, depending on the conjuncture .;)"

Excellent.
This is a critical process alive.
Any art is a form of revelation of God, including the creation of the critic.
If the critic is not a woodpecker, it does not matter how he felt about Cezanne: positively or negatively.
His opinion is always interesting.
This also happens, but I am not interested in such criticism.

Here, for example, milk, Jr., beautifully written in the best Russian journal of all time "Results".

Milk and listen very interesting, he is a brilliant storyteller and clearly highlight key points, although quick to slaughter.

It seems to me that the task of critics to be able to analyze the processes occurring in a specific field of art and based on extensive knowledge of the work of many painters and artists for generations to conclude that the creation of a certain artist or group of artists. study of creative work of artists from different countries and time allows opreldelit degree of originality and lyrics. giftedness certain artist painter. Everything is understood in comparison, but to compare have to be very much to know and keep in mind.
Unfortunately our criticism and art history mired in commerce. and thus lost their outlook and can not compare. Many of knowledge are limited to superficial knowledge of the national art or narrowly professional knowledge given period. The overall disease-complementarity for the money, kills criticism.

Pavel, agrees with almost all your provisions, except that the "originality so gifted." It's more "modern" approach to the artist.

Added after 5 minutes
is interested in unbiased kritik.On can make an artist think, but "in a direction I go, whether in my work" vkusovschiny " and not to change it myself for the sake of fame and money. "Honest criticism is also rare.