I do not "distort", and simply specify.


Added after 5 minutes
And if we talk about taste, then here is a picture
for me is not the "icon" of high taste.

Posted 17 minutes later
Opened and looked.
There's nothing I saw about the fact that "the buyer 90%of cases choose Worst of the proposed"
Saw only:
and the portrait of Count Tolstoy's avatar.

Specify in which time: I do not have any relationship to trade. At home I stuck that on the wall for decades.

There, and will not have this phrase on the first page, strange how you :shy: Open Magazine (click on the name), traverse the links, read, you may be something useful. As I understand you are doing about the same, but in the outback. Look at the "cultural capital". If that is not understood - I beg your pardon, it is difficult to me razbiratsya the habit and did not realize it worth it to me?

Are you about St. Petersburg?

Added after 2 minutes
No, I must confess, I'm in their "backwoods" enlightenment okolohudozhestvennoy or public money has not engaged and did not even dream to eliminate her "stupidity and arrogance."

No, you are very difficult to talk. You are different parts of the Promise stick together in contradictory arguments. This logic is deceptive tactics. These words (I will explain to the readers here), you nadergali of my words and presented them as the position of selling art (artdilerov - so they are called ?)... once doubt creeps in with a decent man ... you really must excuse me :shy:

No, I'm not an artist and seems to hit the wrong way, because there are only two parties - the artists and traders

Yes? And I thought that I'm easy to talk. It is easy and pleasant ...
No?
It's all "remote places ...
You something in the "cultural capital" is good, but here ...

Why come? See the beginning of this post.

What? not?

for these 2 days discovered a new one:
Shemyakin-so is no relation to Socialist Realism does not (and why?)
- That the Socialist Realism - that bjaka shit and nobody wants and no-sales (and the fact that now - the beauty of that?)

-here is unaware that socialist realism - it is the only style (world) 20 century and belongs to the vanguard

-here they told me to read books that really bad (and this forum is useful?)



- And many others. another boring list

From this theme out.
Br-rr ...

Looked.

They gave you some very sensible and absolutely free advice:

In particular, contact the artist. Even given its coordinates. Why is the artist? Because he has a right to know where his picture on the "droit" (there is a point at the copyright).

It is reasonable to ask you about the reasons for such interest to find a picture. And it was another valid point about the low commercial interest in the work among the masses. Explain to you why.
Prompted that under such conditions have portrayed a very high chance to redeem the work inexpensively.

Now last Mona from our "touchy" - first "a dealer bulbs" dubbed :) "and then he ....." you really must excuse me!
Rosa, Ravel and Co resting :D

What-"is"? zagadoShno much. I, too easy, when each
spoken word leads to a discussion of my personal qualities and vices, which many have already seen the (invented). Also a strange feel myself in an unfamiliar place.

And all the time I was trying to justify why. That is to say, and wrote something in 2 subjects, except his. Once because Shemyakina discussed, taking video of my LJ (and not only him as it turned out). Link it does not give as usual, well, God bless her. Well, about the skull and Van Gogh. Like everything in fact, at no one was rejected. ВОБЩЕ no one spoke and I do not know anyone here. WHERE tell me it's all suddenly hung up on me? you here that? you-all in order?