Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Auctions (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=206)
-   -   Catalog Sheets (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=56322)

AlexanderG 10.01.2010 15:48

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky (Сообщение 843752)
Who will distribute the role? First.

Oni sami raspredeliatsia. metodom estestvennogo otbora.

And second: each such "Lecturer" is not often heard in his address: "And you Th-on? Smartest-on?"

Nu mozno ze skazat ': "Da, ia ekspert, spetsialist po dannomu voprosu". Ili budet zvuchat 'ne skromno?

And that of self-intentioned speaker says to himself: "And the horseradish goat accordion?" :D

Takoe toze ne iskliucheno.

A naschiot kataloznyh opisanii, kazdaia professiia imeet svoi slang (professional'nyi iazyk, argo, zargon). Razgovarivaia podobnym obrazom stoliar ne poimiot vodoprovodchika, hirurg fizika, a chelovek neiskushionnyi v deiatel'nosti auktsionov, ne poimiot ih opisanii. Uzkaia spetsializatsiia .:)

Сима 10.01.2010 16:07

AlexanderG, Cyril Syzransky, thanks, understood. Ie this is "attributed Stozharov", with which I began to participate in the discussions a year ago.
It's great, but I think that the lecturer, of course, quickly "tired". It's just a separate paper. + More "goat with Bayan. But if a colleague wants to do it, then you should try.

Кирилл Сызранский 10.01.2010 16:09

Цитата:

Сообщение от Sima (Сообщение 843802)
But if a colleague wants to do it, then you should try.

A colleague wants and waits for questions from participants, but they are not.

Сима 10.01.2010 16:31

Cyril Syzransky, ah-ah-ah! Ie colleague wants all organized themselves. Ie former judge, now known under the nickname of Seema, suddenly "stepped back" and declare: "my name is ....., I am an expert on .... and I testify that yesterday in the directory .. .. I saw the picture, "Tatlin" to play by Maeterlinck. This is bullshit. And to add arguments, links to catalogs and experience. Such is the scenario? But, forgive my cynicism, will deprive your antique dealer and life of intrigue. Themselves first and strangle it. Well, think for yourself. Ie will be a place where sitting on duty, who, as nazhmesh the button, so pop up and gives advice. Boring!. I am so when I go looking for mushrooms, I dream that all mushrooms good food from the trees: I'm here, Grab me. A bad mushrooms so silent and self-destruct.

Кирилл Сызранский 10.01.2010 16:35

Seema, no, Kolegov proposed here to spread scans auction descriptions, where the party, tell us scan, is not very clear to any terms. That's all.

Added after 3 minutes
Цитата:

Сообщение от Sima (Сообщение 843832)
a former judge, now known under the nickname of Shem, suddenly "stepped back" and declare: "my name is ....., I am an expert on .... and I testify that yesterday in the directory .... I saw the picture, "Tatlin" to play by Maeterlinck. This is bullshit ".

This is related to another suggestion of colleagues.
And this proposal was vyzvenno that concrete thing that exists in the real, to discuss "non-specific nikm"-virtual and make a real object "sentence" anonymous.
This, again, another question.

Сима 10.01.2010 17:32

Cyril Syzransky, the first part I have long understood. And for the realization of the second must change the conditions of the forum. I talk on facebook under the name. And let me tell you that here was a virtual life still draws and corrupts. And where you all know in person and in life - of course, is responsible for his words and think hundred times before you speak. Here is another - to speak about other people's wealth, for which nobody knows what and who stands. Too many unknowns. Ie values even in the presence of pictures and more or less coherent description is still anonymous. So in the discussion participants should be entitled to anonymity.

Pecheneg 10.01.2010 21:34

Catalog Sheets
 
AlexanderG offered his services to "decode" zakomuflirovannyh descriptions of lots in the auction catalogs.
Knowing this "language" on which auctions are forced to "speak" (and need to sell and can not get to court), it is possible for themselves at the stage descriptions
identify questionable items.

Alexander assumes the role of decoder? If I understand correctly ..
 but who can guarantee that not seeing things can go wrong ... From this no one is safe ... Example .. Take almost any job on "Gelos" ... In the catalog description is a string "Artist (*.*.******.) on podpisi.Kto I can guarantee that this work is that hudozhnika.Komu believe ... self-titled expert experts "Gelos" or rely on their knowledge and intuition ...

uriart 10.01.2010 21:44

Pecheneg; or rely on their knowledge and intuition ..

That's almost exactly the same and should hope for in the first and second and in any place!

Кирилл Сызранский 10.01.2010 22:02

Цитата:

Сообщение от Pecheneg (Сообщение 844712)
but who can guarantee that not seeing things can not go wrong ...

What kind of message do you speak? This is not about "things", and its description in the auction catalog.

Added after 59 seconds
Цитата:

Сообщение от Pecheneg (Сообщение 844712)
Who will give me a guarantee that this work is precisely this artist.

Not about what "guarantees" the speech was not. Offer assistance.

Pecheneg 10.01.2010 22:32

Catalog Sheets
 
Cyril Syzransky
Not about what "guarantees" the speech was not. Offered assistance

Thank you! Naturally ..


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 07:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot