Leading tried not to show off their questions. Answers are more important. In addition, technology reporters' questions are often placed at the end, to match actual answers (that is to understand - the internal kitchen). And about Ponthieu - it is not important, but the time for Russia's life is very important. Ponty - a kind kontsetrirovannoe education, so they are so different in different situations. It is not fully understood the interlocutor? Even for sure. So what? The interviewer, by the way, awesome - really enjoyed the conversation.

Lead.

Personally, I liked the interview, thank you very much, interesting.

I also liked it! thanks!

It is debatable :) In any case, is where to grow :)

to avoid the disposal of the theme , devoted to the remarkable interview, to the side will try to speak very carefully : "Brothers and Sisters" - the orthodox treatment. So the priest goes to the temple for praying. Stalin, as is known, studied at the seminary, but that his spodviglo the fact that both appeal to the people, do not propose to discuss . It is important that the treatment was, in my opinion, the only correct - whether it was conscious or unconscious, whatever the motives it may have been dictated.
Job Belyaeva I like.

Added after 6 minutes
In the interview I really liked the fact that the interlocutors were talking to understand not only to the initiated, but normal people language. The hundredth time I agree with the maxim "He who thinks clearly, he clearly sets forth. And about tupitsinskogo language - bravo!

Quite sensibly, without hysterics, but not without emotion! In any case, be felt (and this is now rarely meet) that the interlocutors is not only interesting subject of conversation, but the conversation itself. Thank you, Vladimir!

Writer Sergei Popov
 

http://pbwm.ru/articles/ekonomika-obraza-2 Writer Sergei Popov of values in contemporary art.