-------------------------------------------------- -----------
From the book reviews from the exhibition (G. Bruskin "Life Is Everywhere") Pushkin Museum Pushkin (2001)
-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
Bruskin (and Rubinstein, too) should be ashamed. But the money is better than a conscience, is not it, gentlemen?

Alekseev. Retiree
------------------------------------------
Carefully inspected your exhibition. One thing is clear, your boss - the American dollar.

Elena B.
---------------------------------------------
Such daub not enter into eternity.

Wisher

http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=4435
==================================
All this we have already passed my dear Frosya Antip ...

Arkady Petrov on-ARTINFO

http://www.artinfo.ru/artbank/script...c?author_id=67

Purygin Leonid
 

Leonid Purygin (1951-1995) painter, classic Sots art ...
Leonid Purygin was born to a teacher and director of a toy factory in the small town of Naro near Moscow in 1951, before the era of "thaw" of Khrushchev's spring. Environment him since childhood toys mythology, poetry, "wooden Theater" Pinocchio had the same effect on his consciousness, like staying young Kandinsky in a farmhouse, filled with icons.
The cost of work to 240t.ue.
http://artinvestment.ru/auctions/64?...=П&page=8

Eugene Very like. And shove it in a social art does not work, especially with fomulirovkoy "too. Not continue to be amazed by your attempts to compare what is called "apples and oranges."

Zhenya? .. It was cited by Advertising chocolate .. Greetings from Grandfather Freud? Sochi .. the sun .., hormones?

Some are artists known as the great, outstanding, well-deserved ...
Our Leonid Purygin worthy to be called as "need artists."
The man is kind and gentle, which is equally loved and butterflies and people.
And it can dignify as "Confessor Sots Art.

Creativity Mikhail Roginsky I like very much, I had nowhere stuffed, his art is a social art ...
Fully agree with you. (About Leonid Purygin)
plus good mood ..
  Well at least that some of Sots Art, you like, have a look.
Frosya, Could you explain what you mean by the direction of the social art?
===============================================

                  Dip-art: Deep Art of the Cold War
Andrey Kovalev. Russian Journal. Inreresnaya article about a social art ..
http://old.russ.ru/krug/20000820_kov-pr.html

Eugene
===============================================
In my view social art is all that use symbols and cliches of socialist reality, and this trend has been most extensively represented in the adjustment period. But I'm not an expert, and my opinion may be wrong.

Thank you for the article Kovalev. He has over the period of the last 50 years named: the new realism, social art, deep-art, metaphysics, surrealism, abstract art, mysticism. Where can I read: What other areas of art submitted to our modern art, and more in detail - their distinctive characteristics, the authors and major works?
And then all or political grounds conformist non-conformist, or by year-cities.: Confused:

Well, come: before my Roginsky all pop-art sewing, now a social art pasted:)

Do I have to say that I absolutely do not agree to these? But generally speaking, if someone so like, please, as they say, "even though you call a pot, just not put in the oven!

[color="# 666686"]Posted 27 minutes[/color]
Frosinka you sensitive mess:)

Deep-art ", there is no such direction, it is a joke (evil) - or not quite a joke - clever Andrei Kovalev, so you have to throw him out of your list, without delay, and tremble in his hand:)

As compensation for the ongoing censorship I propose to include a rich word "conceptualism" (Kabakov, Pivovarov, Bulatov, Vassiliev, Prigov, etc., etc.).

As pop art, the question was whether the USSR /Russia pop art, remains open. Andrei Erofeev, who organized the exhibition, the 2 back "Russian Pop Art" obviously believed there was. He defended his views in numerous articles and interviews on the subject (they are easily found on the internet). Other art historians and critics (which also can be read on the Internet) believe that it was not. I personally (not that it had any sort were important, I say it's just for information) is inclined to believe that there is no pop-art in there was not, and could not be.

Whoever I will explain the stylistic differences between metaphysics and mysticism in art, I am ready to give out their bins 1 copy of the catalog Roginsky:)

Sots Art - certainly the original direction, which originated in the USSR 70-e gg. Typically, the list of artists of this trend include Milamida and Komar, Lenya juices, Boria Orlova, Sasha Kosolapov, a group of "Nest" (Roshal - Skersis - Don), well beyond, I do not remember or do not know, but they are legion.
I read somewhere that Roginskii influenced the emergence of Sots Art, I do not know how true this is. In any case, it is the trend was not interested, although he adored juices, very fond Roshal - but not as artists Sots Art, and just as insanely talented artists.

Generally, there is such a book, "History of Russian Art" or something like that, write a scholarly lady named Catherine Tar. I have not read it - that's why I have my own ideas - but without a doubt, she understands all of the latest trends better than many (Erofeev also very knowledgeable man, but, unlike the Tar Baby, is not particularly writing).
Here is my modest contribution to help you find the answer to the tantalizing question you are:)

LCR, at the expense of pop art does not agree, at the expense of sots-art part, but everyone has their mnenie.Tem more I just art dealer (art dealer).
The main question was not answered, Mikhail Roginsky? Sots-art, pop art, or simply social realism?
Good article on Michael Roginsky
  http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...985&page=7
-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------
The most important thing in the works Roginsky and here I agree with Kovalev (http://old.russ.ru/krug/20000820_kov-pr.html)
"... in its principle a serious attitude and to the thing itself, and to engage in art ..."

[color="# 666686"]Posted by 51 minutes[/color]
LCR, I read another article (on torchestve Mikhail Roginsky) and realized response, we will not find their questions .. shoot ...
http://www.guelman.ru/culture/review...01/view_print/