îôôòîï in dogonku
 

By the way, the question of the usefulness of viewing small provincial auction. In the picture signed and dated original of Edouard Manet, with expert opinion - EXPERTISE: With a confirmation from Alec Wildenstein, Wildenstein Instutue for Art Research & Development, Paris from 26 September 2006 PROVENIENZ: Mme. Manet, artist's widow. Such a миленькое Happiness 20 x 12 cm or experiment in yaponicheskom style and just what is USD 40 000.

And what is interesting for the expert (Alec Wildenstein), you can write a few words ..? He represents the Foundation for the Study of heritage E. Manet, or is something else?
This collector's son Daniel Wildenstein?
-------------------------------------------------- -----

I will not insisted, but to the best of my data Wildenstein Instutue for Art Research & Development is a purely commercial entity with a small permanent staff composition experts, but also widely employed for the evaluation of different, fairly well-known professionals. Money for the examination did not take the small, boasts a large influx of customers can not, although their track record has some very confronting research. Main specialization - France. Daniel Wildenstein - a son and not even a relative, but rather just the owner of the office, having the right to sign a formal opinion (including other spices).

http://www.wildenstein-institute.fr/

Recognized worldwide structure for scrutiny of many works of French and some European artists, in particular - the French Impressionists.
If you want, for example, sell at a decent price occasionally found among the grandfather of Claude Monet painting of things without the need of this institution is indispensable.

In simple cases where, for example, is given a negative opinion on the price of photos from 150 to 250 euros.

Daniel Wildenstein is a very famous collector of the Impressionists, died in 2001, so I asked Alec Wildenstein is his son? Or relatives.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 37 seconds[/color]
observer, Withdrawn find information about the family. http://www.kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?Do...amp;print=true

say do not say
 

Dear Eugene,
because, as I noted above, my data is fairly scarce, I will not insist on the absence of consanguinity.

It seems that this fragment. You could not photograph the side of the upper and right side?

Yes and no. Yes, and recognized, because it is not fashionable and very cheap, no - because I met (though not often) and frank lyapy from this office. In my opinion IMHO it still falls short of the pathos name "institute" because of their excessive financial orientation.
Sobsno I wish all this to say that in any case, their experience and opinions are always useful, though not perfect. :)

So far, at least until Friday, I can not do anything because the thing is returned to the owner. But the auctioneer promised on Friday to send more details and photos.
Concerning the fragment, then I doubt it - rather it's a bad picture. There's enough normally to be met all the proportions and perspective.

More specifically, can give an example?