Scribe, understood Correctly, but I was afraid that YOU may be misunderstood: as an argument for the authenticity. Appreciate it, but have not found the best options here except to poke the button thank you in your information. Of course it is necessary to recall the prototypes, and compare them with rehashes very revealing, this is a very good visual lesson

Scribe, really understand you! Not finding other ways to publicly admire-pressed "thanks". So you've identified the source falshaka. which glimmer in the brain that flickering form, but not remembered. Probably not even cover redrawn, and reproduction in any n the directory (probably-was?) Usually then the color distortion resp reproduction, and that even more luxurious - size fake coincides with the reproduction window

[QUOTE="Kaestlin;3408691"]there would have to tell you good to stop, because you have a very bad repaint, ineptly-mechanical, leveling the meaning nacions but it's not "poorly-mechanical", and quite a decent copy, with work (as already pointed out to us by the distinguished Scribe) El Lisitskogo for the cover of the book K. Bolshakov "the Sun is on the wane.
Here, a simple comparison shows that no dramatic-there are no fundamental differences :)

Me personally I like the picture, I would buy for myself, even if a copy or just an unknown artist. To accomplish your goal HP suggestion, please.

You are absolutely right. Most likely it is a mechanical reproduction of the picture (PC etc.) and colored... May be issued for "option".