Fantastic logic. How bydto last day of work: (Look for this interview, fross?

Yes, it would be interesting to read. as a leader can not manage their staff?

What was the heterogeneity of the situation?

Eugene, I confess, too, did not catch up. You can once in a mode of opinion to say that there was another in siuatsii and what is written in the examination of paintings Kiseleva?

Eugene, is it right when you ask something to send people to another place? Well, I'm not too lazy, climb, found. Under the paintings were signed by Tatiana Kiseleva Goryacheva. what?

and that there may be interesting? usual farce, which leads to nothing ... poshumyat-poshumyat and forget. And this is what is extremely important for the market, because its outcome will set a precedent. If they would go to jail, then this will start high, claims overwhelm the courts and it is very adversely affect the reputation of our art market, especially for beginners or the public. So you touched it, much more than the planes to Cuba.

I am absolutely in the subject and even they left their thoughts) about the box of wine, of course, I remember. Do not see the refutation?

Vladimir I have found http://www.timeout.ru/journal/feature/2512/6 it was an interview with Vladimir Petrov.

How do you usually like to say: Cuba - this is another topic

We must wait for the sentence, there just will be painted in detail all that the court found :))).
Perhaps that is why the defendant and asked to read out in court only the operative part, that journalists do not smashed ... But, because it kind of case, this verdict will soon be fully appear in many databases.
Most likely, with the production of a sentence is not completed, will certainly appeal to the Moscow City Court (or convicted, or state prosecution will be dissatisfied with the verdict), then perhaps the Supreme. So follow the process, perhaps, have a long time. A general talk and wonder what really happened, especially not acquainted with the case - a thankless task.
Interestingly, a civil action filed in the process? If yes, then it will be interesting, as the court will consider them. Too, is an interesting precedent.