1. "Prints" and "posters", of course, need to unite, "posters";
2. under "photography" is the only original prints. All other "posters";
3. "design" is divided into "dpi" and "services";
4. the category of "art" to delete as meaningless;
5. wueste the category of "print" and "sculpture".

It is strange that Artoil-A not yet voted and did not lecture about kommercheskoy painting and brush work. May at the check-out? :D


And the site is quite attractive - concoret kupitkartinu, artnow, etc...

This is such a good joke or mocking banter?

[QUOTE=artcol;3322931]advice is absolutely correct, but the price may be Neftyanoi@

Аrtcol, if we consider the project through the lens of "RAM-tactics-strategy - tip in the right direction. And when you consider that the ultimate goal is to work with the market, top-presence and profit, to raise funds for promotion will systematically and continuously, and this should be taken into account in cost, and at what expense, it depends on the ideas of authors of the project.
Your vector I like.

Maybe I misunderstood something... of Course, kupitkartinu focuses on more or less known artists, will agree.

But artnow and this site can compete, isn't it?

The work is very serious, I agree. Especially on the part of the independent evaluation, there are many copies will be broken "..left the army left the army.." .
For example, I work only with the artist. Addresses many can't get.

[QUOTE=Кирилл Сызранский;3322571]Aquarius on the website table of contents looks like this:
NEW/TOP/ART/GRAPHICS/DESIGN/PAINTING/POSTERS/PRINTS/PICTURES.
I think You are not quite of the above figured out. What is ART separately, for example? And what, in Your opinion, are the prints from photos and posters? Looked into the DESIGN, and there's some dpi@

The classification was changed several times, but have so far not found the ideal option. In General, it should reflect the specific interests of visitors, so a bit clumsy Painting (tradizionnaya) separated from Art (contemporary), and Posters (cheap copies of papers or posters that can be propagated indefinitely) and Prints (full transfer paintings on canvas or limited copyright series) received individual menu items.

Pictures and Design while as an experiment, they may not really fit into the concept.

Actually, it was the theme. The underlying technical implementation of the idea is ready, it can be felt, the primary content of the work produced, we had to develop mechanisms to issue something more or less interesting and on top of that the site has not been rejected outright by the slag from the first sight.

Now I would like to understand what things are most important at the next stage - how best to organize search quality work, whether to go to the artists themselves, or to connect the gallery?

Is it enough to focus on contemporary artists of Russia, or should we look towards the antique works to develop the secondary market, foreign authors?

Issues with delivery until lie on the shoulders of the authors, but over time we plan to take it on themselves to organize something like a showroom and carry the works with a guarantee of security, at least in Moscow and the Moscow region.

No, of course not. Only in the category "Painting" presents 4225 artists 238366 works. Only painting!
And now I'm just on the first page you see artist Berdysheva and 171 work. Is there something similar or at least the same level to discuss the website?

[QUOTE="John Preston;3323111"]Can I something nedoponimaju@
Alas, it seems so.

And as Antiques will be delivered to the buyers? And where Antiques will take? Or just pictures of these things on the website show will be?