Eugene, whose views are not necessary to disassemble? It would be nice to post the list ... ;)

Talents outstanding former gallery owner, no one thought detract from, but they have, to my regret, many fans. :) For example, in Kiev, some of the current grand gallery owners at the time literally took the leadership of the idea of a forced Marat brendirovanii market aktualschikov through willful purpose-dtsatki artistic genius and the principle of discrimination of their potential competitors, are not included in the calendar.

Incidentally, when the Gelman in the mid-90s justified the introduction of Russia's art space program strict censorship and repression, he argued that this draconian program is designed for a year, and then you can connect the mechanisms of self-regulation of the market. But we see that many years later, the project remained relevant to Gelman.

Another cross-cutting idea Gelman and his supporters (worms?) - An early collapse of centuries-old way of the art market because of improved technology of reproduction. In this connection I should like to quote here an excerpt from the article Yu Avtonomova "Looking at art through the lens of economic theory with the review of alternative views about the authenticity of works of art. But the article struck me as interesting in other respects, so I want it to offer a whole - http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...045#post305045)

Program under the characteristic title "What to do" was published by Gelman in 1998. It has been preserved in the archives of the Art Primer GiF.Ru.: http://azbuka.gif.ru/important/guelman-chto-delat/ Fortunately, Marat did not have enough influence to full implementation of its proposed strategy.

This is what it was about? I think many do not know how I like. Who is it justified and how can this be accomplished?

Art-lover, Thank you for your interesting comment, "do not have to dismantle" the meaning was not a fan of drugoy.Ya Gelman, but rather the contrary.
Best regards.

To quote from an interview of one of the artists M Gelman, A, Ter-Oganyan: "In these works, as it were simulated practice and abuse: abuse of the mother, abuse of religion ... The characters of the Great Patriotic War, etc."

[color="# 666686"]Added after 8 minutes[/color]
Here he was realizing that supporting this kind of "artistic event." I quote further (Ter-Oganyan): "Epatage for me is a form of contemporary art, to continue its Dadaist tradition." This is from an interview after Cetinjski III Biennale (1997), where they performed desecration of icons and threw him out and Metropolitan of Montenegro demanded to close the exhibition ... financed by the Sorosa.Tsitata on Medvedev's book "The Rape of Europa"

Do you think that Judeo-Masonic conspiracy?

I do not know the details of the Soros Foundation and least of all would like to discuss in this vein, it could trigger something like "Sarah" ... I mentioned the name of Soros, because he is a sponsor of "modern art" is mentioned in the book ... The reasons for his interest in this unknown to me. Please note, somehow it turns out that the actual content of this art, ie utterance as a text about something, no one discussed, as if no object ... The scandals come at the direct action ...

Several times heard it was a title of what is happening. Even using the word Satanism. : confused:

No, it's not, that this is Satanism?
But the "Judeo-Masonic"-thing then!
There's the conspiracy, and a secret society, and the blood of Christian children, and generally "they crucified Christ!
And, most importantly, all at once clear, all we can immediately explain ...
The crisis, war, riots, and prices on contemporary art.
Yes, and the popularity of Hirst.

Compelled to quote Timur Novikov, who was the subject of discussion more than a sign: "impudent mockery of the national culture began to be called postmodernizmom.Tlenie, an expansion in Latin - corruption, began in an environment of cultural workers. Western instructors and local support for the corrupt radical corruptionists. Hooligans, perverts , pornographers, drug addicts and Satanists are the heroes of exhibitions, television programs and art magazines. They have stated "actual artists, but the product of their work - modern art, worthy of storage in public museums" ( "The Abduction of Europe").

Not vdayus in subject matter, but Timur Novikov, branding shame addicts - as the French say, "better read this, than to be blind": shy: