Why obhohotatsya ... In the police must provide an expert report that the stolen painting is really Shishkin, and not a copy , and it is estimated as many hang - to.Ved a neat copy in museums and who but the museum staff know that they have hanging there .
As an example . Was in Kiev in the Gold Room in nimizmaticheskom hall and among the coins in the collection notice a copy of the ruble Alexis . To the question , " Why are among the originals - a copy ? " - I answered " no smotritelny The original and the copy looks impressive , it's how much time you have noticed a simple layman , it is not necessary , a coin and the coin , and does not understand in these coins is absolutely nothing to it , and yes it is not necessary .. .. "

The museums are frequent copies /remakes /reconstruction /dummies , it is common practice .

Pecheneg ,

What and from whom the expert opinion may give the museum the investigation. While the picture is hung in the museum named no expert report was not necessary. And when it was stolen as the conclusion of a lack of things to do ? By blurred photo and blind registration card glubokosovetskoy pores ? Well, the same nonsense . There is a stolen item , it is necessary to search for anyone whatever it was . Locate and then the examination will be conducted according to which it is found : 1. what does that mean stolen. 2 . whether it is stated (because of the cost of the stolen depends term).

A statement that the thieves falshak not take, right in practice , from a legal point of view is not wealthy , the thief could rely on the fact that " bad lies ", not a painter , could be mistaken , etc. Simply put, " is not an argument ."

Berdan rifle issued to her though?