I would have added that, according to current law, only the heirs and registered funds may publicly challenge the fake. And their opinion takes precedence over the opinion of the experts ...

It so happens that the surprising number of works held by the heirs at times less than other people are . A control process heirs Pts . wants. Have a moral right . But it does not always work . Often, the nature of children to rest. <! - ~ 1 ~ -> And the rat race begins . Manage the fund is a difficult task . It's all a fine line .

Suppose that the law is not perfect, but thank God he is.
And while the pressure of public opinion whether, under the influence whether other factors not taken over by another law that should be respected, that is.
Although an opinion nowhere with no getting around it.
And that's fine too.

Do not forget about the DROIT DE SUITE .
As the old joke: "Ten little old ladies - the ruble, a citizen of the judge."
<! - ~ ~ 6 ->

hQUOTE = "Eriksson; 2603471 " ] Do not forget about DROIT DE SUITE. As the old joke [/QUOTE]

Exactly! And the heiress will decide " how many rubles it needs for the old lady ," as a joke

But I also wondered : "The Committee Burliuk " is not a fund ( within the meaning of European and Russian law)

So Jane Doe may well still inflict criminal proceedings against directors committee Burliuk and all other
Provided that it is - the interested party !