Meister, I would have loved to Magritte's "Key to the fields" and something from the series "Day-Night" - is a very important work. And we must give names, in the case of Dali, for example, they are simply necessary, because they are part of the work.

take into account the remark about Dali, but was again looking for a name, could not resist, sorry, spread more ... amazing things, surely you do not agree with me?

and a ten-)) all, not anymore)))

No agreed - amazing.:)

and a little more of my favorite Magritte: D

That beautiful Magritte, and those still - amazing.:)

fross, I remember how I was at one time it was struck by the work "The key to the fields of" Magritte .. I think it is much more than just beautiful) Do not you think?

In Rene Magritte I really like one thing:
"Happy giver" creation date unknown
"Inside out or outside in? Carefully drawn details, clarity, as in a dream. New moon: the night sky of your consciousness, sleeping self. The light in the windows of houses: No obstacles do not interfere with the inner vision."

No, you know interested in surrealism, I was pretty fast. Worthwhile to see the work live. Not only that they do not differ from fine art and even after two or three is so boring. Well, as if the same trying to pull a rabbit out of the same hat.
Magritte liked me more. It is not so literal, escapes.

fross, very strange. because I get bored on the contrary to the majority of the classic Impressionist paintings, and even I sometimes tire ... look not delayed, all the same, saw, understood, and went on ... and vice versa syurreliasty leave the ground for study, configure certain thoughts, their works are mysterious and unusual ... not in their everyday life, inherent realism ...