And me and craquelure seems artificial.

Edward, IMHO it's not Kostroma Vinogradov.

- Contact Members Maskit http://forum.artinvestment.ru/member.php?u=344791
Have gone through a lot of work Vinogradov. He was doing his album. Naturally very familiar with both the artist and his paintings of different periods.

- See forum member Alexander Lyudmirskomu
I know he knows the artist and also did his exhibition
This is his report of the sale of the work of Vinogradov
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=121533

Well, not in Kostroma is you go .... Ineta the artist can not be ...
Examination did not pay off. He ( Kostroma Vinogradov), the money is not worth it when it makes sense to do.

There's not only that, but also the craquelure some strange, it's too " same " ...
And then it was a natural number can not be on hardboard , especially in the " cloth " side. Painting itself does not look like it is too inert, and the composition of the landscape in this website is always more complex, and blue ... ?
More add - Size hardboard too big for a sketch, and the wizard did a lot of work on the canvas.

Craquelure natural as it can be artificial?)))

As for the signature on top of craquelure, arm the tool and will update!

There are technologies "manufacturing" craquelure.

"Armed " best microscope Stemi 2000 -C ... :)>
Although , believe me, in this case, and without any Zeiss clearly seen in the photo.
A craquelure than "natural" ( so-called. Cr -p aging), it is more technological, traumatic etc ( this is - by birth) . And he has thrown , is divided on the basic physical characteristics ...
And yet, as noted earlier , there are rogues , rascals and various methods of creating artificial craquelure ... ( but still under the microscope you can see everything ).

And it really does not make sense , so to speak , " craquelure " such a great job ! for what? raise the price tag on a pair of tyrov ? No Dear, craquelure his ! Related to this is no fraud took place, and it craquelure in tobacco smoke ) )) but the signature is verified .

Edward , craquelure on your picture - not artificial. He - Technology ( of which I have had the honor to report to you .) And to argue with this at least - is unwise.
Your , your own! No one takes :)>.

In no case do not argue with you :shy:> Just to inform you, so to speak about some of the stories!
Tell me please, if the examination of this work, in which the amounts can not do?

PS: In any case, thank you very much))

Examination on this artist perform well out of place , Edward ! Subscribe to the comments previously made by forum users. The only correct way - look at the outputs of the artist , that he confirmed the authenticity of the work !

Added after 13 minutes

That's right it was said.
:cool:>