Doubt Cyril is empty.

Kryzhitsky
 

good night,

1. Picture this size can hardly be called rather sketch.
2. And then the frame, if you are selling sketch ?
3. Determine the authenticity of the photos on the internet - is a "super ", I think that neither the Tretyakov or Grabar would not go on like that.
4. Aivazovsky, Clover , Brovary, Kryzhitsky etc. forged in life (for some news? ).
5. Why not offer up for auction ? Gelos , Mangum ARS , Cabinet , shovels,
Shishkin Gallery , etc.

Sincerely,
Sergei

It should be very sorry to see that studies K.Ya.Kryzhitskogo (and Voronezh , written in the estate of Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna , and zacherenskie and Ternovskii ) in museum collections are hardly represented . But I saw them a couple of dozen at least. In good (mostly - St. Petersburg ), in private collections. I was lucky .
 Incidentally, in the present studies ( which is not bad even seen the photographs of this quality ) flawlessly everything itself marking and signature Clerk V. Ivanov , and the signature " insti dyval schego exhibition" Artists N.Tsirigoti et caetera , et caetera ...

 
here . can be compared to
 Perhaps better photos and dispel my doubts, but now they are present, repeat .

Uh-huh. Compare. And " this one ", and six more available at my disposal (and not such luxury ) Ternovskii studies.
However, this argument seems to me absolutely absurd. If something I do not know for sure - I prefer not to engage in conversation . And so as soon as I say anything definitely , so - to have a good reason. We are closing on this, if you do not mind. :)>

And I, in fact, do not argue , and tried to explain the author of the topic and the doubts once wrote :
Apparently , I need an ophthalmologist prescribe new glasses with more diopters. :D>

Kryzhitsky
 

From notebooks kizhek Sergei Dovlatov (one of his friends): "I saw people who had seen Lenin."
I'm talking about expertise, and are you talking about?

Sorry, did not understand - it matters to me?
Today it discussed the possibility to auction - take in May.

I may try one more time to photograph the back side - but I only have the phone on hand, despite the fact that the painting itself was photographed specially invited a man of very good camera. Backside photographed much later , when I realized that the picture is made Kryzhitsky . Hence the difference in picture quality.

Kryzhitsky
 

No, not to you, but to the "experts photo".
What kasaetstya work, expertise is required if you want to sell.
My job is not interesting.
How old are you if the work hung in your home for over 100 years?

Well, ladies, do not ask such questions , the normal of the middle-aged. Picture of my great-grandfather bought .