This includes 100%of this art. Even the cost of two paintings by the same author of the same size , can and should differ significantly.
But it is possible to calculate the price of the product . :)> If someone does not distinguish between the word and work product , it may of course resort to the method proposed here . :)>

Victor_art, thank you very much for Vassiliev, I did not know his ignorance of it!
what artist .. what purity and perfection!
... To tears.

 Thank Victor_art and Seriy, which once again drew attention to the amazing artist. Striking three-dimensional, vivid pictures . Fantastic , the artist ( to my taste).

So how many square feet in the paintings Vasilyeva and what we apply the factor to them ! ? :)>

Tretyakov ...
Room number 18 ...
"Wet Meadow" ...
"In the Crimean Mountains" ...
"The Thaw" ...
Take a look ...
You will not regret ...

I remember. I have about this artist Hugo Schauffler with whom I " walked " to the Tretyakov Gallery. Pictures of him certainly I liked, but for some reason, described in this thread count , hooked me even more. :)>

The only pity - all these things under glass ...

Fed, your mathematical work more to appreciate the Chinese comrades ... It remains only to somehow fit into it and roulette oblige artists to march in formation :)>
You are trying to one originally flawed system to pull another vicious method initially , but the singing BG - " minus to minus - not always a plus " ...

Similarly, less or even Kostandi Levitan .
This example only proves the correctness of the approach - a rating it would be a high position is not occupied. And for the picture would have paid a "fair " price , with knowledge , and so did not pay.
Who benefits?

This is not a specific conversation .
How much is exposed , which in the rankings, what other auctions and sales ...

This is not for the artists, their work how much to sell their goods. This technique , for buyers to lose money is not - no picture of divorce or when assessing the possibility of selling in the future.

Moreover, all these artists sentiment about the cost of invaluable art and their incredible work in their environment is good , but not when a man spends his money for his work in the gallery, and a month later, another sees almost the same , too - in the 3 times cheaper . Well, clearly , and his work is not the mother of history is valuable, as sunk 99%over 50 years in the history of art .

 :)> :)> :)> I know the class of artists who did not in the rankings. They did not stand ?

We can only quote myself :


And it turns out, and a five-minute masterpiece and sketch in the same price ! This is of course not ...

You just have not read the proposed method . There are answers to all these weird questions.
Not necessarily stay in the ranking of the artist. You can simply use the Description of the rating categories, if the experience enough. Or adjust their assessment on the basis of the description of categories , as itself description is good.

It is clear that "masterpiece" and the sketch is not one price. Ratings refer only to " important works Artist" on the existing now stage of its rating category.

By the way, many "masterpieces" is issued in your environment on the mountain ?