iside, and perhaps in the article does not say about the alleged authorship of the works of three of the four?

Here's a quote:

Il percorso espositivo, diviso in sei segmenti, s'apre all'insegna dello stretto rapporto che legò il Pontormo ed il Bronzino: un legame talmente serrato che è ancora controversa l'assegnazione di tre dei quattro tondi con
Evangelisti che ornano la Cappella Capponi in Santa Trinita, utilmente esposti all'altezza dell'occhio dell'osservatore e dando conto - tramite fotografie - del loro allestimento originale.

zarajara, Yeah, you 're quite right.
fabosch, so what, it's just an article about the exhibition, there does not reflect the views of experts, who for those who opposed, and why, and how all the experts involved in attribution . 1 for and 5 against , or vice versa , and 5 for 1 against .

As far as I know the Italians, and I can imagine the logic of their actions, if you had put , it means more sure than unsure. Although , in the particular case , may not be the case . :)>

And if the decision taken by the exhibition of ethnic Hungarians living in Italy, the opinion in support of his argument authorship should ask who drank a couple of times "current" ?

I've something to the message did not quite understand . Hungary, Italy ...
Part of modern Italy has long belonged to the Austro-Hungarian Empire - that's what I know.

I do not understand the Hungarians of particular relevance to these artists?
all the Italians?
to art?
:)>