I love you tired?

There is still, it's not all.
But today you have to go to another event, such a life is vain.
Tomorrow will lay out the rest, not so much.

What is a short summary?
Go to the exhibition necessarily myself again I'll go for sure.

Here you do it, and gave:


 
:)>

It is strange that they are enrolled in the School of Paris Goncharova and Van Dongen.

So what is the "Paris School"?


It is clear that the boundaries are blurred and the Paris School are artists who came to Paris from other countries.

And yet, Van Dongen and Goncharov - no not the "Paris School."

Constantine, thank you so much for the excellent quality of the photos !

Picasso's number 3 from the message number 8 is called Friendship and listed in the Hermitage and the Hermitage in the list of organizers do not.
 Chirico - two colored shapes , from the constant exposure of the Pushkin Museum , m e the word " finally" sounded suddenly.

Exhibition amazing! "In Moscow , In Moscow , In Moscow!" :-)

I immediately sent an amendment to the names.
Thank you.
But at the same time wanted to give you a couple examples of how it looked on the plates . Some variants of the names just like the famous quote from the movie :
Добавлено через 22 минуты
Continue.

1.
Larionov

2.Sonya Delaunay

3.
Diego Rivera, Maria

4-5.
Shterenberg

6.
Yakulov

7.
Marevna "Portrait of Soutine"

8.Gudiashvili

9-10.
Gudiashvili

Добавлено через 8 минут
And the final touch:

1.
Shterenberg

2.
Maria Vasilyeva

3.
Kikoin

4.
Orlova Khan "artist Vidhof"

We continue.

1.
Larionov

2.Sonya Delaunay

3.
Diego Rivera, Maria

4-5.
Shterenberg

6.
Yakulov

7.
Marevna "Portrait of Soutine"

8.Kakabadze

9-10.
Gudiashvili

And the final touch:

1.
Shterenberg

2.
Maria Vasilieva

3.
Kikoin

4.
Orlov, Hana "artist Vidhof"

Thank corrected.

On the first impression of the exhibition. Despite the breadth of falling under the concept of the Paris School of represented artists interested in the course, those whose work is not often seen in person. And there had accumulated enough. What to say about painting. Marginal painting in the long run (let's argue.) But even among the outcasts have their fellows and instigators. Of these acts in front of all of course Soutine. Perhaps the most vibrant and subtle even in the transfer of the most characteristic. Face, hands and the rest of the line between them is not more than the background. Fujita liked some romanticism, "a beautiful hip line." Emotional Kikoin. Peyzazhik he's good. Van Donengen against the background of the School of Paris, just as powerful classic Fauve. Jules Pascoe called associations with Degas. U Kisling is working fine in color. About Chagall and Picasso, and talk so much. From the sculptures more than any other fancy "Muse" Brancusi. That's really probably the product from which nothing can be abated, but it is a sign of genius. Paris School successfully completed the, what started impressionism, but rather became his successor. Since the local color has been broken, had to destroy the shape of the linear tsvetovozdushnuyuperspektivu, planned, three-dimensionality that successfully and was sacrificed to razvyazannosti Personality and permissiveness of the creator-artist with pretensions to originality and supported by gallery owners, Marchand invisibly behind each work of artists of the Paris School. :)>

This is good, only marginal artists, writers, located on the border of different social groups, systems, cultures, norms, values ​​and create a real, art, in my opinion.