Healthy logic. Unlove expert from the directory (pdcherknu, I still think it lazhovym) not on the basis profneprigodnosti, and on the principle of "hurt me."
What kind of rating experts then can we talk? Let's hold beauty contests or competition Lapushka year. "
They are for Breit experts may be more effective than their real expert skills.
 Unfortunately the trouble, in my opinion antikvrnogo community that it is too amenable to the emotions at the expense of professionalism. If there had been oiled machine out of the market charlatans of all sorts, but, alas, it will remain my girlish dreams.

Totally disagree with you! I watched his film about forgery experts "Scary Movie"-a very funny filmets. Recommend

Sm.zdes-www.russianartmedia.com Video RussianArt.TV film "Bugs, or a scam."
Renowned expert TG Petrov, an expert debunks the mafia. Pay attention to the text from the author at the beginning of a film about the expert Vladimir Petrov

[QUOTE="K-Maler; 1512191]Ie
not just art history diploma or training courses for examination "(as they begin to spawn).[/QUOTE]

It is not enough, yes, we must still pass [URL="http://rosohrancult.ru/projects/expert/"]certification[/URL] in Rosokhrankultura.

Write about profneprigodnost Glebova not entirely ethical.
Therefore, only private.
And as for the production know who had the opportunity to communicate with her during the examination.
In short no comment.

from the Russian Nesterov is ....
but I would add a couple more names ...

Who, if not secret, but most interesting is why.


Because I'm in the selection of characters in the directory sincerely do not see the logic.

100!
That is exactly what situation.

is in the directory - Goldovsky Grigory Naumovich
Head of the Department of Painting XVIII-XIX centuries, the State Russian Museum.

 What kind of logic do you mean - the formal, mathematical, abstract, dialectical, multifunction ...

For us, the new collectors and buyers is important uznas opinion of professionals of experts from the directory. Objective assessment of their knowledge or not.
And get involved in controversy - not ochem simply no time or desire ... Thank you.
Sincerely, Artem

I'm not the tolerate controversy "about nothing". The fact that I did not see the logic "means that in my view, a set of names is quite accidental. Why, so if we talk specifically, LV Gelenek (GRC) is, and IE Lomize (THG) do not (to me they seemed quite in the same category as age and professional). Or why the list of experts on the chart is not OP Khromova (RSL)? Well, later in the same spirit. Therefore, the question "why" for me the main one.
I suggested why it (because the directory is made irresponsible manner), but can me someone's eyes open?

Because Roshchin not think Lomidze be worthy of inclusion in this list. That's from his recent interview, there was already a link to the forum:
http://antikvar.ua/publications/1822