What amateurish prattle ... :)

Listen , redbor, you zaregtstrirovanny on this forum in January 2009 , did all that time being here so you do not understand at least basic things ? Why then come to our Investing in art ?
Bredyatinu read your ignorant a shame .

so do not read.
Why read, if not able to answer a simple question amateurish?
:)

Do you think I'm here for the whole world to shame you'll be explaining the ABCs?

2 x 2=4, with a straight face?

It is not necessary to untwist the cost of tens of millions of $?
Why not?
Strange logic , it is evident and clear to everyone , for some reason it is not necessary to unwind , let sold for next to nothing (well, everything is relative of course)?

Can not answer because you do not have an answer . Repeat the pattern of " take and unwind" anyone anyhow to at least 20 000 0000 $ you obviously can not. Then why this conversation?
Rothko rest does not , this may answer why he had so much? Excites, makes to talk about himself , and then the pair of triple lines on the canvas.

Because it is virtually impossible.
Aivazovsky the market very much, and millet is not: only in the current year to date was 28 paintings at auction and half of them were not sold, and leave the rest were from 20, it seems so long. and 100-120, rare things (not the marina, for example, or specific kinds of places - Italy, Turkey - "View of Constantinople and the Bosporus ", for example, leaving a record in a little over 5 million) went, of course, more expensive.
And all of the lessors Aivazovsky to Sothebys and Christies and a half years in advance, and Christies, for example, its only takes "Aivazov", this year only two of them and placed (one sold for 265,250 pounds).

But theoretically raise prices on up to 20 million could be spent a certain number of million for the purchase of his current work. At some point in this world of buying someone may vsrepenetsya and also connects to the buying - buying a second there, and then the third, will begin trading, grow, and results.
But it is, in theory any concerns at all " if my grandmother had a beard ".
 :D

Yes , I also know about the queue for Sothebys, on the other hand when you go to " antique shops " ( by the way will be opened soon 20-28 October 2012 ) and you see the same pattern from year to year, then the question of why - all in a voice howl of a large deficit in the market including the first names of the 19th century .

Not Rothko, but adnaznachna, a masterpiece.
:)

I'm not sure that much modernist notion of "understanding."

Do not be ridiculous, Cyril If your post is written over three lines without errors - most likely it is, as already observed
 - Rewritten by you from any article or book, and given as an own "thought"!

Rothko makes you say about yourself? Or those to whom the talk and hype earn?
 I do not understand is elementary. Since then, all of a sudden, "paintings" Rothko surged to tens of millions and enriched the owners, who bought them for thousands?
  As correctly stated in the review: "Rothko's paintings became the attribute of high status of their owners'
Interestingly, one understands real Rothko painting?
Someone can tell which one it work better?
so to say the "tip of creativity." :)
 Here's a picture Rothko. Who can determine how well it is written?
It is a masterpiece or a work-through thing Rothko?

I absolutely nenravitsya of Mark Rotko.I my comprehension of their high cost.