If discard irrelevant in this paper paraphrases (like draperies ), then the thing would have been quite good ( ie good ) . A sort of aesthetic completely oglamurennogo academicism . But more pleasant than Dubosvin . But for my taste the taste problem is detected :D >

Drapery under her feet was also because he is her special pririsoval then , but it would really be noticeable that naturschitsa on the floor stoit.A it says that all this was written with the pictures , but apparently, from this will not go deneshsya.S kind are few rabotaet.No as flirting model (and it should not ) and how he looks at her from under his cap appreciatively and mixed - I like it .

Perhaps under the feet of something like the shell ( not the porcelain :D> ) was . Then the artist has removed and thrown under the feet of drapery . No , good job . My congratulations , Alex Golovin!

She stands there not on the same plane with the other figure, as it were, above. Apparently this is a bug when transferring photo images onto canvas. Word painting involves painting from nature, the living letter, live convey emotions. Exclusion of photorealism style or conceptual arts where the actual transfer of photographic or video images thematically grounded and has his plan. Therefore, in the so-called figurative, realistic, classical painting painting from the photo as a surrogate for the type water + alcohol + dye instead of the real cognac or wine. Incompetent for what is the difference from what degree to get?.
You can still understand the self-taught, osoobenno western where the school figure zero, and to draw men hochetstsa.

Geniuses become one, but usually estimated for some reason the thousands.
:confused:>

I see a long time in the current art of such a phenomenon, I do not know what to call it, when a terrible performance, huge amounts titanic complex topics for which easily takes the artist and for 2-3 years already halts for his work on these topics all the Arena, any then pustotu.2-3 will be held again and a riding school and a year later again Manege. A painter 40 nebolshim.Ego naturally sees the power and it works for her. He has the whole gray and dead eyes, but it all possible regalia of power. Muscovite Vasily Nesterenko of these Ryzhenko and Paul, too, and many others. Alexey Golovin of St. Petersburg's probably too such titan.Vyzyvaet respect fanatical attitude towards work, diligence and eerie more than the artist has to sacrifice for the sake of work, but the meaning of all these complex issues for which these artists come from somewhere to disappear and only the uniforms, guns, smokes, banners, tunics, bows, armor, etc., and it harms the development of Russian art, if the artists themselves rank as, apparently, to the first issue in this case.
Still, we still have a long drive to get closer in some small way to Ivanov and Surikov, reservoir, and Deineka Korinu.A can not get closer than ever.
And yet, as my favorite teacher when killed and poisoned river, the first thing out of it leaves precious ryba.Uha of ruff and perch, too personal, but sturgeon have drifted from nas.Tochno the same with painting, the most important and expensive in iskusstve.Hotya can such subtleties in this topic and unnecessary.

Interview with "Hellas"
 

Interview with "Hellas" Summer 2011. № 21



image p.40-47.

PDF version of the journal (64 MB):

http://www.ellada-russia.ru/magazine/download/2847

slide show
 

that something like a slide show of my works:

http://youtu.be/pcU4ZXvi8gk

still life:

http://youtu.be/X_rhKYn-xUc

Personally acquainted with and I know Pesikovym art of Repin and Mylnikova.Grustno and sad look at what you've shown!

First read all this fascinating dialogue and tell, too.
In principle, I agree with all, but ...
I do not agree that the artist can draw a first-class and working with color. In each figure I have something to irritate a heel, then waist, then chest incomprehensible, everywhere some flaws. In Rubens and Caravaggio such defects do not exist, not to mention Michelangelo or Da Vinci. More precisely, they can also be slightly wrong, but understand art, it's all leveled out, fits into the overall picture is harmonious. Same with the light-anywhere some oddities.
With color, everything is just as something is wrong. Neither picture is not like the color. Hence the dislike of the Impressionists, from a lack of ability to enjoy color.
Personally, I do not see any technical problems to write smoothly and contrast, but many people assured me that this painting plohoprodavaemaya. Here, go and look at Artnau page authors of Dutch still lifes, entirely smooth unsold work for many years. Yes, they cost several scroll thousand dollars, but if unsold, what's the difference ck worth?
 And here was made the opposite view. I'd love to know, whether or not such a good painting is bought, as the Fed? Here ARTMANEZH barometer of commercial styles, there is a similar painting or not at all or very little. If it sold well, the whole Arena would be filled up by the most rafters.
 In the U.S., I can assure such a painting can only be found in second-class art galleries - not by Caravaggio, a painting by Caravaggio, t e a smooth and contrast. I'd love to hear the opinion of our esteemed dealers and gallery owners on the commercial side of this style.

An artist, I wish you every success! If a painting to buy, then it someone decorates life, then performs its function!
Critics are almost always right, especially on this site, where every second person really understands the art. But the artist does not paint for the critics, most importantly, demand.