That's funny.

[QUOTE="Igor Gurjev, 1211981]Message from OlegTsi
Especially watching the book "I. Mashkov from the series the artists of our century. (The Church of Hagia. Moscow, 1977).[/QUOTE]

Dear Mr. [B]Igor Guriev[/B]. With all due respect to you and sympathy to your posts (except for the last few), I gave you the opportunity to very nice, in a diplomatic way, "jump off the topic." But you are taking the position of his release in the bushes, continue to speak in my address to cling to my words. I'm for you and asked you to calm, very gentle way, do not continue this baseless discussion that out of your mouth has already started to imitate nonsense. [QUOTE=OlegTsi;1211082]So, for peace in the forum and continue the theme Vekselberg this topic with Mashkov you do not continue.[/QUOTE]

Only in a state of deep intoxication, which often leads to sudden use of "Albany" language in the Russian-language forums, you can not see the writing in black and white. What do you cling to the words? Did I call the book Sarabyanovskoy? You do not see that the name D. Sarabyana given in parentheses after the words "from the series?

[B]specifically looked Book I. Mashkov "a series of artists of our century. (The Church of Hagia. Moscow 1977).[/B]

In the same train state "olbanizatsii" You allowed yourself to contact me at [B]YOU[/B] and take this nonsense.
[QUOTE=Guriev, Igor;1211982]Comrade Oleg.
Do not be nervous you so.
I vyskzaal honest opinion - not just myself.
Why are you so excited for?
If conscience is clear, then why be excited?
(In Albany: vozbuzhdatstso.
In french: s'excitér)[/QUOTE]

Do we know? We met somewhere? Friends? Finally, comrades? Is it so decided to communicate in a cultural society, where are you do not know the people? Where can you teach this? Where one another accessed through "[B]friend[/B]"? I noticed that you are very often used this expression, it is probably very close to you in spirit and essence.

Why do you allow yourself to gain all the forum about my state of excitement or nervousness? I marantic not writing and being on the forum did not allow myself to enter into "olbanizatsii. You've read that you are in his latest report. It's crazy verbiage! On the nervousness and excitement suggests a diametrically opposite conclusion.
Note that I always behave in a very polite way, I respect the messages of different levels and never lose my sense of tact. If I see the truth - to go public, and not holding back.

[QUOTE=Guriev, Igor;1210122]but it is not Mashkov.[/QUOTE]

You must understand that his statement about the falsification of Mashkov you and your friends people you "a lot of respect," a unique chance to make a new turn in the history of art. If your application is truthful, you have the chance to be one of the defendants a new, very temperamental stories related again to the same London. Do you have a moral right to hide this pretsendentny in the history Mashkova-Sotheby's fact?

It's a pity that now is the holiday season. At the forum there are not too many active participants, but they come back in a month to computers and will read about this story. [B][SIZE="4"] (or left? And, forum, where you ???)[/SIZE][/B]

Since you are again forced me to unsubscribe and to justify himself to forum users for your biased statement to my address (the more so that my message is not for you), I have no choice as to postpone all further communication to a new forum for forging paintings Mashkova I I'll create tomorrow.
There will continue to discuss, since you seem to misunderstood and underestimated my gentlemanly action - close the discussion of your unfounded opinions.
And if I'm wrong - it forward, "For the truth", as there were always close to you in spirit to Comrades. And if you find yourself mistaken, the need to rebut it before the forum and all those who will follow closely the discussion in a new topic. I am convinced that the price for a painting at 3.691 million U.S. dollars and will add serious about etiquette in this subject, in any case you is accurate.

P.S. Message to all forum users.

I blundered badly, leaving the book Mashkova home, but it takes up the unsubscribed messages. The series, which includes book "Ilya Mashkov is called" Masters of the century ", not" artists of our century. " If it offends someone's ambition - I beg your pardon.

In the photo:
1 - Book Cover
2 - Inventory, who developed the series (especially for olbantsa ):D

Honorable OlegTsi, there's another good book (useful for attribution Mashkova)
The book, the author Pospelov GG "Jack of Diamonds" (Primitive and urban folklore in the Moscow Art 1910-s). Publishing House "Soviet Artist" in 1990.
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------
In the book, there are a lot of interesting information on the issues discussed still lifes Konchalovsky, Mashkov.

Someone is. Read. :)
You want to hear their opinion?

Added after 2 minutes
What to say?
Still see the arguments of the parties.
Your backed up by specifics, the same arguments Igor Gurieva on this picture there are:

And very good.

Catalog Mashkova (which I've got since the release) was Irina Bolotin.

As far Pospelov, I saw such scandalous its attribution "Mashkova" it is better not to remember.
Several years ago, looking at Novodel "Mashkova with attribution Pospelov, I said to someone Shovelenu, in Hall Hotel Drouot:

- Mr. Shovel, shame on you display such as Mashkov?

Comrade Shovel angrily glanced briefly and clearly and said:

- Do not want to - do not buy.

But is that at Sotheby's, it really can be confused with Mashkov, so that everything is in order.

Bolotina, Pospelov, Shovel ... :)

What all this is related to that still life Mashkova?
Did not arrive with his Shovelenom attributed.