Yes, my God, are you.
But think it Mashkov, but I will not bother.

We live in a democratic society, I expressed my opinion, you expressed your, I take into account your, you (probably) take into account the mine, talked and went ...

I absolutely have no desire you (and others) than to persuade.

Do you want to - listen, you want - no.

I do not care. Edited by admins ... run up ...

I said (and my friends too), everything else - your business.

You, no one forced to do anything.

But this is not Mashkov.

Is it blind faith? All possible with an accuracy check.

Especially watching the book "I. Mashkov from the series the artists of our century. (The Church of Hagia. Moscow, 1977). They all clearly described. Were Jack of Diamonds exhibition in Moscow and St. Petersburg and in 1910, 11, 12, 13, 14 respectively. Pictures Mashkova held under different numbers - from 10's to 200's, as evidenced by the labels society with numbers.

There was and Exhibition in Amsterdam, as in 1913. Several paintings Mashkova were represented in it. Some of them stayed after the show in galleries in Amsterdam, one of them in the collection of Boffa (Boffie). There are in the archive Mashkova inventory picture on the photo - "Flowers in pots, oil on canvas, portrait, signed upper left Ilya Mashkov. Dated around 1908-1909.


And what nuances you have in mind precisely in this case?

You are not interested, no matter (your words).
Therefore, for the sake of peace in the forum and continue the theme Vekselberg, the topic of Mashkov you do not continue.
Anyway, at this moment of truth on the side of the seller, broker (Sotheby's), and for today's owner. To suggest otherwise - at the moment there is no argument.

And the answer to your question will find in this book (if you are still interested).

Thanks for the discussion of all the benefits and successes.

My "novel" does not in any way has a direct bearing on the discussion paper.


On the occasion bought a large landscape for ornamental purposes.
Already found a home on the back of the label "Baltic Exhibition in Malmö (Sweden) in 1914.
Interest has even opened a theme: http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=61011
After some time, purchased in Sweden, the original catalog, to my surprise there is not the author, not the work was not there.
On the forgery was not going to question, stuck curiosity.
Found in the same Swedish report on the exhibition, a three-volume, 1800 pages.
Interesting thing. It provides information on the strategy and tactics of selection of works named for the actors, presented copies of the contracts between artists and the organizers of the details. Even with prescribed size boxes for packing, the maximum weight and diameter of the attachment /ears under the hook of the crane.
Learned that about 60 -70%of authors were invited by organizers. The festival organizers paid for packaging, shipping, insurance works by a guest author and issued him a ticket on the house. The remaining 30 - 40%of the items was a better choice from the recommended artists from the participating countries or specific artistic societies. To create this "fund" of 30-40%were brought works of different authors are 2-3 times more than necessary - by choice. Artists /society drove these works at their own expense and at your own risk.
All these works have labels, although the lion's share of the exhibition was not involved. Part of the work was decoration exhibitions of agriculture and industry.
This exhibition, first of all commercial activities.
Organisers immediately concluded a contract for the sale of "free" works. By the way, then take 10%of the mediation.
Behind the scenes, there was a trade. In the Internet has found extract of customs proceedings between the German painter Max Liebermann and customs, on the fact that the design works for the temporary export occurred lining. The declaration was less work than in the baggage carried lishek.
They took lishek and the fact that these works have a label, it is very likely.
The exhibition in the financial plan had failed because of the outbreak of the First World War. Dealers, as usual, pinned hopes on the sale, after the exhibition, presented by her artists. There have been a reserve prikupleny work, and labels. Such a label attached to the work the weight and price. I found the hood of the trial, which was filed with the court to the dealer who sold the work of German artist who was kind of like on this show and had a label, but how it got out, that she was not there.

In general there are nuance. ~ <!--~ An ->

Comrade.
I have not received such a sea-okiyana pleasure, from your message.
By the way, you remember what the most famous Russian painting was exhibited in Malmö and was there before, I think, 1954?
(I hope the answer is not expected, since I moved to Albany (okiyana), and this is eternal koraetstso banned).
I guess if you go to the Old Church Slavonic, it too will match.
In general, farewell, friends.
Posted 7 minutes
Comrade Oleg.
Do not be nervous you so.
I vyskzaal honest opinion - not just myself.
Why are you so excited for?
If conscience is clear, then why be excited?
(In Albany: vozbuzhdatstso.
In french: s'excitér)
And here, comrade, a Russian forum, and goes hunting for wolves being hunted.
but they need a formal justification to ban me.
So I introduced him ...
so far, do not hope to meet, for me freedom of speech is more important ...
Added after 17 minutes
I am very happy (but) that you are familiar with this book, you somehow imenuete "sarabyanovskoy" (he's author of the preface, no more).
For your information.
That book I bought in the shop Tretyakov Gallery DIRECTLY ON OUTPUT NL (worth a fortune, I will not check, but the type 9 rubles 78 kopecks).
Horror, I used the Albany and Old Church Slavonic in one message.
All: forgive, I'm banned, because he fell victim of hate.

I remember.
But not until 1954, and until 1950.
Reading Maria Feodorovna Petrov-Vodkin (Myria Josephine Jovanovic nee <!--~ a ~-->):
Maria Feodorovna suggested Tretyakov Bathing of the Red Horse , but the museum refused. The painting was sold in 1053 in Leningrad collector KK Bacevich, and she had in 1961, has donated her GTG together with other works from his large collection.

Added after 6 minutes
Well, that's megalomania. :shy:
Bonapartism seen normally only in one case - when it comes directly from Napoleon Bonaparte, in other cases, this is a subject for psychiatrists. (c) :D