| Buscador |
04.11.2009 13:02 |
Цитата:
Сообщение от Konstantin
(Сообщение 677604)
But the realists, especially in gipperrealistov has one strong drawback - they are all the same. Gipprerealista How to distinguish one from another? The complexity of large - but whether it is necessary?
|
If you are talking about the imitators, it does. And if the artists, then each should have its own theme. The development of his subject and gives the option of having your face (unless you possess a special technique). In any case, not to speak in general terms, it is better to see the concrete work. At realists, impressionists ... - To find their motive, their colors (now this one does not bother himself). Generally, alternative or you wannabe, or create something of their own, in my opinion, rather artificial. I think it came up artists do not adequately owning their profession. Renoir - one of the most talented impressionists of his time, dabbled in different techniques, different styles ... He could admire the works of fellow guild is not arguing style, but only to obtain the final result. This master commended the work, rather than the process of its creation ...
And what do you think is similar to Serov, Levitan Stozharau on Zverkov, and Ossowski on Grits or Tkachev ...
Perhaps someone and interested in philosophy and the mental state of the author. And from these components, they assess the work. But .... Although, I'm sorry, I got carried away and think this is not about ...
|