LCR, this is understandable, but this character, I'm afraid the "capitalization", as expressed by the distinguished Shima, is positively affected. : shy:
But now it is clear where the love of the current mayor of Moscow to the cap. : D
In the mayor's office to offer this portrait? : eek:

Cyril, and yet I was "plagued me vague doubts" that such a responsible employee and in such attire - suit, a handkerchief around his neck, dressed in overalls sex did not match the status of the owner of the clinics. Maybe I am wrong.

Serge, but as yet had to get dressed then chairman of the executive committee of the Moscow City Council? Look at all the then leaders.
High-jacket. Tie and suit top three only Lenin and carried.

Kirill, I meant portrait Kardovsky, that is what he wears. Is this leader, who you have to scan in, posing her in a dress. Still, this is one of the leaders of culture, art, in one word - a creative person.

It is impossible not to note the similarities between the character in the portrait and the candidate proposed by Cyril. Regarding dress, it is able to dress up on the occasion of writing with his portrait, so to say become a creative person, the official may wish to behold itself is creative.

Serge, may well have to dress well. Nothing artistic, bohemian in these clothes do not see the typical red director, a la Gubenko from the "Director" ...

Kirill, I certainly do not insist on its version, but agree that among the deputies of the Moscow City Council have been and figures of science, culture, arts?

You know, I thought as you, but the arguments Chirila too convincing. This may well be some director of the company, most likely from the experts, from the "former" - a person well-groomed and pretty arrogant ...

In 1927?
Perhaps, but, for example, culture why portray on the balcony of the Moscow City Council?
Him, if he's an actor, for example, and in another entourage can be represented in more typical for him.

And who commanded the Moscow City Council in 1927? This is the first place.
And secondly, all I knew of such a view from the window to immediately understand the "significance" of a man in this particular study?