![]() |
Puni, Jawlensky, Polyakov
3 Attachment(s)
Unknown Australian Auction WA Art Auctions: Claremont, Australia, Auction Date: April 9, 2012.
Lot 79: IVAN POUGNY [PUNI] Russian /French 1894-1956 "The IVAN POUGNY [PUNI] Russian /French 1894-1956 "The Orange Vase" Oil on paper, 60 x 48cms Signed lower left Estimated Price: AUD5, 000 - AUD7, 000 Lot 62: ALEXEI JAWLENSKY [Russian] 1864-1941 Untitled ALEXEI JAWLENSKY [Russian] 1864-1941 Untitled Portriat Oil on paper supported on card, 63x44cms. Signed lower centre Private Collection WA Estimated Price: AUD15, 000 - AUD20, 000 Lot 66: SERGE POLIAKOFF [Russian] [attr.] Untitled Oil on SERGE POLIAKOFF [Russian][attr.] Untitled Oil on canvas Signed lower left 21x24cms Estimated Price: AUD1, 500 - AUD2, 500 |
4 Attachment(s)
Dear forum members, I would like to introduce you to discuss the following story.
In one of the Odessa collection for many years kept the work of P. Nilus (unsigned). The work is never reproduced anywhere else and not exposed. Until the mid - 1980s the picture was in a family gathering one of the daughters K.K.Kostandi. At the end of 2000 - ies in humans, enter into the family, was a photograph of this painting. Some time later, in Odessa, I saw a copy of the original, written on the picture, also without a signature, only much bigger. Original - 48 cm on the larger side. I take a picture of that copy was not possible. After that, I opened a forum on the topic, which showed the true picture, in which participants can discuss who it depicts. I showed pictures of three close friends - Nilus, and Lepeticha Bukovetskogo. They came to the conclusion that the picture is Lepetich, Bukovetsky sits, Nilus wrote. All participants of the discussion topic and is well remembered are still on the board. After the opening theme, in my private messages, one participant wrote that he saw this painting at auction Corners in Kiev that it wanted to give up for auction, but there were a few controversial issues and it has not passed. To which I replied that it is not a picture of my theme, and a fake. If this, my dear here many people will want to confirm this, I'll be happy. Maybe someone from the Four Corners did a photo of that "failed" and will show it here. I also told this story a few other users three years ago. After that I asked to delete a theme, because it was a lot of personal information, which, unfortunately, already use it. And recently, again pops up a copy of this picture Nilus, only this time with a signature at the bottom right corner and not in Odessa, as four years ago, and in Russia. And with an interesting experimental conclusion in which the work is dated 1930-ies, and has a new name "in the living room." Photos of expertise you can see below, and you can read it in detail. I note for you, my friends, only a few fragments.
Читать дальше...
|
Quote:
Otherwise would be claims for pigments. A remarkable investigation, Vivian, bravo! |
This is how Irina so wrong ...
<! - ~ 4 ~ -> |
Quote:
Vivian, thank you, and everything is clear. The difference in skill incomparable. Impudent forgery, and very dead, artificial. |
Quote:
|
And what about the paint could petrify an elementary, if a fake "bungled" in the 2000s?
Is this not paying attention? |
Quote:
My signature allows you to find the answer. |
Quote:
The problem is not . The problem is that experts are losing a sense of artistic vision and aesthetic. The blinding effect of money ... |
I, Comrade.
Vivian looked at the left picture and think: Nilus, Nilus as it is! Well, today went poddelschiki not tell the difference! Well, and then looked the picture on the right - and all became clear ... |
All times are GMT +3. The time now is 00:22. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.