Go Back   Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство > Blogs > Olga777
 English | Русский Forum ARTinvestment.RU RSS Register Blogs FAQ Community Today's Posts Search

Rate this Entry

On the creative responsibility

Posted 28-02-2010 at 14:45 by Olga777
Updated 30-01-2013 at 09:11 by Olga777

Man is born in the image and likeness of God.
It is an axiom for the believers and the sentence for those who do iniquity.
Reason given freedom of expression, and I want to talk about the responsibility of the creative mind of humankind.
Get a distorted view that the essence of creativity - in the discovery and creation of new quality has any value. What kind and what quality?
Create a work that will lift or something that will cause fear and loathing. Unfortunately we forgot about the original meaning of everything. For what it was created?
The meaning of civilization is enclosed in a single phrase: "Be perfect as your heavenly Father."
In art and religion, in principle, a single purpose - to elevate.
"For a long time I'll be the kind people
What I'm feeling good lyre awakening ... "
Pushkin
So new in art I make, only if it is a new spiritual revelation, you closer to God's nature. Everything else - politics and commerce.
Through the word, sound, image creative person has the opportunity to influence the human mind. Unfortunately, only a genius given understanding of their responsibility before God and man for what he is doing, because the "genius and evil - are incompatible."
Responsibility to myself, understanding who you are and why - these are the questions that need to disturb the creative person. Pursuit of pleasure, the unwillingness to think and do what is right - this is the corrosion that eats away at a society from within. Overgorged consumer society, happily going to the slaughterhouse. And this is the whole person? Pathetic, woeful.
I do not condemn those who make their fine craft. But in the first place, do not call it art, and secondly - do not say this as an etalon. No need to implanting young souls on the needle of his perversion, for it is said: "Who seduce even one of these little ones, it is better not to be born."
Views 4334 Comments 11
« Prev     Main     Next »
Total Comments 11

Comments

  1. Old Comment
    Man is born in the image and likeness of God.

    Eto esli vy veruiuschii.

    In art and religion in principle, one purpose - to elevate.

    Vopros spornyi, vozvyshat 'chto? Zachem i nad chem?

    S drugoi storony, i to i drugoe - serioznyi biznes.
    Posted 28-02-2010 at 15:59 by AlexanderG AlexanderG is offline
  2. Old Comment
    Peter's Avatar
    In human nature whether we like it or not incorporated dualizm.S one hand we have the flesh and live in a material world, on the other hand, all our thoughts determine actions, depending on the degree of spiritual razvitiya.Chem higher spiritual development of man, the less he finds in prioretet acquisition of material blag.Neobhodimost awareness of the finiteness of material existence and spiritual beskonenosti-that's what we are told the wise men, lamas, saints and prophets of practically all nations of a mankind our world, unfortunately, has become too great is the power and self-sufficiency deneg.Ponyatie otsutstvuyut.Zhadnost nepreodalima . This is true for artists, and businessmen odinakovo.Prodavatsya, marketed and sold, is the slogan hudozhnika.Dlya horoshi.A this all means that you put in a picture of what distinguishes you from malaria (with all due respect to the profession)? Each artist must paint the picture as a gift to God! Then perhaps he will create something delnoe.Togda and gallery owners will not cover up talking about the spiritual emptiness and sell air and corrupt innocent dushi.Togda and he feels himself not only a machine for the production of money, and a minister in the temple of art.
    Posted 28-02-2010 at 18:15 by Peter Peter is offline
  3. Old Comment
    Olga777's Avatar
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AlexanderG View Post
    Man is born in the image and likeness of God.

    Eto esli vy veruiuschii.

    In art and religion in principle, one purpose - to elevate.

    Vopros spornyi, vozvyshat 'chto? Zachem i nad chem?

    S drugoi storony, i to i drugoe - serioznyi biznes.
    All the joy of this statement is that even an atheist, who believes that he is descended from monkeys, also created in the image and likeness of God. Just when people still believed in it, he has more opportunities to grow spiritually. Thoughts are material. And you can only elevate the spirit above the madding crowd, passions, vices. I think this is obvious.
    Posted 01-03-2010 at 09:36 by Olga777 Olga777 is offline
  4. Old Comment
    Olga777's Avatar
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    In the nature of man we want it or not incorporated dualizm.S one hand we have the flesh and live in a material world, on the other hand, all our thoughts determine actions, depending on the degree of spiritual razvitiya.Chem higher spiritual development of man the less he finds prioretet in acquiring material blag.Neobhodimost awareness of the finiteness of material existence and spiritual beskonenosti-that's what we are told the wise men, lamas, saints and prophets of practically all nations of a mankind our world, unfortunately, has become too great is the power deneg.Ponyatie sufficiency and self-otsutstvuyut.Zhadnost nepreodalima.Eto characteristic of artists and businessmen odinakovo.Prodavatsya, marketed and sold, is the slogan hudozhnika.Dlya horoshi.A this all means that you put in a picture of what distinguishes you from malaria (with all due respect to the profession)? Each artist must paint the picture as a gift to God! Then perhaps he will create something delnoe.Togda and gallery owners will not cover up talking about the spiritual emptiness and sell air and corrupt innocent dushi.Togda and he feels himself not only a machine for the production of money, and a minister in the temple of art.
    The world lies in wickedness. If at least one thoughtful, it will be fun.
    Bach, before starting work, he wrote on the note sheet: "Lord, bless!" And in the end: "Lord, I thank you."
    Posted 01-03-2010 at 09:41 by Olga777 Olga777 is offline
  5. Old Comment
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Olga777 View Post
    All the joy of this statement is that even an atheist, who believes that he is descended from monkeys, also created in the image and likeness of God.

    Uveren, chto naoborot. Boga ne videl nikto, i poetomu ego obrazy sozdavali po chelovecheskim.

     Just when people still believed in it, he has more opportunities to grow spiritually. Thoughts are material.

    To est 'vy doveriaete svoiu zizn' komu-to drugomu? Vy pytaetes 'uiti ot otvetstvennosti za svoi dela, zizn', mysli?

     And you can only elevate the spirit above the madding crowd, passions, vices. I think this is obvious.

    I think it is obvious - eto kliuchevaia fraza. Nichto ne ochevidno iv etom vy ne uvereny

    PS Eto ia dlia podderzaniia razgovora, pereubedit 'vas ni v chiom ne hochu. Vasha zizn '- vam zit'.
    Posted 01-03-2010 at 10:29 by AlexanderG AlexanderG is offline
  6. Old Comment
    Olga777's Avatar
    I am very pleased to studying the Holy Scriptures of the Jews, Muslims, Buddhists. I have not met any doubts about the origin of God's people. Not possible to assume that they were wrong. I feel more comfortable with the faithful Noah, what with not a believer of Epicurus. And I have no doubt in the relationship spiritual and creative human development.
    Posted 01-03-2010 at 10:34 by Olga777 Olga777 is offline
  7. Old Comment
    Olga777's Avatar
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AlexanderG View Post
    I think it is obvious - eto kliuchevaia fraza. Nichto ne ochevidno iv etom vy ne uvereny

    PS Eto ia dlia podderzaniia razgovora, pereubedit 'vas ni v chiom ne hochu. Vasha zizn '- vam zit'.
    You are right, to each his own
    Posted 01-03-2010 at 10:37 by Olga777 Olga777 is offline
  8. Old Comment
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Olga777 View Post
    You're right, each with his
    A ia storonnik filosofii Ayn Rand.
    Posted 01-03-2010 at 11:04 by AlexanderG AlexanderG is offline
  9. Old Comment
    Olga777's Avatar
    I see contradictions. It seems to me I'm a pretty objective.
    Posted 01-03-2010 at 12:23 by Olga777 Olga777 is offline
  10. Old Comment
    Peter's Avatar
    As the discussion takes a theological tone to say: the argument that the astronauts flew into space and did not see there God, therefore God does not stand any criticism. Seeing God's ordinary vision could only nelzya.Eto apostoly.Tem at least in human history there are examples where individuals belonging to different religious denominations in the sensory level could see God domestic zreniem. is happening in a particular state, Christianity is grace and Bozhie.Dokozatelstvom revelation of God's presence just serves to create a convincing artistic image, in literature, painting, sculpture, ritual worship in virtually all nations of the earth (depending on religion). And you can not create a convincing image of what never was and there is no ! Do not do it! Why He exists!
    Posted 01-03-2010 at 23:21 by Peter Peter is offline
  11. Old Comment
    Olga777's Avatar
    Okay. We believe in what we see, but it does not mean that what we see does not exist (example: atoms, electrons, neutrons, etc.) If you move on art, work of the mass shine (excuse me, but the example before my eyes ) and no one can say why this happens. They are light so that some can not stand that light. Bach's music in general has been encrypted with prayer, Velasquez - a mystery not comprehensible (I had a chance to see some works in the original (not from the Hermitage)), Chagall's paintings - this is love, but to prove physical terms it is not possible. God manifests itself, you just want to see it.
    Posted 02-03-2010 at 09:00 by Olga777 Olga777 is offline
 




All times are GMT +3. The time now is 08:44.
Telegram - Contact Us - Обработка персональных данных - Archive - Top


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.