Obscenity on the fence
Запись от Кирилл Сызранский размещена 28.08.2009 в 16:12
obscenity on the fence
SERGEI IVANOV
August 28, 2009
August 25 was inaugurated after a year of reconstruction station Kurskaya - the ring of the Moscow Metro. If repairs to its lobby is decorated with two rows of the Soviet national anthem (in its original version), namely "Through storms the sun of freedom shone to us, and Lenin was a great way for us lit up, but now passengers will be welcomed at other lines of the same verse:" We Stalin grew allegiance to the people to work and exploits inspired us. "
Punctuation in the inscriptions there, and I still do not know what he had in mind Mikhalkov. And, alas, the day before did not get to ask him about it: whether he believed that Stalin was just brought up our commitment to the people or, alternatively, that he was our inspiration for this loyalty, just like a little further - inspired to work and on feats? Depending on interpretation, in a place it needs a comma, but it does not exist anywhere else, like as in the famous riddle of "Eats, have mercy." However, it is to me such strange associations into my head. I train about another.
This text was inscribed on the marble lobby initially, when the station opened in 1950, but after the Twentieth Party Congress, in connection with Khrushchev's de-Stalinization, one piece of the Stalinist anthem was replaced by another. In a sense, this change was of a completely magical character. Then, in the 50's, people still remembered what lines to follow on, and the passenger, mechanically scanned the label about Lenin, just as mechanically continued her own head, and thus inevitably remembering and Stalin - the return of the offender mental Leninist norms as it happened even more creative way than if the responsibility for the line in only a soulless marble. However, just as the mention of the name taboo, say, a bear, from the perspective of ancient man, awakened the beast, pulled him out of the wild thickets of our huts, we unfortunately, the same way and the very name of Stalin, Khrushchev Feels like le cadavre be animated, made him terrified to move - our allegiance, or to work, or exploits.
Over the past half-century hymn, first in general lost his words, then found a friend, then a third, and at the close of the lobby "of the Kursk-ring" is hardly a lot of people remember that there is a line inscribed above his head, well, something regular about Lenin. And in this sense, produced by the operation - not just a restoration of what was, in fact tried to convince the public head of the press service of the Moscow subway Paul Suharnikov. This appearance of the text about Stalin on a new, from scratch, that is marble.
But in the end, restore the same old drawings on the estate, which in their original form are not caught for several generations. So, in terms of consistent protection of monuments, restorers were right. But something is wrong. First, why everyone is afraid to take responsibility for this decision? "When asked whose idea it was - to reconstruct the inscription, Paul Suharnikov did not give comments", - informs "the Echo of Moscow". According to the newspaper. Ru »,« The general director "Mosstroymetroproekta" (namely, the organization undertook the reconstruction) Ernest Sementovsky at the opening said that the decision was taken at the city level. But, as head of the commission told the Moscow City Duma on City Planning and New Development Mikhail Moskvin-Tarkhanov, nothing like the city authorities had not been discussed. That is, write the word on the fence - it is please and how to confess, so there are not any. If all matter in the protection of monuments, then why is it cowardice?
However, the main thing is not even in this: originally the station was decorated with a statue and even Stalin. If you really take everything to recover, he would have to return her. "We have studied the issue of another installation of the monument, but decided on the spot where he stood Stalin, leaving a light niche", - said the head of the Moscow Metro Dmitry Gayev. The point, they say, is that the original statues vanished from the store underground. Well this is really quite ludicrous explanation - could make an exact copy, in fact, and a marble slab in the lobby is not the original. Yes, and the inscription "Stalingrad" instead of "Volgograd" in the decoration of the station are also made from scratch, although very sloppy, but then suddenly ... light niche.
The above circumstances are forced to seek another explanation of this step, the Moscow authorities. What did you mean the Soviet drivers, when slapped a portrait of Stalin on the windshield, but still face out? For Nicholas, the saint is none today so not for turning. Ugodnik now - it for yourself, but Stalin was then - outside, for the outrageous. But what was shocking that stagnant? It was not nostalgia for terror or nostalgia for collectivization. It was an instinctive act of provocation against the evasive position of the authorities. The driver seems to have declared a conditional Suslov: no need to pretend that you are all sure that you know the answers to all questions. Yes, and we do know one little question, on which you yulite, ducking and look pitiful - so do we have with Stalin? So I hung it: this I have done well or badly?
Waves of Gorbachev and Yeltsin's de-Stalinization decommunization, alas, receded, but still lost to return, however, is impossible. Authorities still can not clearly explain what they got with Stalin. Then suddenly Putin said Natalya Solzhenitsyn, the dictator was a monster, then just as suddenly reproached Glazunov, why he generalissimo with Trotsky in one sleigh planted. It would seem that it would be much easier to deal with the interpretation of the Ukrainian Holodomor, if at all Russia instruct the monuments to the victims of the great famine - but it is impossible to force yourself, does not allow the insides. Butovskii Komunarsk and executions on the polygons to give a better church than on behalf of the state where to put anything other than a tiny plate. Because then you will have some words to write on the pedestal of the monument, and what to write - we can not solve.
The word "Stalin", the Moscow authorities shouting like a child cries out obscenity: he's aware that he know everything, but at the same time pretend that there is no such word. The astonishing thing: was thirty years - and all the same. Only because of the freedom of speech now rebelliousness is not concerned citizens, and the individual layers of bureaucracy, and under the earth. In this way, a middle manager protesting against the ideological mezheumochnosti. But doing so - mezheumochnymi means. Erected in the old place a statue of Stalin at the Kursk station, it would be a bold, unequivocal ideological act, our answer to Chamberlain, NATO, EU and OSCE. But instead of answering continues - "light niche.
http://www.ej.ru/?a=note&id=9399
SERGEI IVANOV
August 28, 2009
August 25 was inaugurated after a year of reconstruction station Kurskaya - the ring of the Moscow Metro. If repairs to its lobby is decorated with two rows of the Soviet national anthem (in its original version), namely "Through storms the sun of freedom shone to us, and Lenin was a great way for us lit up, but now passengers will be welcomed at other lines of the same verse:" We Stalin grew allegiance to the people to work and exploits inspired us. "
Punctuation in the inscriptions there, and I still do not know what he had in mind Mikhalkov. And, alas, the day before did not get to ask him about it: whether he believed that Stalin was just brought up our commitment to the people or, alternatively, that he was our inspiration for this loyalty, just like a little further - inspired to work and on feats? Depending on interpretation, in a place it needs a comma, but it does not exist anywhere else, like as in the famous riddle of "Eats, have mercy." However, it is to me such strange associations into my head. I train about another.
This text was inscribed on the marble lobby initially, when the station opened in 1950, but after the Twentieth Party Congress, in connection with Khrushchev's de-Stalinization, one piece of the Stalinist anthem was replaced by another. In a sense, this change was of a completely magical character. Then, in the 50's, people still remembered what lines to follow on, and the passenger, mechanically scanned the label about Lenin, just as mechanically continued her own head, and thus inevitably remembering and Stalin - the return of the offender mental Leninist norms as it happened even more creative way than if the responsibility for the line in only a soulless marble. However, just as the mention of the name taboo, say, a bear, from the perspective of ancient man, awakened the beast, pulled him out of the wild thickets of our huts, we unfortunately, the same way and the very name of Stalin, Khrushchev Feels like le cadavre be animated, made him terrified to move - our allegiance, or to work, or exploits.
Over the past half-century hymn, first in general lost his words, then found a friend, then a third, and at the close of the lobby "of the Kursk-ring" is hardly a lot of people remember that there is a line inscribed above his head, well, something regular about Lenin. And in this sense, produced by the operation - not just a restoration of what was, in fact tried to convince the public head of the press service of the Moscow subway Paul Suharnikov. This appearance of the text about Stalin on a new, from scratch, that is marble.
But in the end, restore the same old drawings on the estate, which in their original form are not caught for several generations. So, in terms of consistent protection of monuments, restorers were right. But something is wrong. First, why everyone is afraid to take responsibility for this decision? "When asked whose idea it was - to reconstruct the inscription, Paul Suharnikov did not give comments", - informs "the Echo of Moscow". According to the newspaper. Ru »,« The general director "Mosstroymetroproekta" (namely, the organization undertook the reconstruction) Ernest Sementovsky at the opening said that the decision was taken at the city level. But, as head of the commission told the Moscow City Duma on City Planning and New Development Mikhail Moskvin-Tarkhanov, nothing like the city authorities had not been discussed. That is, write the word on the fence - it is please and how to confess, so there are not any. If all matter in the protection of monuments, then why is it cowardice?
However, the main thing is not even in this: originally the station was decorated with a statue and even Stalin. If you really take everything to recover, he would have to return her. "We have studied the issue of another installation of the monument, but decided on the spot where he stood Stalin, leaving a light niche", - said the head of the Moscow Metro Dmitry Gayev. The point, they say, is that the original statues vanished from the store underground. Well this is really quite ludicrous explanation - could make an exact copy, in fact, and a marble slab in the lobby is not the original. Yes, and the inscription "Stalingrad" instead of "Volgograd" in the decoration of the station are also made from scratch, although very sloppy, but then suddenly ... light niche.
The above circumstances are forced to seek another explanation of this step, the Moscow authorities. What did you mean the Soviet drivers, when slapped a portrait of Stalin on the windshield, but still face out? For Nicholas, the saint is none today so not for turning. Ugodnik now - it for yourself, but Stalin was then - outside, for the outrageous. But what was shocking that stagnant? It was not nostalgia for terror or nostalgia for collectivization. It was an instinctive act of provocation against the evasive position of the authorities. The driver seems to have declared a conditional Suslov: no need to pretend that you are all sure that you know the answers to all questions. Yes, and we do know one little question, on which you yulite, ducking and look pitiful - so do we have with Stalin? So I hung it: this I have done well or badly?
Waves of Gorbachev and Yeltsin's de-Stalinization decommunization, alas, receded, but still lost to return, however, is impossible. Authorities still can not clearly explain what they got with Stalin. Then suddenly Putin said Natalya Solzhenitsyn, the dictator was a monster, then just as suddenly reproached Glazunov, why he generalissimo with Trotsky in one sleigh planted. It would seem that it would be much easier to deal with the interpretation of the Ukrainian Holodomor, if at all Russia instruct the monuments to the victims of the great famine - but it is impossible to force yourself, does not allow the insides. Butovskii Komunarsk and executions on the polygons to give a better church than on behalf of the state where to put anything other than a tiny plate. Because then you will have some words to write on the pedestal of the monument, and what to write - we can not solve.
The word "Stalin", the Moscow authorities shouting like a child cries out obscenity: he's aware that he know everything, but at the same time pretend that there is no such word. The astonishing thing: was thirty years - and all the same. Only because of the freedom of speech now rebelliousness is not concerned citizens, and the individual layers of bureaucracy, and under the earth. In this way, a middle manager protesting against the ideological mezheumochnosti. But doing so - mezheumochnymi means. Erected in the old place a statue of Stalin at the Kursk station, it would be a bold, unequivocal ideological act, our answer to Chamberlain, NATO, EU and OSCE. But instead of answering continues - "light niche.
http://www.ej.ru/?a=note&id=9399
Всего комментариев 7
