Вернуться   Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство > Дневники > Про искусство

Оценить эту запись

Three of the St. Petersburg collection, or a portrait of the Devil

Запись от Про искусство размещена 13.05.2019 в 13:53

src=

(Pictures of the picture Kustodiev young Sarra Lebedeva)

To 10-го June in the Russian Museum exhibition of three private collections of St. Petersburg @- Palevyh, Berezovsky and Naumovykh. Themselves muzycy say much at the level of Russian, and hell-чего neither here nor in the Tretyakov gallery. To pass is impossible.

Much I knew, because no decent album without reproductions private pictures will not do. Especially about the Silver age of Russian art.

the Ministry of culture retards in any country. When they dokumekaesh that it was necessary to take the most delicious have already been snapped up. The exhibition welcomes a portrait of Sherling brush of my beloved Boris Grigoriev. However, Sherling from Annenkov all-таки cooler. Despite a quintessential German (Einstein and ing. Garin!) model @- Russian" светописец" (photographer).

To me were two pictures. First of all @- ,the big picture Kalmakova:

src=

it is Strange that about Nikolai Kalmakov, the most scandalous Russian artist, no film, no TV series." Дурновкусие"," вульгарщина"," пошлость" @- as it was called. And I understand why:

src=

"Лейтмотивом his works were often the eroticism is absolutely monstrous размеров..." (Mgerb)

Born in Italy, never studied, wrote no sketch @- copy. Most of the heritage is lost, and alcaino surfaced at the Paris flea market in 1962-м; represented in the exhibition, she and 62-м made scandal.

And the beginning was that he undertook to issue a performance for Komissarzhevskoy" Саломея". The play was banned, Komissarzhevskaya was ruined. Said that there is a giant female genitalia @- we did not! Purishkevich announced that if he held on, his faction will buy up the first series and will break.

the artist was young, charismatic, and once confessed to who-то whisper that in the upper room he poses a Devil. Maybe he did a few portraits of the Devil, and what-то even have time to fix:

src=

Taksham we have your Geiger, and even steeper.

src=

Scale @- the only advantage to the Empire. Is it would have taken to write the Devil, say, Finn?

of Course, the work Kalmakova never approached the Soviet museums and a thousand kilometers, so big picture, hitherto unknown @- event.

Second blow exhibition @- a huge, glowing picture of Anisfeld:

src=

I Recommend to take a chair and paiticipate happiness.

After the sudden death Sapunova Anisfeld became a colourist number 1. Unexpected, juicy and prudent combination has long attracted me, but I did not know that there is a Big picture. It is so luminous that she needs a separate room @- will kill any Matissov. I do not remember what-то like.

Unusually bright and small still life with fish.

At the exhibition of Vladimir Lebedev, a lot, as it Leningrad. Sorry, can"t give you two portrait oil from the field" получше gallery" @- glass gleamed terribly. The point is, he used watercolors, pastel. Looking at these, do not understand how to move a brush that would so so gently to write.

Lot Somov. Its from-под nose of the state, the traders took a long time, and not going to give:

src=

Among his tiny aquarelles (I keep this size draw) @- malenkie masterpiece:

src=

Again, glass does not give that feeling of freshness that is achieved by tap colors on the left. And this - well, just" прощание with cornet Оболенским...":

src=

there were a Lot of Boris Grigoriev. Perhaps, in the range 1910-1920 is a leading Russian artist. Comparing it with" новым realism" and young Germans will notice that his technique and virtuosity much superior. The Imperial school does not spend on drink...

src=

Rare horror portretik:

src=

Grown" из Grigorieva" Annenkov remembered a portrait of Hg wells:

src=

... which depicted it in the time of the visit to Russia ("Россия in the mist").

The saddest of" Прогулок king" Benoit...

src=

.... the most crooked city in the world Dobuzhinsky:

src=

" Концерт" Paul Chelishchev (that he was in Russia, had to pay almost 2 million):

src=

andré Famous as... one of the founders of surrealism. Imagine not one of Kandinsky"s... And those paintings, which he wrote in America, living with what-то millionaire"s cheaper to not buy. Me personally not really," Оерелье of roses" next more impressed:

src=

I would say that" проходных" paintings in the exhibition at all. Hanging here is what-то Vedernikov, say @- but in fact it is the leading painter of pretty peteburgskaya Markatov (i.e. followers of albert Marquet). Or, for example, dry" Люовный drink" mihály Zichy. The thing is that this" Напиток" must be in the Russian Museum, because it is court painter and one of the most skilful znamenitymi" порнографов" 19-го century at all." Напиток" @- transition picture to the famous part of the master that children Hess. Say,

src=

That is, the picture is sacred.

-нибудь describe other mysteries of this exhibition...

src=



Link to original
Размещено в Без категории
Просмотров 205 Комментарии 0
Всего комментариев 0

Комментарии

 




Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 12:30.
Telegram - Обратная связь - Обработка персональных данных - Архив - Вверх


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot