The cultural heritage of the country includes all traces of human activity in the physical environment. They are an irreplaceable source of information about the life and activities of people and the historical development of crafts, technology and art. Due to the fact that the monuments, excavations, and cultural environments are non-renewable resources, their ownership must be based on the long term. Cultural monuments and attractions serve as sources of emotional and aesthetic experiences for many people, and modern society can benefit by protecting and actively using their cultural heritage.
So ... GO!
So ... GO!
OSCE has played with a history of Chernobyl
Posted 01-09-2009 at 10:11 by Тютчев
The OSCE is playing with a history of Chernobyl
OSCE found XXI century in the 30-ies of XX century
Vilnius OSCE adopted a resolution entitled "The reunification of divided Europe." She:
proclaims that Stalinism=fascism;
recommends that henceforth observe 23 August as a day of remembrance of victims of Stalinism = fascism;
thus places the responsibility for World War II in Germany - USSR
requires getting rid of demonstrations for the glory of the totalitarian (Stalinist, Soviet) past. If you say simple and austere, all this in perspective means to forget and deny May 9, 1945.
Formally, the resolution of the OSCE is only recommendatory in nature and contains nothing but appeals. But the problem is not the point. Very often talk about the letter and spirit of the documents. Many still remember about the mentioned very often a few decades ago, the "spirit of Helsinki". So, the whole spirit of the resolution of the OSCE intended to establish an equal sign between the Nazi and Soviet society, the reduction of the condemnation of Stalinism to a specific event - the signing of the pact "Ribbentrop-Molotov, shifting the perception of emphasis on the role of the Soviet Union during World War II with the victory May 9, 1945 at agreement with Nazi Germany in 1939. The aim is simple - the rewriting of history, the formation of the USSR an enemy comparable to Nazi Germany. And then transfer the "shadow" of this perception of modern Russia.
Nazi Germany explained the need for an attack on the Soviet Union almost like the OSCE - all the same Stalinism and communism, the need to combat the civilized nations against the domination of the 'Jewish commissars in the Soviet Union. It must be remembered!
German historian D. Eichholz: "the ideology of Nazism belonged to a descendant of the Baltic A. Rosenberg, who served from July 1941 the post of Reich Minister for Occupied Eastern regions. Since the early 20-ies Rosenberg composed inflammatory libel against Soviet Russia. In the fight against "Jewish Bolshevism," he wrote in 1922, is "only one choice - to be destroyed or defeated" [1].
Paragraph of the resolution of the OSCE begins: "Recognizing the uniqueness of the Holocaust, recalling the State party on its impact and the ongoing acts of anti-Semitism throughout the OSCE region, which contains 56 countries, and strongly encouraging the vigorous implementation of the resolutions on anti-Semitism adopted unanimously by the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly since with its annual meeting in Berlin in 2002 "[2].
Surprisingly, the OSCE has something that could not Nazi Germany. For the Nazis, Russian Bolshevism and Jews - this is a "cocktail", which must be destroyed, including physically. Now the OSCE has divided this "cocktail". From "Jewish Bolshevism" of the Nazis singled out the Holocaust and remained in "draft" Stalinism. This, apparently, "social nanotechnology» XXI century. For the OSCE, the Holocaust, the extermination of the Jews - a unique phenomenon. But Bolshevism and the destruction of Russian and Soviet people - this is the struggle against Stalinism, which has no relation to the problems of protection of human rights and humanism has not.
In early May 1941, before the publication of those directives, the Army forces in Germany in one of his draft similar regulations to justify the need of non-compliance with any rules and regulations have been waging war on the territory of the USSR that the troops are supposed to be resist "particularly dangerous and destroying all order an item from the civilian population, which is the bearer of the Jewish-Bolshevik world" [3].
Words ... words ... words ... But not just words ...
OSCE adopted a resolution with a very good title: "The reunification of divided Europe: the promotion of human rights and civil liberties in the OSCE region in the XXI century". Here are just a little, most point of the resolution is not devoted to the problems of the new century, it would be logical, and not even the Nazis, had already been convicted several times, and not only in the resolutions, including the real history and our victory. And they are devoted mainly to the past of Russia - its Soviet history and the condemnation of this story.
From the XXI century in the resolution of the OSCE remains the only "pure" point, the last. OSCE "Requests to pay more attention in all States parties to respect human rights and civil liberties even in times of terrorist threats, economic crisis, environmental disasters and mass migration" [4].
Interestingly, this paragraph describes the present time, almost as a social catastrophe. But can not find the place and opportunity to devote its resolution analysis of the problems of our time. All the fervor of human rights and civil liberties are called in the past, during the Second World War and condemnation of the social structure of the State liberator. This task is important in protecting human rights in the new century.
OSCE is not interested in social randomized regions, which appeared recently in Europe. For example, Kosovo. Human rights and civil liberties of the Serbs in Kosovo not stirred sponsors. Their concern is not the problem of real people and real suffering, and the problem of "truth" in history.
OSCE and the truth of history
It is interesting that the socio-political organization reserves the right to (albeit gently, with all those with reservations) to establish the truth in history, ie problem, not in relation to the resolutions, and even more so to the resolutions of the political.
OSCE "recalls that knowledge of history helps to avoid the recurrence of similar crimes in the future and that a frank and thorough discussion of history will contribute to reconciliation based on truth and honor the memory of the dead" [5].
Let me ask the question: what is truth? And while here the OSCE?
But the resolution has already been an assessment of past changes is past and these estimates are given for the ultimate truth, known by the OSCE: «two powerful totalitarian regime, the Nazi and Stalin, who carried with them the genocide, violations of human rights and freedoms, war crimes and crimes against humanity "," transition from communist dictatorship to democracy can not be achieved overnight "," to declare August 23, ie date of signing the pact 70 years ago, "Ribbentrop-Molotov", European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism » (emphasis added - AA). It would be logical then to propose to declare a Europe-wide day of remembrance on Sept. 30, when in 1938, Chamberlain, Daladier, Mussolini and Hitler signed the Munich Agreement, Hitler openly pushing for a major war and to the east.
But it's not logic and conscience moved sponsored the resolution. The PACE resolution combines the condemnation of Stalinism with a specific historical date Covenant "Ribbentrop-Molotov" by creating a new false stereotype of combining concrete historical events with a negative assessment of the USSR, by equating it to Nazi Germany and the subsequent imposition of liability equal to the USSR with Germany for the outbreak of World War II.
Of course, this is only one step. Of course, a new stereotype is formed at once. But this is not the first step in this direction in Europe and the OSCE is recommended to make a whole range of such steps.
When Britain and Europe are colluding with Nazi Germany - a good conspiracy. And if it is Russia, Soviet Union - is that bad?
And what about the collusion of the "civilized" states with Stalin after the war? When, in exchange for the annexation of eastern Europe into a zone of influence of the USSR, the regime was established in western Europe, which is not realized given the free will of the peoples in France, Italy and Greece, where a full range of violent impact on society of these countries have not come to power, communist Party? How do I rate this a conspiracy? There are conspiracies and bad is good conspiracies?
The pan-European Day of Remembrance for logically and morally it would be done June 22, the day of the attack on the Soviet Union, whose citizens have brought the greatest sacrifices in the struggle against Nazism and won it, or on November 7, the day of the parade in 1941 on Red Square, which became a symbol of spiritual victory in the war against Nazism.
But apparently, the problem of truth in history and science, as well as the problem of conscience shall be decided by vote of the OSCE.
In Stalinism and the OSCE has much in common in their approach to matters of history. For example, the practice of turning scientific problems in the political resolution, a substitute for science. The new resolution reiterated the OSCE "feat" of Stalin, who wrote "A Brief History of the CPSU (b). How the OSCE nor wrote about the promotion of human rights and civil liberties in the XXI century - but always somehow get a short course on the history of the CPSU (b) - Stalinism.
Where do the ghosts of history
Created in Europe, the mythology of Stalinism and its image was dispersed, not in words ... It was dispersed operation - the raising of the Red Banner of Soviet troops at the Reichstag in May 1945!
How to create historical myths, stereotypes of perception, by whom and for what? Remember how everyone reads the beginning of the Manifesto of the Communist Party and from which emerged the stereotype, saying: Marx said that the specter of communism was haunting Europe.
Let's see what Marx and Engels wrote the famous manifesto in fact:
«A specter is haunting Europe - the specter of communism. All the forces of old Europe to the persecution of the holy ghost: Pope and Czar, Metternich and Guizot, French Radicals and German police.
Where is the opposition party that its opponents in power has not been decried as Communistic? Where is the opposition party, which, in turn, not hurled back the branding reproach of Communism, the more advanced opposition parties, so against its reactionary adversaries?
Two things result from this fact.
Communism is already acknowledged by all European force.
It's time for Communists to the whole world openly express their views, their aims, their tendencies, and tales of specter of Communism with a Manifesto of the party itself "[6] .
Thus, Marx and Engels argued the opposite. Do not they have created a "specter of communism" and they talked about it. All the powers of old Europe have created the specter of communism and frightened them all, including ourselves.
Written in pen, perhaps, indeed, impossible to cut down the ax, but very often today that it is written clearly and simply become invisible to the average person. Ability to read and understand words and text are now rare and almost unique ability.
Place bogey of communism in Europe beginning of XIX century in the beginning of the XXI century is Russia and its recent history. Remember this comes not out of love for truth, but only grew constancy dislike the OSCE to Russia. However, this dislike has arisen not today and not yesterday, but much more long time.
While calling for tolerance, the OSCE "calls upon States parties to pursue a policy of combating xenophobia and aggressive nationalism, and to take more effective measures to combat these phenomena." This is a very interesting call. Especially if we recall that the socialist parties in Europe before World War I on the general congresses of the International sang and wrote about the resolution internationalism. But immediately forgot about the internationalism of the war, standing with the "aggressive nationalism". Tens of millions of victims on the conscience of the socialist parties, who are now active participants in the political life of Europe and OSCE.
Very often these parties to forget their promises and the words and act directly opposite to that promise. Those condemned by most of today, the Bolsheviks, which led to Stalinism, were among the few who remained faithful to his political principles. We can be supporters of the other principles. But the Bolsheviks can not be accused of lying, in contrast to today's heirs II International, many of which are collected under the name of the OSCE.
Was Stalinism ideology like fascism? Nes whether he ideas of national racism?
Stalinism - a false notion. Stalinism is not comparable with fascism, but with "napoleonizmom" or "kromvelionizmom. Stalinism - is not the ideology of racial, national, or even social superiority. Stalinism - a statement of the role of personality in the post-revolutionary form of government of the USSR, and Nazism - the ideology of racial and national genocide. And this is a fundamental difference. If Stalin was an advocate of world revolution, he would make use of the second world war for a decisive step in this direction. But he did just the opposite - to dissolve the world revolutionary organization - the Third International.
Stalinism - is not so much a child of ideology as a child of the revolution. And the same child, as the results of all the revolutions of earlier ages.
Soon the feast of the French Revolution. But Jacobinism and mass terror of the French Revolution terrible Stalinism. This event, incidentally, could also be an occasion for the resolution of the OSCE, if they are so fond of the story ...
Condemns "civilized" humanity collectivization? Ok! Apparently, humanity can not do otherwise. And what about the first experience of "collectivization", which, however, came not from the goals of industrialization and the ideas of world revolution, but of the greed of personal gain - fencing of land in England? Let us put this together. And then it becomes clear that the collectivization of Stalinism still a pale shadow of anti-humanism "enclosures" in the "civilized" England.
Stalinism can be condemned as a violent practice of implementation of social ideas and the implementation of qualitative social change. But this is possible only in one case. If the same manner be condemned practices such as social revolutions of the transition to industrial society - English, French and others. And not just in the past ... We can recall in this series all the "velvet" revolution, "the war for freedom" in Afghanistan, Iraq, and not only them ...
In Russia, unlike Europe preserved the traditional forms of transmission of historical memory, which are not limited to advertisements in the media. We are still alive Soviet generation, who remember their grandparents telling about the war and "Stalinism", about how it was.
We still remember his past. Remember who we are. We have others. And we are not animals. We - REMEMBER!
There are concepts that are irrelevant to the truth do not. If the ghosts of history to create, then it's somebody looking for? Totalitarianism - international terrorism - Stalinism - Democracy - Globalization.
A little truth about the words
What is this phenomenon - totalitarianism?
Totalitarianism characterizes the form of political organization of society and at the same time its form of social organization. This feature provides a variety of industrial societies, as a rule, at the stage of their formation, but also extends to their development stage. While totalitarian societies in reality did not exist and not exist. This word born in the international political confrontation of the Cold War and, by and large, meaningless. His main point - the psychological attachment called these words the assessment relationship to society as a "bad".
OSCE has, "aware that the transition from Communist dictatorship to democracy can not be achieved overnight and that it should also take into account historical experience and cultural heritage of the countries" [7].
The resolution, which appeals to the truth, as something very easy to make synonyms more controversial ideas: Stalinism - totalitarianism - a communist dictatorship. And as the truth has already given an assessment of all societies of the socialist camp in the 70-80-ies as a "Communist dictatorship". Although these societies may have been much further from the spiritual and political dictatorships than modern Europe. Dictatorships also have different social forms and can be even legal state and even by popular vote.
The same is meaningless in this resolution and the notion of democracy. They differ only estimate "bad - good". Although the question of what is good and what is bad - this is not an issue on which the OSCE could, or ever will be able to answer.
And, perhaps, the OSCE will say where and what the terrible and horrible Osama Bin Laden? As a long time ago it does not, and no one even remembers that he was and is. But it should according to the scenario to continue to spin a web of its terrorism and it must occur here and there ... He has to much more interested in the OSCE than the issue of past history. We are talking about human rights today. But the ghost appeared when needed and just melted in the air like a mirage when the need for it disappeared. Now the place occupied by Osama swine flu crisis and other fears, created in recent years .... "New threats, as they are called resolution of the OSCE ...
What is good and what is bad?
How manifest and manifest humanistic values "civilized" Europe and the Stalinist Soviet Union in everyday life? It's one thing to accept the resolution in the OSCE, and quite another to share a sandwich neighbor when you're eating little and too hungry. Not from an excess of something to give, not to throw out, as is now accepted in Europe and is named in the "high-calm" charity. A break bread, when he and his very small. How then?
How to behave normal representatives of European civilization in the German concentration camps, and how to behave "slaves" of the Soviet Union?
Asked a stranger arbitrator. And even biased against Russia-USSR arbitrator - a Pole, who went through all the circles of hell the German concentration camps, along with representatives of all the peoples of both European and Russia's civilization.
This meeting took place with the Pole in 1991 during the Pope's arrival in Poland.
And at the political level, and often at personal, Poles are not always say the least, demonstrate a positive attitude towards Russia and Russian. In one village near Warsaw, we met a farmer who, upon learning that we were from Russia, treated us as a native people. Why?
Everything was very simple. During the Second World War, this Pole was in a German concentration camp in which there were representatives of almost all European nations. It was in a concentration camp has changed his attitude to Russia and Russian. It was found that the level of supply of various German prisoners were placed in direct dependence on their nationality. And least of all in the camp received food is Russian prisoners of war. Representatives of the "civilized" countries - the French, British, Americans and others - got more and parcels in a concentration camp.
But, said the Pole, none of them have never even shared a slice of bread. They have their backs turned away even from his friends and ate these premises alone.
The only prisoners who shared their food, including the Poles, were Russian prisoners of war. They died, but shared.
Therefore, for the Poles, who visited the German concentration camps, Soviet, Russian man was not a symbol of totalitarianism, Stalinism and communism, as a symbol of a different attitude to life, others, truly human relations among people, a symbol of genuine people, a symbol of human dignity.
And the OSCE offers a "design and develop training manuals, programs and activities, especially for younger generations, of a totalitarian history, human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms, pluralism, democracy and tolerance" [8], and to condemn those who struck at the Pole war and forced to completely change their outlook on life.
Why the OSCE has its declaration? Definitely not from a desire to understand the past, certainly not for the love of truth in history. In general, it is not a matter of political parliamentary organizations.
The problem is not historical, but political. The problem is not just political, but also a worldview. The problem is not just a political and ideological, but also of values, civilization.
This is not a matter of argument. It is a matter of meanings and values. This is the question of why a person lives.
Two way - two worlds - two world - two sets of values
Talk and write about this can be a lot, but enough to look at two iconic image of our (Europe and Russia) attitude towards life, to a fundamental difference of our values was discernible!
Let's just look at the two spiritual image of Europe and Russia civilizations, which, in artistic form fix completely different attitude to the purpose and meaning of life and spirit in general.
Is a statue "The Thinker" by Rodin and O. painting "Christ in the Desert II Kramskoi. Both are at a crossroads, both are on the verge of cognition, on the verge of choices.
"The Thinker" - a compressed spring to action. Low forehead, the tension of thought, expressed in the attitude and hamper the efforts of the muscles show only one thing - the desire to erect a momentary action. It is a symbol of the European attitude to life, the meaning and the soul ... It is important not the spirit, and compressed muscle power ... The "Thinker" is not a long thought. Already in the 30 years he straightened to his full height and will be a statue of the Aryan in Germany ...
Quite a different image appears in the picture I. Kramskoy. In this work, there is no action, but it visibly shows the life of the spirit, the work of thought. And even turns out that the action of the spirit is more important than the effect of the body.
"Under the influence of a number of impressions, - said afterwards I. Kramskoy - I have settled very heavy sense of life. I see clearly that there is one moment in the life of every human being, more or less created in the image and likeness of God, when it is thought - whether to go left or right, take it for the Lord God did not give a ruble or a step to evil? "
"And I realized - he wrote I. Kramskoy - that this - this kind of character who, having power to crush all gifted with the talent to conquer a whole world decided not to do that, which involve animals of his inclinations." Main idea I. Kramskoy those years, much exercised it - is the tragedy of the lives of those high-natured people, who voluntarily renounced all personal happiness, and best, the most supreme and pure way that the artist could find to express their ideas, was Jesus Christ .
We are often asked (there are some fans ask - publicists with sly eyes): if you are smart and spiritual, then why are so poor? And laugh ... Why? When we look at the picture Kramskogo "Christ in the Desert", then remember, why ... "I do not live by bread alone" ...
Russia is thinking: who is she and why ... She is one now in the wilderness of history. Europe has already decided everything and for myself and for others ... Mount muscle awaits commands to the action!
However, in the history of wins not the one who eats a parcel in a concentration camp, turning his back to someone, but someone who break bread!
Therefore, the question of the Declaration of the OSCE - is not a question of how it was "really". They are so good and knows it. This is a question that they have made a step on the road leading down ...
The OSCE is trying to turn the liberation from fascism, which brought Russia into Europe, in the crucifixion of Russia ... but we do not need to justify the OSCE ...
It is WE redeem his path and Judah is the policy of Europe with their blood and the raising of Our Banner in Berlin in 1945!
Alex Ananchenko
http://www.sorokinfond.ru/index.php?id=813
Links:
[1]http://scepsis.ru/library/id_704.html
[2]http://wek.com.ua/article/6493/
[3]http://scepsis.ru/library/id_704.html
[4]http://wek.com.ua/article/6493/
[5]http://wek.com.ua/article/6493/
[6] Marx. K., F. Engels, Manifesto of the Communist Party. M., S. 1.
[7]http://wek.com.ua/article/6493
[8]http://wek.com.ua/article/6493
Total Comments 4
Comments
-
I think that the author of the diary will allow me to add a little about Poland and the Second World War.
the RAF has accused Poland of trying to dismember the Soviet Union
The authorities of Poland before the Second World War, had planned to dismember the Soviet Union. According to RIA Novosti, such information is contained in declassified archives of the Foreign Intelligence Service of Russia.
According to the compiler of a collection of documents "Secrets of Polish politics. 1935-1945" by Leo Sotskova, found documents in the archives of the Polish General Staff, which refers to the establishment in Ukraine, Central Asia and Caucasus special forces working with ethnic minorities. Work was supposed to be aimed at stirring up separatist sentiment and destabilize the situation in the republics.
Sotskov added that these actions are coordinated organization of Prometheus, whose headquarters is located in Paris.
The collection of documents is confined to the 70 th anniversary of the Second World War. Lev Sotskov argues that the current leadership of Poland may not have published data, since the war years all Polish archives were taken by German Nazis. Russia also has those documents, because in that period, the Soviet intelligence was well-developed intelligence service in Warsaw.
The list of declassified documents include telegrams embassies, military attache reports, memos and transcripts of interviews, as well as papers relating to the Polish-British relations and a report on negotiations with the leadership of Hermann Goering in Poland. The volume of documents is almost 400 pages.
Reporter also said that part of the responsibility for instigating the Second World War is to Poland, as its leadership in 1939, rejected the possibility of creating an anti-Hitler front.Posted 01-09-2009 at 17:15 by SergeiSK 
-
"When we look at the picture Kramskogo" Christ in the Desert "- a beautiful picture ...
Posted 01-09-2009 at 18:43 by Евгений
-
Quote:Originally Posted by SergeiSK
I think that the author of the diary will allow me to add a little about Poland and the Second World War.
the RAF has accused Poland of trying to dismember the Soviet Union
Collection of Documents "Secrets of Polish politics. 1935-1945 »
http://vid-1.rian.ru/ig/poland-2009.pdfPosted 02-09-2009 at 10:47 by Ухтомский
-
In Moldova, the memorial will open by the Romanian soldiers who fought on the side of Nazi Germany
Saturday October 24 Canh commune Cantemir district in Moldova will be the opening of the memorial by the Romanian soldiers who died on these lands during the attack on the USSR in July 1941. According to the National Bureau of cult heroes of Romania, the event will be held in celebration of National Army of Romania, a REGNUM correspondent reports News.
At the opening ceremony of the memorial will be attended by representatives of the Presidential Administration of Romania, the Romanian Government, civil society and the Romanian Orthodox Church. On Sunday, October 25 representatives of the Romanian delegation will lay flowers at a similar military cemetery in the village of Gypsy in the same area, open in summer 2006 with the assistance of the Communist government of Moldova.
As noted in the office, during the major battles for a base near the village of Gypsy in the period 2-26 July 1941 4 th and 5 th Romanian army had suffered major losses of human life. At the military cemetery in the village buried by 1020 Gypsy of Romanian soldiers in the new memorial village Kanya - 916. According to the National Bureau of worship heroes of Romania, during the wars that took place during the period 1877 - 1945 gg., Killing 900 thousand Romanian soldiers, 132 thousand were buried outside Romania.
REGNUM information News: 1941-1944. Romanian army participated in the Second World War on the side of Nazi Germany and is the largest allied contingent among the satellite countries of Germany (267,727 people). In the occupied territories of Romania, Moldova, Transnistria and Ukraine in the period from 1941 to 1944. Romanian fascists were killed on different data from 380,000 to 600,000 Jews. Precise data on the overall losses of the USSR as a result of the Romanian occupation is still there. The Red Army in August 1944 caused a revolution in Romania (King Mihai I overthrew the fascist dictator Ion Antonescu), and siding with the anti-Hitler coalition, August 25, 1944.
http://www.regnum.ru/news/1218071.htmlPosted 25-10-2009 at 01:32 by Тютчев
