:):(:confused::mad::p ;):D:o:rolleyes::cool:
Argument against Rothko
Posted 28-07-2009 at 23:56 by Черномашенцев Владимир
Somehow I have not stick in your head, which for 50 years before Rothko someone has already done so on. Create interesting, did the first time. And even the woman was capable of this. I apologize for famous quotations, as well as easier to show on the known samples. Here are my arguments:
1) Matyushin, movement in space, 1920, fragment
2) Rozanov, Pointless Arrangement, 1916
3) Larionov, Camp, 1910, fragment
4) Boltovich, Fresh Wind, 1916
5) Ender, experience new spatial arrangements, 1920
Sorry for the quality of copies - forced to crawl from the album in the absence of the originals in my collection. We can say that it's not quite like. But I even reproductions seem more significant than the original Rothko, which only the size and superior designs early 20 th century. Rozanova - quite similar. Matyushin, like Malevich in the Red cavalry, was able to show the minimum means this momentum! And from Boltovich well and breathe fresh air, the wind changes!
Where the dynamics and the mood of the Rothko? Even the little-known Rozanova and Boltovich interesting. And they were the first.
I have several paintings in the collection of a People's Artist of Russia, which is very good wizard in the style of impressionism. That's when he was late for a hundred years. Or half-century art - this is a moment?
1) Matyushin, movement in space, 1920, fragment
2) Rozanov, Pointless Arrangement, 1916
3) Larionov, Camp, 1910, fragment
4) Boltovich, Fresh Wind, 1916
5) Ender, experience new spatial arrangements, 1920
Sorry for the quality of copies - forced to crawl from the album in the absence of the originals in my collection. We can say that it's not quite like. But I even reproductions seem more significant than the original Rothko, which only the size and superior designs early 20 th century. Rozanova - quite similar. Matyushin, like Malevich in the Red cavalry, was able to show the minimum means this momentum! And from Boltovich well and breathe fresh air, the wind changes!
Where the dynamics and the mood of the Rothko? Even the little-known Rozanova and Boltovich interesting. And they were the first.
I have several paintings in the collection of a People's Artist of Russia, which is very good wizard in the style of impressionism. That's when he was late for a hundred years. Or half-century art - this is a moment?
Total Comments 6
Comments
-
"I have several paintings in the collection of a People's Artist of Russia, which is very good wizard in the style of Impressionism"
It is interesting to see ..Posted 29-07-2009 at 05:27 by Евгений 
-
How to reach the hands - and show. But he is not the most interesting to me an artist. I bought it because at the end of his career he was finally enough to draw a masterful impressionist style, as they say people who know his earlier work. But late for a hundred years. And the price is low for the national. But on verified information, he received the title for her friendship with the chairman and sitting in the presidium. You do this?
Posted 29-07-2009 at 18:13 by Черномашенцев Владимир
-
If the secret, do not.
L. Komar member of the union of artists or amateur?Posted 29-07-2009 at 20:03 by Евгений
-
A Eugene
1) I have somewhere wrote about LA Komar, that is professional. Has higher artist. education, union member. I found it by accident last year at one union official exhibition.
2) You asked a question about a People's Artist of Russia in the style imperrionizma, which I bought the slack. This is not Ionov! Ionov - honored. This can show a good example of the difference in titles and talent. A popular name - Elchaninov. You did it know?Posted 30-07-2009 at 12:05 by Черномашенцев Владимир
-
Clearly, to understand ..
Posted 30-07-2009 at 12:25 by Евгений
-
Frankly, I put the level of popular Elchaninova an order of magnitude below the level of Distinguished Ionova. Since my wife is from Smolensk, I am perfectly familiar with all local artists. Their more than 150, of which 10%- quite on the level. And they know me - I'm the customer buys. Because I know how Elchaninov received titles. Was there before someone Namerovsky chairman, who finished the job, too popular and almost an academician. If you look at his work - frankly weak. So a broker friend. Previously, he drew large Elchaninov compilations cloth, unable to cope with the composition. Under the old age and became a master of bad draws from nature in the style of impressionism, if possible. But in general it is a good artist, for his work is not ashamed. It is clear to me he is not so close spiritually
And L. Komar I put above Elchaninova. I buy Ionova, Komar, Elchaninova and others for fun, not thinking about the potential increase in prices. After all, millions of artists and all mnyat The Napoleon. I just spend my money on hobbies. Someone buys a new Mercedes, and I - new paintings. Sometimes, over time, are very successful.Posted 30-07-2009 at 13:38 by Черномашенцев Владимир
