:):(:confused::mad::p ;):D:o:rolleyes::cool:
My arguments against Amer. "Arts» II
Posted 29-07-2009 at 22:16 by Черномашенцев Владимир
I picked up a particularly distinctive (but not quite pornographic, in the literal sense of the word), copies of contemporary Amer. art. On many I mentioned earlier - the way want to look. Note that these works were printed in the albums with promising titles like "Masterpieces of 20 th century, or are well-respected museum MoMA (The Museum of Modern Art, New-York).
I am Russian and I love Russian painting. However, as French, Italian Spanish, Dutch, German, Polish, Armenian, Georgian .... but not like the culture Amer.
[B]
WARNING for connoisseurs of fine nerve Amer. Art:
I do not recommend reading my comments, because they may contain bad words. I ask in this case limited only viewing the pictures, and then my argument "against" easily turn into an argument in favor for a specific person.
Restriction of age - no.[/B]
[SPOILER]
11) Warhol, Gold Marilyn Monroe, 1962
Well, well. I often see in articles of furniture and interiors of the reproductions of the Golden Klimt (great designer), but do not see the gilded Warhol. He is not popular among the people. And people sometimes feel that good.
12) Stella, Marriage of reason and squalor II, 1959
Very complex and interesting meaning of the name.
13) Reinhardt, Abstract Painting, 1963
No comments.
14) Newman, Vir Heroicus Sublimis, 1950-1951, XM 242H541
I specifically pointed out the dimensions to all connoisseurs, it was clear what Newman has surpassed Rothko.
15) Meireles, Zero dollars, 1978-1984, 7h16sm
Something similar is sold in stalls, only much cheaper. Long painted - probably all the watermarks and paper reproduced the villi.
16) Klein, Blue Monochrome, 1961
I can not repeat my "favorite" "Blue Monochrome". And a couple of very interesting work.
17) Noerman, three colors at sunrise, 1968
It is "significantly" if the judge by name. I, too, so I can not think about five minutes.
18) Matyushin, movement in space, 1920, fragment
This I have set for contrast.
[B]PS I can still nafotografirovat such a masterpiece. My art album 300-400 kg.[/B]
[/SPOILER]
I am Russian and I love Russian painting. However, as French, Italian Spanish, Dutch, German, Polish, Armenian, Georgian .... but not like the culture Amer.
[B]
WARNING for connoisseurs of fine nerve Amer. Art:
I do not recommend reading my comments, because they may contain bad words. I ask in this case limited only viewing the pictures, and then my argument "against" easily turn into an argument in favor for a specific person.
Restriction of age - no.[/B]
[SPOILER]
11) Warhol, Gold Marilyn Monroe, 1962
Well, well. I often see in articles of furniture and interiors of the reproductions of the Golden Klimt (great designer), but do not see the gilded Warhol. He is not popular among the people. And people sometimes feel that good.
12) Stella, Marriage of reason and squalor II, 1959
Very complex and interesting meaning of the name.
13) Reinhardt, Abstract Painting, 1963
No comments.
14) Newman, Vir Heroicus Sublimis, 1950-1951, XM 242H541
I specifically pointed out the dimensions to all connoisseurs, it was clear what Newman has surpassed Rothko.
15) Meireles, Zero dollars, 1978-1984, 7h16sm
Something similar is sold in stalls, only much cheaper. Long painted - probably all the watermarks and paper reproduced the villi.
16) Klein, Blue Monochrome, 1961
I can not repeat my "favorite" "Blue Monochrome". And a couple of very interesting work.
17) Noerman, three colors at sunrise, 1968
It is "significantly" if the judge by name. I, too, so I can not think about five minutes.
18) Matyushin, movement in space, 1920, fragment
This I have set for contrast.
[B]PS I can still nafotografirovat such a masterpiece. My art album 300-400 kg.[/B]
[/SPOILER]
Total Comments 2
Comments
-
And I "0Dollarov" rchen like-for-my very clever! (ttolko not realized that behind the building on the lower bill (in medalene)?Posted 07-08-2009 at 12:16 by NATA NOVA 
-
It is interesting that after almost 8 months and nearly 300 video tape, no one caught me on a simple provocation. Thousands more watched the same information in a profile on pro Amer. painting.
Look closely now number 7: Noerman "three colors at sunrise, 1968.
Surname nothing like? 1968 - the year of my birth. But she "painting" made with "Photoshop" from a few blurry photos of wallpaper in my house. NOBODY protested for forgery. However, it looks bad compared to other works. Perhaps I should start calling yourself an artist?
And so we call the American painting?!Posted 24-04-2010 at 20:41 by Черномашенцев Владимир
