On the background of Putin removed the family
Posted 07-05-2011 at 14:33 by Кирилл Сызранский
Dmitry Bykov
On the background of Putin removed the family
Meetings with the masters of the power of culture is better to defer until 1861
I do not think it makes sense to go back to a specific meeting between Premier Penza with culture or the president of the journalists "Rain". Interesting to think about why the format of the meeting of intellectuals with the regime in general, it seems, has run its course. Because if the notorious visit to the infamous Tea Party caught me in the notorious Moscow, I would be oh how difficult a decision. And most likely, I would offer is still forced to politely decline - because the project "A Poet and Citizen" as something very much needed in time of power. Its only just started to look, listen to him, though a small quantity, but an interesting and promising segment of the population - and here is quite deliberate attempt to cause hostility to the project is at an audience that is particularly skeptical about full-time chit-chatting with the authorities. This network audience has just condemned the leadership of "Rain" for subservience to Medvedev and the rejection of our project - and here we are before the premiere of clear eyes, what! Whoever planned this layout, it is such harassment, that thanks for the kind invitation somehow completely uncomfortable. It is clear also that our beautiful eyes to anyone in the Kremlin nor the White House particularly did not like. Otherwise we would have been a penny price as a satirist - with which I, for all self-criticism, I can not agree.
For anyone who knows the national history, clearer clear: the authorities met with intellectuals, not in order to satisfy its needs and to solve their own problems. Furthermore - the fact of holding these meetings indicates the presence of such problems as, say, in December 1962 and March 1963, when the country first time in 40 years began mass protests against the authorities. Now the country is clearly not very good, though, in my opinion, exaggerated fears of the authorities: no one is going to blame them, they are just gone, and nothing but shame, this situation they are not threatened. Trying to tame intellectuals, promising her money for author cinema or on the development of the theater looks like a belated desire poupravlyat "flow of thoughts and only because - the country", but if in the previous ten years, this intelligentsia, openly ignoring, blaming, in addition to a lack of patriotism and ambassadorial shakalstve - hope to achieve something today, quite illusory. Moreover, today we have a problem with the political thinkers, if not understood by them, the ruler of Duma Vladimir Surkov, Yu (who, incidentally, and really holds sway over a number of fragile nashistskih brains, inspiring young people unreasonable hope that if you are very unwell lead, we can eventually become as demon-stylish as he is, this primitive Satanism is attractive to a small detachment of stupid and active mladorastinyakov but Vladislav Surkov has concealed from them the main thing - should begin after all of Menatep, and for were good just a start nineties). Political thinkers can be almost without exaggeration be called Pelevin, who prudently to minimize their contacts with the outside world has been for 20 years, or Boris Akunin, is the literary mask, but no FS Bondarchuk, no O. Tabakov this role qualify for a long time can not, and do not want to, I think. What to AG Gordon, he very clearly demonstrates that is already open VY Surkov fact that the demonic and servility in the domestic version is not only not mutually exclusive, but even, in the words of the poet, do not walk one without the other. This demonic servility is proud contempt for all who are weaker and less, and the adoration of force, in whatever form it miserable donned.
Whether to participate in projects of power? Sometimes you need to, sometimes not - it depends on the phase of the historical cycle, as well as walking in shorts cause different effects depending on the season. Summer walk in wearing shorts is good and right, and in winter the same - it is dangerous and funny. When the power is in the phase formation and gropes for the development of the country, especially if your beliefs coincide with its goals - to cooperate with the government is reasonable and honorable, especially in countries where there is relentless war of extermination between the people and elites. But in Russia, and even in the late phase of authoritarianism, most reminiscent of the years 1848-1855, it is the eve of the next smallest failure of war - such cooperation does not give power and greatly compromise the intelligentsia. That is why I believe that creative meeting should be postponed until at least 1861, when he would not come.
here.
On the background of Putin removed the family
Meetings with the masters of the power of culture is better to defer until 1861
I do not think it makes sense to go back to a specific meeting between Premier Penza with culture or the president of the journalists "Rain". Interesting to think about why the format of the meeting of intellectuals with the regime in general, it seems, has run its course. Because if the notorious visit to the infamous Tea Party caught me in the notorious Moscow, I would be oh how difficult a decision. And most likely, I would offer is still forced to politely decline - because the project "A Poet and Citizen" as something very much needed in time of power. Its only just started to look, listen to him, though a small quantity, but an interesting and promising segment of the population - and here is quite deliberate attempt to cause hostility to the project is at an audience that is particularly skeptical about full-time chit-chatting with the authorities. This network audience has just condemned the leadership of "Rain" for subservience to Medvedev and the rejection of our project - and here we are before the premiere of clear eyes, what! Whoever planned this layout, it is such harassment, that thanks for the kind invitation somehow completely uncomfortable. It is clear also that our beautiful eyes to anyone in the Kremlin nor the White House particularly did not like. Otherwise we would have been a penny price as a satirist - with which I, for all self-criticism, I can not agree.
For anyone who knows the national history, clearer clear: the authorities met with intellectuals, not in order to satisfy its needs and to solve their own problems. Furthermore - the fact of holding these meetings indicates the presence of such problems as, say, in December 1962 and March 1963, when the country first time in 40 years began mass protests against the authorities. Now the country is clearly not very good, though, in my opinion, exaggerated fears of the authorities: no one is going to blame them, they are just gone, and nothing but shame, this situation they are not threatened. Trying to tame intellectuals, promising her money for author cinema or on the development of the theater looks like a belated desire poupravlyat "flow of thoughts and only because - the country", but if in the previous ten years, this intelligentsia, openly ignoring, blaming, in addition to a lack of patriotism and ambassadorial shakalstve - hope to achieve something today, quite illusory. Moreover, today we have a problem with the political thinkers, if not understood by them, the ruler of Duma Vladimir Surkov, Yu (who, incidentally, and really holds sway over a number of fragile nashistskih brains, inspiring young people unreasonable hope that if you are very unwell lead, we can eventually become as demon-stylish as he is, this primitive Satanism is attractive to a small detachment of stupid and active mladorastinyakov but Vladislav Surkov has concealed from them the main thing - should begin after all of Menatep, and for were good just a start nineties). Political thinkers can be almost without exaggeration be called Pelevin, who prudently to minimize their contacts with the outside world has been for 20 years, or Boris Akunin, is the literary mask, but no FS Bondarchuk, no O. Tabakov this role qualify for a long time can not, and do not want to, I think. What to AG Gordon, he very clearly demonstrates that is already open VY Surkov fact that the demonic and servility in the domestic version is not only not mutually exclusive, but even, in the words of the poet, do not walk one without the other. This demonic servility is proud contempt for all who are weaker and less, and the adoration of force, in whatever form it miserable donned.
Whether to participate in projects of power? Sometimes you need to, sometimes not - it depends on the phase of the historical cycle, as well as walking in shorts cause different effects depending on the season. Summer walk in wearing shorts is good and right, and in winter the same - it is dangerous and funny. When the power is in the phase formation and gropes for the development of the country, especially if your beliefs coincide with its goals - to cooperate with the government is reasonable and honorable, especially in countries where there is relentless war of extermination between the people and elites. But in Russia, and even in the late phase of authoritarianism, most reminiscent of the years 1848-1855, it is the eve of the next smallest failure of war - such cooperation does not give power and greatly compromise the intelligentsia. That is why I believe that creative meeting should be postponed until at least 1861, when he would not come.
here.
Total Comments 0
