Speech by Leonid Parfenov Prize. Vladimir Listyev
Posted 25-11-2010 at 22:20 by Кирилл Сызранский
Today journalist Leonid Parfenov was awarded first prize of a television Vladislav Listyev. The award is given for a vivid embodiment of the on-screen creative principles of the famous journalist.
After receiving the statuette winner, Parfenov, thanked his colleagues and his wife, praised the role of Vladislav Listyev in the development of Russian television, and then read his speech.
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Leonid Parfenov:
This morning I was in hospital with Oleg Kashin. He did another surgery, surgically restored in the literal and figurative sense of the term the face of Russian journalism. The brutal beating of a correspondent of the newspaper "Kommersant" has caused a much more wide public and professional environment than any other attempt on the life and health of Russian journalists. In the reaction of the federal TV channels, however, could be suspected task - after all, the tone of the immediate response of the head of state said the incident differed from the first person after the murder of Anna Politkovskaya. And yet.
Prior to the attack on him by Oleg Kashin for federal ether did not exist and could not exist. He recently wrote about the radical opposition, protest movements and street youth leaders, and these themes and characters are unthinkable on TV. Marginal like medium begin to change something in a public situation, creates a new trend, but among TV journalists in Kashin's simply no peers. Andrew was one Loshak, and he went all - on the Internet.
After the real and imaginary sins, 90 in 2000-ies in two stages - first for the elimination of media oligarchs and then the sake of unity in a series of counter-terrorism war - there was the nationalization of "federal" teledata. Journalistic theme, and with them the whole of life, we finally have shared in the passable and impassable on TV on TV. For all sorts of politically significant ether guessed goals and objectives of government, its mood, attitude, her friends and foes. Institutionally, this is not information at all, and masterful PR or antipiar - What is ethereal artillery preparation withdrawal Luzhkov. And, of course, samopiar power.
TV reporter for federal policy makers - not newsmakers, and the heads of his superiors. Institutionally, the correspondent if and not a journalist at all, but an official, following the logic of service and subordination. With Head Chief impossible, for example, an interview in his true sense - an attempt to discover who would not want disclosed. Talking Andrei Kolesnikov Vladimir Putin in a yellow Lada-Kalina "allows you to feel self-confidence premiere, the mood in 2012 and the ignorance of unpleasant topics. But imagine if in the mouth of the national TV reporter, and then in the national televised question posed by Kolesnikov, Putin: Why did you cornered Mikhail Khodorkovsky?
This is again an example of "Kommersant" - sometimes it seems that the leading social and political newspaper of the country (The Herald is not software-opposition) and the federal TV channels talk about different Russia. A leading business newspaper "Vedomosti" Gryzlov, the speaker actually equated to a terrorist supporters - including his habit to the context of the Russian media, television, first and foremost. Rating acting president and prime minister are estimated at about 75%. The federal television about them can not hear the critical, skeptical or ironic statements. Hushed up to a quarter of the spectrum of public opinion. Higher power appears dead expensive: only about her well or anything. Though the audience is clearly needed and other views: What caused the furore about the only exception - showing on television dialogue Yuri Shevchuk, Vladimir Putin.
Evergreen techniques familiar to anyone who caught the USSR Central Television. When reporting a substitute Protocol shooting "a meeting in the Kremlin", the text contains "intonation support" when there are canons of the show: the first person takes a minister or head of the region, goes to the people, hold a summit with his foreign colleagues. This is not news, and old age - a repetition, as is customary in such cases to broadcast. There are shows and even without infopovodov - the thinned air garden of any vegetable would look like figure simply by virtue of a regular appearance on the screen.
Having worked only in Ostankino Ostankino or 24 years, I say this with bitterness. I have no right to blame anyone of his colleagues, he is not no fighter, and other exploits not wait. But we must at least call a spade a spade. For telejournalism doubly hurt when the obvious achievements of the large-scale TV shows and the national school of TV series. Our television is more sophisticated excites, captivates, entertains and makes you laugh, but hardly call it civil socio-political institutions. I am convinced this is one of the main reasons for the dramatic decline in TV viewing most active part of the population, when the people of our circle you say: Why include a box, it's not for me to do!
Much worse than what most people no longer need in journalism. When the perplexed: "Well, beat, think of it! you never know who we beat, and then because of the reporter then such fuss? - Millions of people do not realize that a professional journalist is a risk for the sake of their audience. Journalist beaten not for what he wrote, said or removed. And for what it is read, heard or seen.
I saw here.
After receiving the statuette winner, Parfenov, thanked his colleagues and his wife, praised the role of Vladislav Listyev in the development of Russian television, and then read his speech.
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Leonid Parfenov:
This morning I was in hospital with Oleg Kashin. He did another surgery, surgically restored in the literal and figurative sense of the term the face of Russian journalism. The brutal beating of a correspondent of the newspaper "Kommersant" has caused a much more wide public and professional environment than any other attempt on the life and health of Russian journalists. In the reaction of the federal TV channels, however, could be suspected task - after all, the tone of the immediate response of the head of state said the incident differed from the first person after the murder of Anna Politkovskaya. And yet.
Prior to the attack on him by Oleg Kashin for federal ether did not exist and could not exist. He recently wrote about the radical opposition, protest movements and street youth leaders, and these themes and characters are unthinkable on TV. Marginal like medium begin to change something in a public situation, creates a new trend, but among TV journalists in Kashin's simply no peers. Andrew was one Loshak, and he went all - on the Internet.
After the real and imaginary sins, 90 in 2000-ies in two stages - first for the elimination of media oligarchs and then the sake of unity in a series of counter-terrorism war - there was the nationalization of "federal" teledata. Journalistic theme, and with them the whole of life, we finally have shared in the passable and impassable on TV on TV. For all sorts of politically significant ether guessed goals and objectives of government, its mood, attitude, her friends and foes. Institutionally, this is not information at all, and masterful PR or antipiar - What is ethereal artillery preparation withdrawal Luzhkov. And, of course, samopiar power.
TV reporter for federal policy makers - not newsmakers, and the heads of his superiors. Institutionally, the correspondent if and not a journalist at all, but an official, following the logic of service and subordination. With Head Chief impossible, for example, an interview in his true sense - an attempt to discover who would not want disclosed. Talking Andrei Kolesnikov Vladimir Putin in a yellow Lada-Kalina "allows you to feel self-confidence premiere, the mood in 2012 and the ignorance of unpleasant topics. But imagine if in the mouth of the national TV reporter, and then in the national televised question posed by Kolesnikov, Putin: Why did you cornered Mikhail Khodorkovsky?
This is again an example of "Kommersant" - sometimes it seems that the leading social and political newspaper of the country (The Herald is not software-opposition) and the federal TV channels talk about different Russia. A leading business newspaper "Vedomosti" Gryzlov, the speaker actually equated to a terrorist supporters - including his habit to the context of the Russian media, television, first and foremost. Rating acting president and prime minister are estimated at about 75%. The federal television about them can not hear the critical, skeptical or ironic statements. Hushed up to a quarter of the spectrum of public opinion. Higher power appears dead expensive: only about her well or anything. Though the audience is clearly needed and other views: What caused the furore about the only exception - showing on television dialogue Yuri Shevchuk, Vladimir Putin.
Evergreen techniques familiar to anyone who caught the USSR Central Television. When reporting a substitute Protocol shooting "a meeting in the Kremlin", the text contains "intonation support" when there are canons of the show: the first person takes a minister or head of the region, goes to the people, hold a summit with his foreign colleagues. This is not news, and old age - a repetition, as is customary in such cases to broadcast. There are shows and even without infopovodov - the thinned air garden of any vegetable would look like figure simply by virtue of a regular appearance on the screen.
Having worked only in Ostankino Ostankino or 24 years, I say this with bitterness. I have no right to blame anyone of his colleagues, he is not no fighter, and other exploits not wait. But we must at least call a spade a spade. For telejournalism doubly hurt when the obvious achievements of the large-scale TV shows and the national school of TV series. Our television is more sophisticated excites, captivates, entertains and makes you laugh, but hardly call it civil socio-political institutions. I am convinced this is one of the main reasons for the dramatic decline in TV viewing most active part of the population, when the people of our circle you say: Why include a box, it's not for me to do!
Much worse than what most people no longer need in journalism. When the perplexed: "Well, beat, think of it! you never know who we beat, and then because of the reporter then such fuss? - Millions of people do not realize that a professional journalist is a risk for the sake of their audience. Journalist beaten not for what he wrote, said or removed. And for what it is read, heard or seen.
I saw here.
Total Comments 0
