In St. Petersburg, attending the trial of Constantine Dushenov.
Запись от Кирилл Сызранский размещена 07.09.2009 в 07:17
Freedom anti-Semites!
In St. Petersburg, attending the trial of Constantine Dushenov. In the narrow little world of modern Orthodox Russia is a celebrity: he, on behalf of Metropolitan Ioann of St. Petersburg in the 1990's, but after the death on behalf of the Metropolitan's own published all sorts of accusations "Jews" as the enemies of Orthodoxy. Dushenov in favor of the defendant, two priests of the "informal" Orthodox. Now looking for witnesses from the Moscow Patriarchate - priests or professors of religious academies, which would have stated that "real" slander of the Orthodox Jews do not support.
Released, however, the confusion: management of MPs has decided its representatives to the court not to send. For some it's bad news: it turns out, the "European" or "cultural" the Moscow Patriarchate, all these statements before the rabbis "- a sign. And under the guise of old thick layer of anti-Semitism. Of course, there is the Patriarchate is not anti-Semites, but they do not want public scandals with co-religionists.
News bad behavior "empeshnikov" - classic Sov. Treasury liberals carefully hide his liberalism. It calls for cooking, for internal complacency, and not for external use only.
However useful to glance at what is happening at a different angle. Preaching anti-Semitism - the sin and folly (though sin is always stupid, but stupidity is not always sinful, fortunately). The trial is the prosecution of anti-Semitism - and not a sin, and folly, but violation of the fundamental democratic principle - freedom of speech.
So, for example, many Western liberals condemn the laws punishing Holocaust denial. And when the Russian human rights activists and liberals write: "The idea of combating extremism is good, only the performance of idiotic" - a failure to understand the very essence of liberalism and human rights fields. These are the famous: "I am ready to sacrifice their lives so that you may express their beliefs, with which I disagree."
Combating anti-Semitism should not be a policy - that is, public action with the imposition of fines and upryatyvaniem in prison. No need to reload the State that should (and can!) To a person.
The desire to put an anti-Semite, to use the stick state to a good cause is stronger, the less people willing to personally confront anti-Semitism. In the case of Dushenov's obvious that the majority of Orthodox Russia plagued by anti-Semitism to a great extent, much more than people believe. Sometimes the impression is that anti-Semitism in the Orthodox environment as strong as in the medium security officers, although sociological research on this topic has not yet been made. Do Orthodox - it begins to fight this anti-Semitism in their environment, from their pastors and bishops. But no! How can rock the boat, which you'll never get! Suddenly you will drop - and then how to live?
Man pants - and begins to compensate for their cowardice. Against sheep boy, against the young man and himself a sheep. Expose Dushenov is simple enough, you're his father rebuke.
The weakness to the system - a manifestation of another wrinkle deeper: the inability to work with people with like-minded people. "Official liberals" in Russia is always alone. They were never together. Separately on. Georgy Kochetkov (liberal, very partial, but still, not anti-Semite, in any case) and its thousands flock. Separately on. Alexander Borisov and his mnogotysyachniki. Separate secular liberals - and all those hundreds of people are not united, every man for himself. Liberalism is the idea, and completely not the main liberalism, liberalism as a way of life. But above all, liberalism is not the ability to build cooperation with the state, but with such a private person. In the absence of such a liberal, and remains only to call uncle state - even if the uncle is a hundred times more dangerous than hooligans who attacked on you.
What, after all, anti-Semitic film, made worse Dushenov Shevkunova film about the death of the Byzantine Empire from the dark forces - the film actively promoting public television? What is more dangerous: cry "Beat the Jew" or the exquisite "there is a need to take measures to counteract the destructive forces of unknown origin"?
In the above-mentioned priests have an excuse - they may have and would like good, but sacrifices himself for his flock. Perhaps, just to justify their silence those treasury liberals, which the new patriarch brought with him into power as readers: Alpheus, Legoyda, emergencies and many others. None of them did not express a protest against the presence of the same repertoire of deacon one of Moscow's churches, the now and the archdeacon, an anti-Semite is not hidden, but active. But these other excuse - they are in fact "inside transform" the system, educate bosses.
That's who do not have the slightest excuse, - so this is a "normal" of the Moscow Patriarchate, the thousands of young and not-so-young of the congregation, who have higher education, who did not like the anti-Semites, and partly because even the Jews. But these do not protest and do not require anything. However, maybe, and they justify themselves. Like, if a conflict, so do not be driven out of anti-Semites, and me? And where I am, poor thing, I'll go where I find a canonical religion? So the logic of bureaucratic practices leads to behavioral samooskopleniyu.
However, most of these "educated" are not ashamed of what they drank from the source, poisoned anti-Semitism, something babble about the fact that "he still missionary talent, he says brightly." And Goebbels was not a missionary talent?
In America Dushenov certainly not planted would not even begun to be judged. And just in America Dushenov course of the day and would not have been in the press-secretary of the Metropolitan of the Orthodox Church. Yes, and Metropolitan John, if he had lived in the United States, quickly would have no congregation, if expressed in anti-Semitic spirit. Without charge or trial - the environment and the congregation would have done would tell him everything they think, and if he had not responded, it would have taken, do not hesitate and do not ozabochivayas "canonical" (the more so that "respect for the canons - the ideal of a beautiful but utterly unattainable).
Social boycott does not mean that boycotted the phenomenon will disappear. In America, full of stinking, sinuses, including the Orthodox, where the assembled anti-Semites with Christian slogans. But it is the sinuses, in which no one fuss and who, because of the boycott, no public do not matter.
You can refer to the fact that in America, originally a free people, and which operate freely, and in Russia slavery and the need to act secretly. But only history shows that in America, initially no liberalism was not, the Puritans were fanatics cleaner Dushenov (incidentally, in the sense of anti-Semitism). Another thing is that initially there was no hope in the state. In the end, take the example of anti-Semites - they do not rely on the state, united, ready to organize pogroms and without high patrons, and sometimes against their will.
* * *
Meanwhile in Moscow, continuing the attack on various charitable centers. They thrust out of the premises. The crisis - and officials intend to convert into money all square meters, to whom to reach.
Several times people treated me with a request to make public on the radio "Svoboda" ugly facts of oppression with disabilities, children, etc. Each time I agree - and each time perimeter. People call and ask for an apology: the persecuted leaders of foundations and organizations are afraid of "Freedom". "This is politics" - they say. Here's the plot on the channel, the state newspaper, on public radio - is not politics, it is permissible. And all very well know what TV channels, newspapers, public radio, although on paper superchastnye and superchestnye.
So: the fight against anti-Semitism - not politics, not a state matter, and charity - this is politics, it is a state matter.
Every person smoldering resistance force, self-defense. It does not matter, and often not even a sin if a person uses force to prevent in his (her!) Per the same anti-Semitism or any other racist. The trouble, when the state - this gigantic lens - used to increase strength. Forest fire into a wildfire. No, it should be carefully digging a fire - that is to make sure that the struggle for freedom of expression was carried out as words, rather than bureaucrats.
If hands are itching to use the state, then send this lens is on the strength of support. Catholics are called "subsidiarity": when you give a subsidy, the other gave a grant, and funds still not enough, then and only then can and should turn to the third, fourth, to the governor, the president ... For good, not evil! At operation a poor man or poor man's child. At the apartment homeless. On the bread to the hungry. And even in this noble cause needs eyes and the eyes, because the state - such a tremendous strength that can resemble зашибить to death to whom embarked help.
Here is the "eyes and eye and is a policy - in the present, not the Bolshevik sense. After all, the Bolsheviks and their successors "policy" was pejorative word - is when someone dares to speak from the bottom, to protest or request not alone, as a group. That's right: this is politics. But when the Politburo, or the presidential administration, or the mayor or the governor begin to uncontrollably decide the destinies of millions of people - this is not politics, and dictatorship.
People who want to use the state to give shorten the anti-Semites, you can understand. Freedom of speech - a crane in the sky, and anti-Semite he is here, now croak. People who do not want to use the levers of pressure on the state to defend their rights and the rights of the disadvantaged, is understandable. If you humbly ask if "the cloth and do not pretend to shine, there is a chance that the master mercy and fling from his desk the other piece. And maybe this will leave.
Everyone can understand! But you must understand and those who have discovered the freedom of speech, who discovered that the policy is not the worst and the best way to protect the unfortunate. One can understand the short-sighted people, but you need to understand and farsightedness. Today will put an anti-Semite - the day after tomorrow will put Zionist. That seems unlikely, but it is inevitable. Today we conclude a deal with the clerk not to eat our lunch detushek - the day after he eats and detushek, and grandfathers. So the freedom of anti-Semitic fool, rigid state-nomenclature fool!
priest Yakov Krotov.
http://www.grani.ru/Society/Xenophob.../m.156307.html
In St. Petersburg, attending the trial of Constantine Dushenov. In the narrow little world of modern Orthodox Russia is a celebrity: he, on behalf of Metropolitan Ioann of St. Petersburg in the 1990's, but after the death on behalf of the Metropolitan's own published all sorts of accusations "Jews" as the enemies of Orthodoxy. Dushenov in favor of the defendant, two priests of the "informal" Orthodox. Now looking for witnesses from the Moscow Patriarchate - priests or professors of religious academies, which would have stated that "real" slander of the Orthodox Jews do not support.
Released, however, the confusion: management of MPs has decided its representatives to the court not to send. For some it's bad news: it turns out, the "European" or "cultural" the Moscow Patriarchate, all these statements before the rabbis "- a sign. And under the guise of old thick layer of anti-Semitism. Of course, there is the Patriarchate is not anti-Semites, but they do not want public scandals with co-religionists.
News bad behavior "empeshnikov" - classic Sov. Treasury liberals carefully hide his liberalism. It calls for cooking, for internal complacency, and not for external use only.
However useful to glance at what is happening at a different angle. Preaching anti-Semitism - the sin and folly (though sin is always stupid, but stupidity is not always sinful, fortunately). The trial is the prosecution of anti-Semitism - and not a sin, and folly, but violation of the fundamental democratic principle - freedom of speech.
So, for example, many Western liberals condemn the laws punishing Holocaust denial. And when the Russian human rights activists and liberals write: "The idea of combating extremism is good, only the performance of idiotic" - a failure to understand the very essence of liberalism and human rights fields. These are the famous: "I am ready to sacrifice their lives so that you may express their beliefs, with which I disagree."
Combating anti-Semitism should not be a policy - that is, public action with the imposition of fines and upryatyvaniem in prison. No need to reload the State that should (and can!) To a person.
The desire to put an anti-Semite, to use the stick state to a good cause is stronger, the less people willing to personally confront anti-Semitism. In the case of Dushenov's obvious that the majority of Orthodox Russia plagued by anti-Semitism to a great extent, much more than people believe. Sometimes the impression is that anti-Semitism in the Orthodox environment as strong as in the medium security officers, although sociological research on this topic has not yet been made. Do Orthodox - it begins to fight this anti-Semitism in their environment, from their pastors and bishops. But no! How can rock the boat, which you'll never get! Suddenly you will drop - and then how to live?
Man pants - and begins to compensate for their cowardice. Against sheep boy, against the young man and himself a sheep. Expose Dushenov is simple enough, you're his father rebuke.
The weakness to the system - a manifestation of another wrinkle deeper: the inability to work with people with like-minded people. "Official liberals" in Russia is always alone. They were never together. Separately on. Georgy Kochetkov (liberal, very partial, but still, not anti-Semite, in any case) and its thousands flock. Separately on. Alexander Borisov and his mnogotysyachniki. Separate secular liberals - and all those hundreds of people are not united, every man for himself. Liberalism is the idea, and completely not the main liberalism, liberalism as a way of life. But above all, liberalism is not the ability to build cooperation with the state, but with such a private person. In the absence of such a liberal, and remains only to call uncle state - even if the uncle is a hundred times more dangerous than hooligans who attacked on you.
What, after all, anti-Semitic film, made worse Dushenov Shevkunova film about the death of the Byzantine Empire from the dark forces - the film actively promoting public television? What is more dangerous: cry "Beat the Jew" or the exquisite "there is a need to take measures to counteract the destructive forces of unknown origin"?
In the above-mentioned priests have an excuse - they may have and would like good, but sacrifices himself for his flock. Perhaps, just to justify their silence those treasury liberals, which the new patriarch brought with him into power as readers: Alpheus, Legoyda, emergencies and many others. None of them did not express a protest against the presence of the same repertoire of deacon one of Moscow's churches, the now and the archdeacon, an anti-Semite is not hidden, but active. But these other excuse - they are in fact "inside transform" the system, educate bosses.
That's who do not have the slightest excuse, - so this is a "normal" of the Moscow Patriarchate, the thousands of young and not-so-young of the congregation, who have higher education, who did not like the anti-Semites, and partly because even the Jews. But these do not protest and do not require anything. However, maybe, and they justify themselves. Like, if a conflict, so do not be driven out of anti-Semites, and me? And where I am, poor thing, I'll go where I find a canonical religion? So the logic of bureaucratic practices leads to behavioral samooskopleniyu.
However, most of these "educated" are not ashamed of what they drank from the source, poisoned anti-Semitism, something babble about the fact that "he still missionary talent, he says brightly." And Goebbels was not a missionary talent?
In America Dushenov certainly not planted would not even begun to be judged. And just in America Dushenov course of the day and would not have been in the press-secretary of the Metropolitan of the Orthodox Church. Yes, and Metropolitan John, if he had lived in the United States, quickly would have no congregation, if expressed in anti-Semitic spirit. Without charge or trial - the environment and the congregation would have done would tell him everything they think, and if he had not responded, it would have taken, do not hesitate and do not ozabochivayas "canonical" (the more so that "respect for the canons - the ideal of a beautiful but utterly unattainable).
Social boycott does not mean that boycotted the phenomenon will disappear. In America, full of stinking, sinuses, including the Orthodox, where the assembled anti-Semites with Christian slogans. But it is the sinuses, in which no one fuss and who, because of the boycott, no public do not matter.
You can refer to the fact that in America, originally a free people, and which operate freely, and in Russia slavery and the need to act secretly. But only history shows that in America, initially no liberalism was not, the Puritans were fanatics cleaner Dushenov (incidentally, in the sense of anti-Semitism). Another thing is that initially there was no hope in the state. In the end, take the example of anti-Semites - they do not rely on the state, united, ready to organize pogroms and without high patrons, and sometimes against their will.
* * *
Meanwhile in Moscow, continuing the attack on various charitable centers. They thrust out of the premises. The crisis - and officials intend to convert into money all square meters, to whom to reach.
Several times people treated me with a request to make public on the radio "Svoboda" ugly facts of oppression with disabilities, children, etc. Each time I agree - and each time perimeter. People call and ask for an apology: the persecuted leaders of foundations and organizations are afraid of "Freedom". "This is politics" - they say. Here's the plot on the channel, the state newspaper, on public radio - is not politics, it is permissible. And all very well know what TV channels, newspapers, public radio, although on paper superchastnye and superchestnye.
So: the fight against anti-Semitism - not politics, not a state matter, and charity - this is politics, it is a state matter.
Every person smoldering resistance force, self-defense. It does not matter, and often not even a sin if a person uses force to prevent in his (her!) Per the same anti-Semitism or any other racist. The trouble, when the state - this gigantic lens - used to increase strength. Forest fire into a wildfire. No, it should be carefully digging a fire - that is to make sure that the struggle for freedom of expression was carried out as words, rather than bureaucrats.
If hands are itching to use the state, then send this lens is on the strength of support. Catholics are called "subsidiarity": when you give a subsidy, the other gave a grant, and funds still not enough, then and only then can and should turn to the third, fourth, to the governor, the president ... For good, not evil! At operation a poor man or poor man's child. At the apartment homeless. On the bread to the hungry. And even in this noble cause needs eyes and the eyes, because the state - such a tremendous strength that can resemble зашибить to death to whom embarked help.
Here is the "eyes and eye and is a policy - in the present, not the Bolshevik sense. After all, the Bolsheviks and their successors "policy" was pejorative word - is when someone dares to speak from the bottom, to protest or request not alone, as a group. That's right: this is politics. But when the Politburo, or the presidential administration, or the mayor or the governor begin to uncontrollably decide the destinies of millions of people - this is not politics, and dictatorship.
People who want to use the state to give shorten the anti-Semites, you can understand. Freedom of speech - a crane in the sky, and anti-Semite he is here, now croak. People who do not want to use the levers of pressure on the state to defend their rights and the rights of the disadvantaged, is understandable. If you humbly ask if "the cloth and do not pretend to shine, there is a chance that the master mercy and fling from his desk the other piece. And maybe this will leave.
Everyone can understand! But you must understand and those who have discovered the freedom of speech, who discovered that the policy is not the worst and the best way to protect the unfortunate. One can understand the short-sighted people, but you need to understand and farsightedness. Today will put an anti-Semite - the day after tomorrow will put Zionist. That seems unlikely, but it is inevitable. Today we conclude a deal with the clerk not to eat our lunch detushek - the day after he eats and detushek, and grandfathers. So the freedom of anti-Semitic fool, rigid state-nomenclature fool!
priest Yakov Krotov.
http://www.grani.ru/Society/Xenophob.../m.156307.html
Всего комментариев 0
