"Russian march" in the hole of the landscape
Posted 01-11-2011 at 16:11 by Кирилл Сызранский
"Russian march" in the landscape hole
Towards a "Russian march"
Alexander Morozov
November 4 soon. Celebration of "liberation from the occupation regime." Young and not so young people go to any "wetlands" are chanting something, wearing T-shirts "Jaroussky" and think that somehow contribute to the restoration of Russia. They do not realize that the preservation of Russian as a modern nation due to the possibility or impossibility of cultural dominance. One may shake banners, repeating, "Thank you Grandpa for victory" - and thus gradually degrade friendly march to moving out of the world's history.
1
On what rests the "cultural domination"? From an early German romanticism and to this day it stands on three things: language, landscape, institutions. Of course, in some way organized and interpreted.
language. you can not provide cultural domination without creating an aura of absolute importance of one's own language. Language given by God and the people is the voice of being itself. Therefore, the so-called "national elite" attaches great importance to the most "car maintenance language." This machine consists of the cultivation of historical figures, experimented with the language of the mandatory support of ancient forms of the native language of the system integration of other people in your language, etc. Roughly speaking, the "Russian nationalist" - is now the one who knows at least some amount of church-Slavic, as well as experiencing constant interest in our language group. Cult figures for the nationalists are not only the military chiefs, and, in the first place, "the organizers of the tongue", the creators of literature. Modern developed nations create and maintain cultural giant work units engaged in the global promotion of their own language.
In what may look optics, Russian in the post twenty years completely hammered into your language. Soviet machine of the Russian language was. But she broke with the Soviet Union. The state of Russia has done nothing that could be described as efforts to create a "machine language". Unlike the Armenians, and the Estonians have not found the influential elite groups who have realized the importance of language policy.
Landscape. It is easily seen traveling around the world that the attractiveness of a nation and its cultural dominance are associated with particular attitude to the organization of the landscape. The basic notion of Russian life is "a landscape gap." That is, simply put, continuous hole. In these holes the wind chasing plastic bags blown from landfills. Any people can equip a hundred feet around the hearth of his own family. But in order to dominate the cultural need to create a national organization of public car spaces and landscapes. If you do not know how to do, do not understand why this is necessary, then no, Alexander Nevsky, and no banner will not save you from failure in the history of the world. Russian landscape was always so poorly organized that man as a "native" to himself he could only think of something subhuman, a natural (native land - a "get out in the open field, I - your delicate ear"). Social historians will say that the Russian city appeared too late for the most part as a military garrison, and then - as a closed military production. So it is. Russian never liked own cities. And in the post-Soviet twenty years, those who got to lead the life of the people, too little to understand the role of the landscape. They did not realize that the person takes the shape of the landscape. Today, we continue to live like a pile of discarded plastic bags that wind is in the landscape hole. And while this is so, the Estonians and the Chechens as a people are more cultured than us, not to mention the Dutch or Swiss.
institutions. We assume that the theoretical sociology in the last third of the twentieth century responded to the question of why the small group of nations - large and small - to keep the cultural leadership in a globalizing world. This is the result of careful, conservative attitude to the national social, political and cultural institutions. You can not save the cultural dominance, if you do not "impersonal institutions" (Douglas North), which were used by your parents, grandparents and great-grandparents. Such institutions can be both formal and informal. It can be as "institutions" and "norms". But these institutions - as sites of social communication, as the "agora" as instruments of a long history of "exchange" - should be maintained through the generations. It may be universities, parliaments, foundations, fraternities, professional associations, national archives and libraries, etc. Moreover, such institutions are even elements of the historic landscape, everyday traditions, norms of verbal behavior. These institutions are now undergoing a transformation, or even a "crisis" and in those nations that have preserved cultural domination. But there is no sense to equate their "crisis" and our antiinstitutsionalizm. These are different things. We have a still continue to believe the heroes of national history than those who maintained institutions and those who rushil instrumentalizoval or how horrible a day for reasons of political expediency.
2
So who here and now is the "Russian nationalists"?
It's not that kids who loudly shouts to "Russian march". And do not those who are taking care of her top, sitting in the security agencies. What is the meaning of something to shout about Caucasians and about NATO, if you are unable to provide cultural domination and have no idea on what it is based?
This is not due to NATO, we still have no premium for foreign Slavists. And not because of the Caucasus in a large Russian city, where there is a main plant of the first Russian oligarch hundreds of Forbes, for 20 years, were able to equip only 100 meters quay. Note that both the river itself, as we know, this is also a national cultural institution. Not because of Kadyrov in the center of Smolensk in the river for twenty years lying around the farm of an unfinished bridge. And no Azerbaijani diaspora Vologda blame that on the dominant bend someone drove the elite residential complex in appearance resembling a grain elevator.
If your sons will not learn by heart your own "Beowulf", then your daughter will give birth to other nations. There are often different idiots like to repeat the refrain about the fact that "if you do not feed their own army, it will be fed by others." And it would be correct to say otherwise: you do not want to feed their own philologists Russian Language? It's okay to feed them by other States. How, in fact, it happened in two decades.
We've been the last Russian nationalists.
This is a weak path from scattered across a vast plain, philologists, poets, museum professionals, architects, urban planners, young, new urban activists, thinking about how to equip the "public space". Peering in recent years to what is happening here in Russia, I see some places here and there - like mushrooms under the dense foliage withered, - without any "system" scattered remains of the Russian cultural identity. It is not in the faith (Orthodox), not "force of Russian arms," and not in the memory of the "Soviet empire" and the power of the Eastern bloc. She - in new developments for which a meaningful guess the intention associated with the language, landscape and institutions. Therefore, the "Russian nationalists" here today - is, for example, the fund Yeltsin, who set up, finally, the prize for writers living outside the Russian Federation and writing in Russian. This site personnel and Openspace Polit.ru, which, as the weak force, talking about the Russian philology. This is an electronic archive of the creators runivers, who are concerned that the national archives are not digitized and are not published. These young cultural planners in Karelia, Krasnoyarsk, Perm, Samara, Yekaterinburg, which in the past few years something new to think about trying to organize spaces. Hellish Gelman here - one of the last Russian nationalists. As well as arguing with writer Ivanov. And Leonid Volkov in Yekaterinburg, which is something out there trying to organize at the level of municipal life. And Elena Trubina, who teaches urban planning at the Yekaterinburg University. And living in Germany, Prof. Plotnikov, who with German money trying to publish the proceedings of Russian philosophical archives. And some publishers who tirelessly translated into Russian specialists useful work, telling about the value of Russian institutions, the organization of the landscape and language policy. And Professor Auzan, which retells these works in a popular newspaper. Here's who's "Russian nationalists".
3
Nor with any "knee" in Russia zero years has not risen. Fat decade has been spent on the creation of a large police system and prilazhennyh her civilian instruments in the form of psevdoinstitutov. This system is surrounded by emptiness. Landscaping hole. By which goes back and forth nonsense "Russian march".
It.
Towards a "Russian march"
Alexander Morozov
November 4 soon. Celebration of "liberation from the occupation regime." Young and not so young people go to any "wetlands" are chanting something, wearing T-shirts "Jaroussky" and think that somehow contribute to the restoration of Russia. They do not realize that the preservation of Russian as a modern nation due to the possibility or impossibility of cultural dominance. One may shake banners, repeating, "Thank you Grandpa for victory" - and thus gradually degrade friendly march to moving out of the world's history.
1
On what rests the "cultural domination"? From an early German romanticism and to this day it stands on three things: language, landscape, institutions. Of course, in some way organized and interpreted.
language. you can not provide cultural domination without creating an aura of absolute importance of one's own language. Language given by God and the people is the voice of being itself. Therefore, the so-called "national elite" attaches great importance to the most "car maintenance language." This machine consists of the cultivation of historical figures, experimented with the language of the mandatory support of ancient forms of the native language of the system integration of other people in your language, etc. Roughly speaking, the "Russian nationalist" - is now the one who knows at least some amount of church-Slavic, as well as experiencing constant interest in our language group. Cult figures for the nationalists are not only the military chiefs, and, in the first place, "the organizers of the tongue", the creators of literature. Modern developed nations create and maintain cultural giant work units engaged in the global promotion of their own language.
In what may look optics, Russian in the post twenty years completely hammered into your language. Soviet machine of the Russian language was. But she broke with the Soviet Union. The state of Russia has done nothing that could be described as efforts to create a "machine language". Unlike the Armenians, and the Estonians have not found the influential elite groups who have realized the importance of language policy.
Landscape. It is easily seen traveling around the world that the attractiveness of a nation and its cultural dominance are associated with particular attitude to the organization of the landscape. The basic notion of Russian life is "a landscape gap." That is, simply put, continuous hole. In these holes the wind chasing plastic bags blown from landfills. Any people can equip a hundred feet around the hearth of his own family. But in order to dominate the cultural need to create a national organization of public car spaces and landscapes. If you do not know how to do, do not understand why this is necessary, then no, Alexander Nevsky, and no banner will not save you from failure in the history of the world. Russian landscape was always so poorly organized that man as a "native" to himself he could only think of something subhuman, a natural (native land - a "get out in the open field, I - your delicate ear"). Social historians will say that the Russian city appeared too late for the most part as a military garrison, and then - as a closed military production. So it is. Russian never liked own cities. And in the post-Soviet twenty years, those who got to lead the life of the people, too little to understand the role of the landscape. They did not realize that the person takes the shape of the landscape. Today, we continue to live like a pile of discarded plastic bags that wind is in the landscape hole. And while this is so, the Estonians and the Chechens as a people are more cultured than us, not to mention the Dutch or Swiss.
institutions. We assume that the theoretical sociology in the last third of the twentieth century responded to the question of why the small group of nations - large and small - to keep the cultural leadership in a globalizing world. This is the result of careful, conservative attitude to the national social, political and cultural institutions. You can not save the cultural dominance, if you do not "impersonal institutions" (Douglas North), which were used by your parents, grandparents and great-grandparents. Such institutions can be both formal and informal. It can be as "institutions" and "norms". But these institutions - as sites of social communication, as the "agora" as instruments of a long history of "exchange" - should be maintained through the generations. It may be universities, parliaments, foundations, fraternities, professional associations, national archives and libraries, etc. Moreover, such institutions are even elements of the historic landscape, everyday traditions, norms of verbal behavior. These institutions are now undergoing a transformation, or even a "crisis" and in those nations that have preserved cultural domination. But there is no sense to equate their "crisis" and our antiinstitutsionalizm. These are different things. We have a still continue to believe the heroes of national history than those who maintained institutions and those who rushil instrumentalizoval or how horrible a day for reasons of political expediency.
2
So who here and now is the "Russian nationalists"?
It's not that kids who loudly shouts to "Russian march". And do not those who are taking care of her top, sitting in the security agencies. What is the meaning of something to shout about Caucasians and about NATO, if you are unable to provide cultural domination and have no idea on what it is based?
This is not due to NATO, we still have no premium for foreign Slavists. And not because of the Caucasus in a large Russian city, where there is a main plant of the first Russian oligarch hundreds of Forbes, for 20 years, were able to equip only 100 meters quay. Note that both the river itself, as we know, this is also a national cultural institution. Not because of Kadyrov in the center of Smolensk in the river for twenty years lying around the farm of an unfinished bridge. And no Azerbaijani diaspora Vologda blame that on the dominant bend someone drove the elite residential complex in appearance resembling a grain elevator.
If your sons will not learn by heart your own "Beowulf", then your daughter will give birth to other nations. There are often different idiots like to repeat the refrain about the fact that "if you do not feed their own army, it will be fed by others." And it would be correct to say otherwise: you do not want to feed their own philologists Russian Language? It's okay to feed them by other States. How, in fact, it happened in two decades.
We've been the last Russian nationalists.
This is a weak path from scattered across a vast plain, philologists, poets, museum professionals, architects, urban planners, young, new urban activists, thinking about how to equip the "public space". Peering in recent years to what is happening here in Russia, I see some places here and there - like mushrooms under the dense foliage withered, - without any "system" scattered remains of the Russian cultural identity. It is not in the faith (Orthodox), not "force of Russian arms," and not in the memory of the "Soviet empire" and the power of the Eastern bloc. She - in new developments for which a meaningful guess the intention associated with the language, landscape and institutions. Therefore, the "Russian nationalists" here today - is, for example, the fund Yeltsin, who set up, finally, the prize for writers living outside the Russian Federation and writing in Russian. This site personnel and Openspace Polit.ru, which, as the weak force, talking about the Russian philology. This is an electronic archive of the creators runivers, who are concerned that the national archives are not digitized and are not published. These young cultural planners in Karelia, Krasnoyarsk, Perm, Samara, Yekaterinburg, which in the past few years something new to think about trying to organize spaces. Hellish Gelman here - one of the last Russian nationalists. As well as arguing with writer Ivanov. And Leonid Volkov in Yekaterinburg, which is something out there trying to organize at the level of municipal life. And Elena Trubina, who teaches urban planning at the Yekaterinburg University. And living in Germany, Prof. Plotnikov, who with German money trying to publish the proceedings of Russian philosophical archives. And some publishers who tirelessly translated into Russian specialists useful work, telling about the value of Russian institutions, the organization of the landscape and language policy. And Professor Auzan, which retells these works in a popular newspaper. Here's who's "Russian nationalists".
3
Nor with any "knee" in Russia zero years has not risen. Fat decade has been spent on the creation of a large police system and prilazhennyh her civilian instruments in the form of psevdoinstitutov. This system is surrounded by emptiness. Landscaping hole. By which goes back and forth nonsense "Russian march".
It.
Total Comments 0
