:):(:confused::mad::p ;):D:o:rolleyes::cool:
Found the perfect definition of this art!
Posted 27-07-2009 at 23:51 by Черномашенцев Владимир
Thinking about their everyday concerns, I once found for a definition of what constitutes a real iskusstvom.Srazu also anticipating the possible charges in the complete absence of my relevant theme of education and a diploma, once again I beg to draw attention to the footnote "From the Editor ...". However, in some areas of contemporary conceptual art, I have profiled a diploma (see below).
So, after disputes with friends and acquaintances on the modern (and not only) of art, I was able to find a perfect definition of art that has nothing to do with stereotypes, education and science, ideology, nationality, level of artistic training, etc., and TAs.
For me, art is what I am under no circumstances would not be able to repeat himself.
Even if I will learn a hundred years, even if I give the most sophisticated equipment and instruments, even if I invite all the millions and billions. Art does not depend on technology and skill of the artist. I have often observed, when even the artist himself is unable to repeat the picture painted at one time under the influence of mood, emotion or inspiration. Soul, in a nutshell.
I am not an artist, I like that from the Chukchi jokes: "Chukchi not the reader, Chukchi - a writer." I - Collector. But I can not very well put together and pull the stretchers blank canvas, as did the conceptual companion, referred to in the beginning of the topic. I do not remember his name. I can not quite tie to the wall and connect multiple fluorescent lamps, as was done in the Pushkin Museum in the exhibition "300 years of Amer. Art "(2007) unknown to me as an electrician. Incidentally, I myself am an electrician diploma, issued in the Soviet Union, so that in this, believe me, I'm a good specialist. Once in the workshop of one artist, I drew his attention to the set of all kinds of lamps and bulbs, which he clocked at the ceiling to provide proper light in the long winter evenings. Along with spectacular piece of tin, it made an impression far more spectacular than what I saw then in the Pushkin Museum. But nobody in their right mind vzbredet head to call it art. Otherwise, each Tajik, who carries around a construction site on my cars with broken bricks and all sorts of debris, may require too much money for their hard work. Piece - for each wheelbarrow!
See the book:
Museum of Modern iskusstva.Nyu York. 2005 WORD
And ask yourself questions:
1) Can you repeat a bunch of wires and lamps, as made on p. 281 Rodi Graumans? Incidentally, he is my year of birth, but I no longer Kruchu wiring money and earn a living exclusively own mind.
2) Is it possible to produce infinitely SMART cars on the assembly line, as on page 291?
3) Can I use the screwdriver to attach to a wall shelf, as it did on page 274, Robert Ryman?
4) Is it possible to again expand the corrugated board, as it did on page 275, Frank O. Jerry?
5) Can I also "highly artistic" hang on the wall felt like it did on page 255, Robert Morris?
If you have positive answers to these questions, then ask yourself another one - then what is it Amer. "Art". And whether or not to imitate it?
You should not confuse art and design. Picture and poster. Graphics and photos. Soul and the free market.
I was born in the USSR, but am not a supporter of communism (voluntarily and with the scandal came from the ranks of the Komsomol in 1989, when nothing was clear, "seized" with an almost entire group Baumanke). But I vote for censorship. Censorship, to the museums and exhibition halls are penetrated edits things, and still more foul language and pornography. Do not rely on the opinion of the people - in our old quarter there are almost no people. The bulk of the Russians can only call the people watching that they can do with herself officials, politicians, policemen, traffic police, tax inspectors, already, to a lesser extent, the bandits ... or you are ready to use at the Bolshoi our pop stage? That's impossible! Stop already, and it is possible if pay money and invest in a commercial project promotion of an artist or an artist. Example N. Baskova illustrative, although he at least notes do not misinterpret.
So in America, rich people want for their own money, too, be an artist. Why not join the millionaires with their own kind and buy each other something that may well nastrugat large quantities of Chinese "manufacturers". I can also paint a stencil aerosol paints colorful squares! I want fame and glory! But why not consider it necessary to spend this precious time?
There is a good phrase - "time will judge." It may not be rigid censorship, but let's agree not to let in the best museums of modern art, yet it will not be self-tested a naturally over time? It is not accepted in civilized countries erect monuments in vivo, even famous people. Wax in the panopticon to the people - perhaps, but not the monuments.
So, after disputes with friends and acquaintances on the modern (and not only) of art, I was able to find a perfect definition of art that has nothing to do with stereotypes, education and science, ideology, nationality, level of artistic training, etc., and TAs.
For me, art is what I am under no circumstances would not be able to repeat himself.
Even if I will learn a hundred years, even if I give the most sophisticated equipment and instruments, even if I invite all the millions and billions. Art does not depend on technology and skill of the artist. I have often observed, when even the artist himself is unable to repeat the picture painted at one time under the influence of mood, emotion or inspiration. Soul, in a nutshell.
I am not an artist, I like that from the Chukchi jokes: "Chukchi not the reader, Chukchi - a writer." I - Collector. But I can not very well put together and pull the stretchers blank canvas, as did the conceptual companion, referred to in the beginning of the topic. I do not remember his name. I can not quite tie to the wall and connect multiple fluorescent lamps, as was done in the Pushkin Museum in the exhibition "300 years of Amer. Art "(2007) unknown to me as an electrician. Incidentally, I myself am an electrician diploma, issued in the Soviet Union, so that in this, believe me, I'm a good specialist. Once in the workshop of one artist, I drew his attention to the set of all kinds of lamps and bulbs, which he clocked at the ceiling to provide proper light in the long winter evenings. Along with spectacular piece of tin, it made an impression far more spectacular than what I saw then in the Pushkin Museum. But nobody in their right mind vzbredet head to call it art. Otherwise, each Tajik, who carries around a construction site on my cars with broken bricks and all sorts of debris, may require too much money for their hard work. Piece - for each wheelbarrow!
See the book:
Museum of Modern iskusstva.Nyu York. 2005 WORD
And ask yourself questions:
1) Can you repeat a bunch of wires and lamps, as made on p. 281 Rodi Graumans? Incidentally, he is my year of birth, but I no longer Kruchu wiring money and earn a living exclusively own mind.
2) Is it possible to produce infinitely SMART cars on the assembly line, as on page 291?
3) Can I use the screwdriver to attach to a wall shelf, as it did on page 274, Robert Ryman?
4) Is it possible to again expand the corrugated board, as it did on page 275, Frank O. Jerry?
5) Can I also "highly artistic" hang on the wall felt like it did on page 255, Robert Morris?
If you have positive answers to these questions, then ask yourself another one - then what is it Amer. "Art". And whether or not to imitate it?
You should not confuse art and design. Picture and poster. Graphics and photos. Soul and the free market.
I was born in the USSR, but am not a supporter of communism (voluntarily and with the scandal came from the ranks of the Komsomol in 1989, when nothing was clear, "seized" with an almost entire group Baumanke). But I vote for censorship. Censorship, to the museums and exhibition halls are penetrated edits things, and still more foul language and pornography. Do not rely on the opinion of the people - in our old quarter there are almost no people. The bulk of the Russians can only call the people watching that they can do with herself officials, politicians, policemen, traffic police, tax inspectors, already, to a lesser extent, the bandits ... or you are ready to use at the Bolshoi our pop stage? That's impossible! Stop already, and it is possible if pay money and invest in a commercial project promotion of an artist or an artist. Example N. Baskova illustrative, although he at least notes do not misinterpret.
So in America, rich people want for their own money, too, be an artist. Why not join the millionaires with their own kind and buy each other something that may well nastrugat large quantities of Chinese "manufacturers". I can also paint a stencil aerosol paints colorful squares! I want fame and glory! But why not consider it necessary to spend this precious time?
There is a good phrase - "time will judge." It may not be rigid censorship, but let's agree not to let in the best museums of modern art, yet it will not be self-tested a naturally over time? It is not accepted in civilized countries erect monuments in vivo, even famous people. Wax in the panopticon to the people - perhaps, but not the monuments.
Total Comments 0
