Again, I ripped off
Posted 28-06-2011 at 11:29 by Вадим Алексеев
Whenever I read with interest Valery Skurlatov - without a doubt, the best political philosopher in LJ, and every time his lack of wonder in the world outside the Echo of Moscow, the remnants of TV discussion, papers and expert communities. That's about the people's privatization:
Originally posted by
skurlatov at me again rob
Link to original
Originally posted by
skurlatov at me again rob started a new round of privatization of state property for a few tens of dollars Millard. Sberbank, Aeroflot, Railways, etc. Both my parents worked, the state built up wealth, they and their heirs are entitled to their share of "common property". It is my right to his share of "national wealth" - is sacred. No one will never be persuaded me that this wealth should go to a bunch of marauders, but I'll be destitute. Like, let them come, "effective owners" and create new jobs and offer me as a working (slave) force them to work for the Courchevel and yachts and all sorts of lewdness. I do not agree!
However, I am - a loner. Others disagree and constantly over and over again support the looters at referenda and elections. Or try not to notice robbery, prefer not to deal with looters - no matter how horrible of them, what gives them nafig. So, to find allies for political self-organization still does not work, organize mass protests can not be left to clear my conscience to preach to empty the idea of "popular privatization", realized in the more successful countries than Russia patient.
However, once in December 1988 I telephoned Boris N. Yeltsin, who got acquainted with this program I have compiled neostolypinskogo Russian People's Front (RNF) "to the national wealth", and invited them to his State Building, where now placed the Council of Federation. We talked to close, then moved to "recreation room" for his office and drank well, and Boris Yeltsin has assured me that he wanted to become a "Russian Deng Xiaoping," and that in the event of coming to power of self-ownership to transfer directly into the hands of Soviet citizens. And we have concluded a political alliance that led to the natural jealousy among the leaders of a "socialist" of the Moscow People's Front (Boris Kagarlitsky, Sergei Stankevich, Michael Malyutin). However, by June 1990 Yeltsin came under the influence comprador type Chubais and comprador way immediately provided him with money and Western support, and the arduous path of privatization, modernization densyaopinovskogo type were pushed aside. Besides, I was convinced that Yeltsin had made friends with Yakovlev, which I thought was not so much an "agent of influence", but simply an enemy, a traitor to my country under the injurious demagogic smokescreen "de-Stalinization." And I in June 1990 became a member of the Centrist antieltsinskogo block, in which, alas, has not met ardent supporters of the "people's privatization."
part of the Soviet Communists advocated a return to Leninist principles of the NEP and the "cooperative plan", they caught Yakovlev, and contrasted the "nomenclature", in the end MPs voted for the Russian version of "People's privatization", ie for introduction of inalienable property of registered certificates, but Chubais persuaded Yeltsin issued a decree to introduce (to bypass the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR) anonymous vouchers for each of which can be de get "two" Volga "," simple-minded and "scoops" to believe, and the industry infrastructure has passed into the hands of looters, and has been the ruin of the stream and we are all witnesses. Villagers also poobscheli "land shares", ruining the collective and state farm economy, but under Putin have adopted such laws, which allowed looters to fish these "units" from the hands of naive village and in the end for the first time in national history to pull the Russian land from under the feet of the Russian peasant. So we found ourselves among the ruins of its former wealth, but looters grown fat worms in ulcers Russia.
In the context of "popular privatization" was to privatize the apartments is good, but marauding State took care of the protection of private property, which many latter-day "owners" could not be saved. It is clear that when ordinary people for free, rather than as the fruit of their hard work goes to the property, that comes for free and without effort is not appreciated and easily lost. Some citizens receiving property, he immediately lost it - drank and went to the homeless. What a contrast to Singapore, where the state is economically and administratively hedging those who handed out the apartment! And the American president Abraham Lincoln, when in the midst of civil war between north and south in order to strengthen the "roots of a single nation" gave Americans who want a few acres of land (Homestead Act of May 20, 1862), set a condition - 5 years probation, during which zemlepoluchatel undertook to master the land, build a house on it, prove its ability to dispose of inherited wealth for free.
The collapse of privatization in Chubais and Putin are aroused rossiyantsev aversion to privatization in general. Communist Party today continues to call for the "nationalization", that is to return the bureaucratic management of enterprises and 'social consumption funds. " But it is - the repetition of long traveled, the "nationalization" is not good, and the Chinese Communists under Deng Xiaoping in time moved away from her and over and over again in stages up until now perform a "popular privatization", in which our home-grown moss-covered "left" and delve do not want. They say - how is it that our bowels and built our company by all the people will be in the hands of the oligarchs who stole must return to the people. On paper - it is beautiful, but forgot about the ravines. Well, appoint new managers of "their", unless they are sure to dispose the property of their best? It should be in the "popular privatization" to make sure that the wolves ("oligarchs", more or less zealous owners) were "intact" (ie not rskassirovany), and "sheep" were "fed up", and cite the example of economic policy Hitler, who "self-seekers oligarchs" translated in the status of "captains of industry" without resorting to executions and confiscations.
Of course, criminal instigated a new portion of the "privatization" when the rich become richer by looting, and the poor poorer citizens . How can pass between Scylla and Charybdis etatizatsii looting? The only balanced and most effective way - the "popular privatization." Every citizen of rozhdaniya gets its share of national wealth, and this right is fixed in nominal inalienable, as a passport, and not subject to transfer to someone else's trust, "property certificate" that allows citizens to choose life over in a variety of raffles and tendering and bidding a variety of assets in the form of housing, land, money, stocks, etc. amounting to approximately half a million dollars in gold equivalent. Goal - the acquisition of social and political subjectivity through citizen obrektenie financial and economic self-sufficiency, nurturing a "critical mass" of low-level of subjectivity, the bond of interest with the interests of a citizen of the state, promoting patriotism.
Procedures "popular privatization" are known from the experience of many successful countries and do not imply, of course, one-stage distribution for all hands on half a million dollars. Provided for in the nominal property entitlements 500 000 USD are the virtual possibility, which is implemented gradually over the life of a citizen. For example, a construction company is building an apartment building, and in terms of the agreement with the government allocates 10%of apartments for sertifikatchikov. Suppose the market value of apartments - 1.5 million USD If you decide to purchase an apartment a couple of newlyweds, they have at the disposal of only one million, while the remaining USD 500 000 they can get out of the egg capsule, borrow, obtain a mortgage. Or will the couple to seek shelter cheaper or decide to build a town on land acquisition which will cost them or for free as a young family, or, say, a certificate authority 100 000 cu Similar to the procedure of privatization of enterprises - 10%of the shares can be reserved for sertifikatnikami working for this company, another 10%- for other sertifikatnikami, besides everyone can buy shares sertifikatnik this company on the market price on the stock market if the state decides to allocate for sale in the market of the shares of this company. There are many options, and the more people will, through its inalienable certificate involved in the "popular privatization", the more they become entrenched in their own country and the stronger will be voprinimat it as "their", as the Motherland.
«People privatization" - the highest form of social justice. Previous generations of our sweat and blood, created the country, and each of us as their heir is entitled to a share of its wealth. Who against? No arguments against. But severe irritation to those who offer a "popular privatization" - ie, not only from liberastov, but usually almost in a fight rush rossiyantsy simple. Bitter experience has developed their instincts - if someone offers something "divided" and "distribute" means that someone is trying to cheat people and rake power and money. And do not want to hear! Let all the oligarchs rastaschat looters - but not "popular privatization»!
The trouble is that the other words I do not know and continue to convince others that the earth revolves around the sun rather than vice versa. And while I convince of the correctness of poor patients countrymen by no means possible. And new tidbits of public property would get back with the connivance of looters scattered and confused rossiyanskogo population.
However, I am - a loner. Others disagree and constantly over and over again support the looters at referenda and elections. Or try not to notice robbery, prefer not to deal with looters - no matter how horrible of them, what gives them nafig. So, to find allies for political self-organization still does not work, organize mass protests can not be left to clear my conscience to preach to empty the idea of "popular privatization", realized in the more successful countries than Russia patient.
However, once in December 1988 I telephoned Boris N. Yeltsin, who got acquainted with this program I have compiled neostolypinskogo Russian People's Front (RNF) "to the national wealth", and invited them to his State Building, where now placed the Council of Federation. We talked to close, then moved to "recreation room" for his office and drank well, and Boris Yeltsin has assured me that he wanted to become a "Russian Deng Xiaoping," and that in the event of coming to power of self-ownership to transfer directly into the hands of Soviet citizens. And we have concluded a political alliance that led to the natural jealousy among the leaders of a "socialist" of the Moscow People's Front (Boris Kagarlitsky, Sergei Stankevich, Michael Malyutin). However, by June 1990 Yeltsin came under the influence comprador type Chubais and comprador way immediately provided him with money and Western support, and the arduous path of privatization, modernization densyaopinovskogo type were pushed aside. Besides, I was convinced that Yeltsin had made friends with Yakovlev, which I thought was not so much an "agent of influence", but simply an enemy, a traitor to my country under the injurious demagogic smokescreen "de-Stalinization." And I in June 1990 became a member of the Centrist antieltsinskogo block, in which, alas, has not met ardent supporters of the "people's privatization."
part of the Soviet Communists advocated a return to Leninist principles of the NEP and the "cooperative plan", they caught Yakovlev, and contrasted the "nomenclature", in the end MPs voted for the Russian version of "People's privatization", ie for introduction of inalienable property of registered certificates, but Chubais persuaded Yeltsin issued a decree to introduce (to bypass the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR) anonymous vouchers for each of which can be de get "two" Volga "," simple-minded and "scoops" to believe, and the industry infrastructure has passed into the hands of looters, and has been the ruin of the stream and we are all witnesses. Villagers also poobscheli "land shares", ruining the collective and state farm economy, but under Putin have adopted such laws, which allowed looters to fish these "units" from the hands of naive village and in the end for the first time in national history to pull the Russian land from under the feet of the Russian peasant. So we found ourselves among the ruins of its former wealth, but looters grown fat worms in ulcers Russia.
In the context of "popular privatization" was to privatize the apartments is good, but marauding State took care of the protection of private property, which many latter-day "owners" could not be saved. It is clear that when ordinary people for free, rather than as the fruit of their hard work goes to the property, that comes for free and without effort is not appreciated and easily lost. Some citizens receiving property, he immediately lost it - drank and went to the homeless. What a contrast to Singapore, where the state is economically and administratively hedging those who handed out the apartment! And the American president Abraham Lincoln, when in the midst of civil war between north and south in order to strengthen the "roots of a single nation" gave Americans who want a few acres of land (Homestead Act of May 20, 1862), set a condition - 5 years probation, during which zemlepoluchatel undertook to master the land, build a house on it, prove its ability to dispose of inherited wealth for free.
The collapse of privatization in Chubais and Putin are aroused rossiyantsev aversion to privatization in general. Communist Party today continues to call for the "nationalization", that is to return the bureaucratic management of enterprises and 'social consumption funds. " But it is - the repetition of long traveled, the "nationalization" is not good, and the Chinese Communists under Deng Xiaoping in time moved away from her and over and over again in stages up until now perform a "popular privatization", in which our home-grown moss-covered "left" and delve do not want. They say - how is it that our bowels and built our company by all the people will be in the hands of the oligarchs who stole must return to the people. On paper - it is beautiful, but forgot about the ravines. Well, appoint new managers of "their", unless they are sure to dispose the property of their best? It should be in the "popular privatization" to make sure that the wolves ("oligarchs", more or less zealous owners) were "intact" (ie not rskassirovany), and "sheep" were "fed up", and cite the example of economic policy Hitler, who "self-seekers oligarchs" translated in the status of "captains of industry" without resorting to executions and confiscations.
Of course, criminal instigated a new portion of the "privatization" when the rich become richer by looting, and the poor poorer citizens . How can pass between Scylla and Charybdis etatizatsii looting? The only balanced and most effective way - the "popular privatization." Every citizen of rozhdaniya gets its share of national wealth, and this right is fixed in nominal inalienable, as a passport, and not subject to transfer to someone else's trust, "property certificate" that allows citizens to choose life over in a variety of raffles and tendering and bidding a variety of assets in the form of housing, land, money, stocks, etc. amounting to approximately half a million dollars in gold equivalent. Goal - the acquisition of social and political subjectivity through citizen obrektenie financial and economic self-sufficiency, nurturing a "critical mass" of low-level of subjectivity, the bond of interest with the interests of a citizen of the state, promoting patriotism.
Procedures "popular privatization" are known from the experience of many successful countries and do not imply, of course, one-stage distribution for all hands on half a million dollars. Provided for in the nominal property entitlements 500 000 USD are the virtual possibility, which is implemented gradually over the life of a citizen. For example, a construction company is building an apartment building, and in terms of the agreement with the government allocates 10%of apartments for sertifikatchikov. Suppose the market value of apartments - 1.5 million USD If you decide to purchase an apartment a couple of newlyweds, they have at the disposal of only one million, while the remaining USD 500 000 they can get out of the egg capsule, borrow, obtain a mortgage. Or will the couple to seek shelter cheaper or decide to build a town on land acquisition which will cost them or for free as a young family, or, say, a certificate authority 100 000 cu Similar to the procedure of privatization of enterprises - 10%of the shares can be reserved for sertifikatnikami working for this company, another 10%- for other sertifikatnikami, besides everyone can buy shares sertifikatnik this company on the market price on the stock market if the state decides to allocate for sale in the market of the shares of this company. There are many options, and the more people will, through its inalienable certificate involved in the "popular privatization", the more they become entrenched in their own country and the stronger will be voprinimat it as "their", as the Motherland.
«People privatization" - the highest form of social justice. Previous generations of our sweat and blood, created the country, and each of us as their heir is entitled to a share of its wealth. Who against? No arguments against. But severe irritation to those who offer a "popular privatization" - ie, not only from liberastov, but usually almost in a fight rush rossiyantsy simple. Bitter experience has developed their instincts - if someone offers something "divided" and "distribute" means that someone is trying to cheat people and rake power and money. And do not want to hear! Let all the oligarchs rastaschat looters - but not "popular privatization»!
The trouble is that the other words I do not know and continue to convince others that the earth revolves around the sun rather than vice versa. And while I convince of the correctness of poor patients countrymen by no means possible. And new tidbits of public property would get back with the connivance of looters scattered and confused rossiyanskogo population.
Link to original
Total Comments 0
