I think so - Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Любознательный · 10.07.2010, 21:54

I banned myself, not waiting until it will do the rest.
I really like the forum, but because I use force and have spent my time to make it more attractive and widespread.
To forum users who have something to say to fearlessly express their views. Without the fear that they pecked apart with impunity.
These fears are not groundless.
I opened the arbor on "The great mighty", which was closed without my opinion.
As author, I find it difficult to judge the relevance of the theme of literacy intellectuals, the inadmissibility of rudeness in communication and courtesy - the inherent quality of every educated man.
Known to all by name a small group routinely tried to turn the topic in a different direction - in the tram-communal bickering, provoking me to like their behavior. With me it is not crawled.
NATA NOVA, upheld their convictions in a language accessible to the above-mentioned groups which had been banned, and the theme - closed. And, before my evening airing of harvested message.
Of course, the admin has the right to ban any and close the topic.
However, this requires the existence of conditions which, in my opinion, in this particular situation were not available.
I have no way of discussing the admin, and urge others not to do so.
For me, left unanswered several questions:
1. Why were nezabanennymi those who provoked a scandal?
2. Why punish me as the author's theme, closing it? I like the author, not the right TIMELY removed from its subject line, prevents its disclosure.

Under the circumstances, I find no moral justification for its continued participation in the discussion topics, and more so in their creation.

I am aware that this is unlikely to change the order that emerged at the forum that the forum appeared before me and will continue its work regardless of my participation.

But I can not do otherwise.
In addition to the declaration of principles, they must defend.
Otherwise phase begins empty boltologii and phrase-mongering.
So, with what I tried to fight on the forum.
No results found .

10.07.2010, 21:54	Язык оригинала: Русский #1
Любознательный Бывалый Регистрация: 10.04.2010 Сообщений: 301 Спасибо: 470 Поблагодарили 326 раз(а) в 132 сообщениях Репутация: 653	I think so I banned myself, not waiting until it will do the rest. I really like the forum, but because I use force and have spent my time to make it more attractive and widespread. To forum users who have something to say to fearlessly express their views. Without the fear that they pecked apart with impunity. These fears are not groundless. I opened the arbor on "The great mighty", which was closed without my opinion. As author, I find it difficult to judge the relevance of the theme of literacy intellectuals, the inadmissibility of rudeness in communication and courtesy - the inherent quality of every educated man. Known to all by name a small group routinely tried to turn the topic in a different direction - in the tram-communal bickering, provoking me to like their behavior. With me it is not crawled. NATA NOVA, upheld their convictions in a language accessible to the above-mentioned groups which had been banned, and the theme - closed. And, before my evening airing of harvested message. Of course, the admin has the right to ban any and close the topic. However, this requires the existence of conditions which, in my opinion, in this particular situation were not available. I have no way of discussing the admin, and urge others not to do so. For me, left unanswered several questions: 1. Why were nezabanennymi those who provoked a scandal? 2. Why punish me as the author's theme, closing it? I like the author, not the right TIMELY removed from its subject line, prevents its disclosure. Under the circumstances, I find no moral justification for its continued participation in the discussion topics, and more so in their creation. I am aware that this is unlikely to change the order that emerged at the forum that the forum appeared before me and will continue its work regardless of my participation. But I can not do otherwise. In addition to the declaration of principles, they must defend. Otherwise phase begins empty boltologii and phrase-mongering. So, with what I tried to fight on the forum. No results found .