Need help in the attribution

[vladimir45]

paper --- tempera. Size of approximately 55-70 cm. On the reverse side has a label with the exhibition but all data zamyty and worn. Interestingly your opinion. Maybe someone will tell where to get information about the exhibitions of the Moscow Association.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

The Moscow Association of Artists - Association of Moscow artists, are agreeable to the 1893 "Exhibition of paintings by Moscow artists", and since 1896 - after the adoption of the statute -- "Exhibitions of paintings of Moscow Association of Artists".
Association existed before 1924 and arranged 26 exhibitions in Moscow, St. Petersburg, as well as in other cities: Orel, Saratov, Tver, Yaroslavl.
"The Association aims to promote the success and development of the arts in Russia, as well as care for the interests of its members (Charter of the Moscow Association of Artists. M., 1896, pp. 3).
In 1917, the association consists of 35 members of the Association: SV Beklemishev, LM Brailovsky, VA Vatagin, VV Vladimirov, A. Glagolev, A. Golubkina, E. Goldinger , IG Gugunava, VN Domogatskii, I. Efimov, B. M. Kamensky, VD Zamirailo, FI Zakharov, AG Ivanov, Ya Ya Kalinichenko, E . Kamentseva IV, VI Komarov, AI Kravchenko, P. Mironovich, II Nivinsky, SV Noakovsky, MM Ogranovich, P. J. Pavlinov, VA D . Polenov, FI Rerberg, N. J. Simonovic, Efimova, AP Tokarev, NP Ulyanov, VA Tabor, JF Shapshal, VD Shitikov, A. I. Navigator, O. Engels, A. G. Yakimchenko, A. Jasinski.
Board of the Association in 1917 were artists: FI Rerberg (Sergeant), B. N. Domogatskii (secretary), P. J. Peacock (Treasurer), E. Goldinger, IG Gugunava.
In 1917, the Association showed the 23rd exhibition of paintings and sculptures in Moscow (2 February - 1 March).

[vladimir45]

Thank you very much but I was referring to was a little more. Once the tag such as an exhibition where you might have data on the work - to look for a possible name, and thus establish the authorship

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от vladimir45

can be where there is evidence of work - watch for a possible name, and thus establish the authorship

Yes. Yes "Lists of exhibitions of the Moscow Association of Artists and the Society of Artists of historical painting".
But I do not know about modern reprinting them.
Only in libraries, archives.
And on the authorship of the participants who can will tell you something kind of familiar, but I like the summer did not understand about the authorship.
In those days many Muscovites seem.

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

In those days many Muscovites seem.

Yes, with the fly so to say.

I have no one in the head never comes.

Pavlinov?

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Igor Guriev, me more Brailovsky come. Perhaps because of the architecture depicted? What is it, by the way? Bakhchisaray any?

[Игорь Гурьев]

Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky

Igor Guriev, me more Brailovsky come. Perhaps because of the architecture depicted? What is it, by the way? Bakhchisaray any?

And hell knows.
You notice the minaret of a few ugly painted?

In general, my dear little thing, I must say.

[vladimir45]

Do not write earlier but was 7.8 years ago showed that work Petrov ----- He also expressed and where it is strongly Brailovsky.

[Кирилл Сызранский]

Сообщение от vladimir45

7.8 years ago showed that work Petrov ----- He also expressed and where it is strongly Brailovsky.

Nice to hear it, I confess.

[vladimir45]

And you're right about the minaret. he really is a little bit of crooked. I remember who you made it Toli Alupka or Alushta and supposedly it looks like Musatov ---- it there like before. " What if I find an archive